认知控制:数据驱动型组织中管理相关性的案例研究

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Dan-Richard Knudsen , Bino Catasús , Katarina Kaarbøe
{"title":"认知控制:数据驱动型组织中管理相关性的案例研究","authors":"Dan-Richard Knudsen ,&nbsp;Bino Catasús ,&nbsp;Katarina Kaarbøe","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines how digitalization transforms management control by reshaping the epistemic conditions under which relevance is made and sustained. Drawing on an in-depth case study of MediaCorp, a media conglomerate undergoing a data-driven transformation, we identify two co-existing epistemic cultures: a narrative-driven culture, where relevance emerges through storytelling and strategic framing, and a data-driven culture, where relevance is discovered through empirical rigor and standardized analytics. While the ambition to become data driven initially emerged as a narrative, we find that both cultures persist, creating ongoing tensions in decision-making processes.</div><div>To conceptualize how organizations actively manage these tensions, we introduce the notion of epistemic control—the organizational practice of aligning epistemic cultures with their associated epistemic machineries (empirical, technological, and social). Our findings suggest that management control does not merely structure decision making but also serves as an active mechanism for shaping how knowledge is produced, validated, and institutionalized. Through epistemic control, management control systems can reinforce, challenge, and recalibrate epistemic cultures, ensuring that relevance remains both contested and actionable in a digital environment.</div><div>This study contributes to management control research by highlighting the interdependence between the digital context and knowledge-making practices. We argue that management control in digitalized organizations involves more than implementing algorithmic and data-driven decision systems—it also requires the active mediation of competing epistemic cultures. Our findings extend existing literature by showing that epistemic control is an integral yet often overlooked dimension of management control, essential for maintaining organizational coherence amidst digital transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102808"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic control: A case study on managing relevance in a data-driven organization\",\"authors\":\"Dan-Richard Knudsen ,&nbsp;Bino Catasús ,&nbsp;Katarina Kaarbøe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines how digitalization transforms management control by reshaping the epistemic conditions under which relevance is made and sustained. Drawing on an in-depth case study of MediaCorp, a media conglomerate undergoing a data-driven transformation, we identify two co-existing epistemic cultures: a narrative-driven culture, where relevance emerges through storytelling and strategic framing, and a data-driven culture, where relevance is discovered through empirical rigor and standardized analytics. While the ambition to become data driven initially emerged as a narrative, we find that both cultures persist, creating ongoing tensions in decision-making processes.</div><div>To conceptualize how organizations actively manage these tensions, we introduce the notion of epistemic control—the organizational practice of aligning epistemic cultures with their associated epistemic machineries (empirical, technological, and social). Our findings suggest that management control does not merely structure decision making but also serves as an active mechanism for shaping how knowledge is produced, validated, and institutionalized. Through epistemic control, management control systems can reinforce, challenge, and recalibrate epistemic cultures, ensuring that relevance remains both contested and actionable in a digital environment.</div><div>This study contributes to management control research by highlighting the interdependence between the digital context and knowledge-making practices. We argue that management control in digitalized organizations involves more than implementing algorithmic and data-driven decision systems—it also requires the active mediation of competing epistemic cultures. Our findings extend existing literature by showing that epistemic control is an integral yet often overlooked dimension of management control, essential for maintaining organizational coherence amidst digital transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Perspectives on Accounting\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Perspectives on Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235425000218\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235425000218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了数字化是如何通过重塑相关产生和维持的认知条件来改变管理控制的。通过对MediaCorp(一家正在经历数据驱动转型的媒体集团)的深入案例研究,我们确定了两种共存的认知文化:一种是叙事驱动的文化,通过讲故事和战略框架产生相关性;另一种是数据驱动的文化,通过严谨的经验和标准化的分析发现相关性。虽然成为数据驱动的雄心最初是作为一种叙述出现的,但我们发现这两种文化都存在,在决策过程中造成了持续的紧张关系。为了概念化组织如何积极管理这些紧张关系,我们引入了认知控制的概念——将认知文化与其相关的认知机制(经验的、技术的和社会的)结合起来的组织实践。我们的研究结果表明,管理控制不仅构成了决策,而且作为一种积极的机制,塑造了知识如何产生、验证和制度化。通过认识论控制,管理控制系统可以加强、挑战和重新校准认识论文化,确保在数字环境中仍然具有争议性和可操作性。本研究通过强调数字环境和知识制造实践之间的相互依存关系,有助于管理控制研究。我们认为,数字化组织中的管理控制不仅仅涉及实施算法和数据驱动的决策系统,还需要相互竞争的认知文化的积极调解。我们的研究结果扩展了现有文献,表明认知控制是管理控制的一个不可或缺但经常被忽视的维度,对于在数字化转型中保持组织一致性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epistemic control: A case study on managing relevance in a data-driven organization
This paper examines how digitalization transforms management control by reshaping the epistemic conditions under which relevance is made and sustained. Drawing on an in-depth case study of MediaCorp, a media conglomerate undergoing a data-driven transformation, we identify two co-existing epistemic cultures: a narrative-driven culture, where relevance emerges through storytelling and strategic framing, and a data-driven culture, where relevance is discovered through empirical rigor and standardized analytics. While the ambition to become data driven initially emerged as a narrative, we find that both cultures persist, creating ongoing tensions in decision-making processes.
To conceptualize how organizations actively manage these tensions, we introduce the notion of epistemic control—the organizational practice of aligning epistemic cultures with their associated epistemic machineries (empirical, technological, and social). Our findings suggest that management control does not merely structure decision making but also serves as an active mechanism for shaping how knowledge is produced, validated, and institutionalized. Through epistemic control, management control systems can reinforce, challenge, and recalibrate epistemic cultures, ensuring that relevance remains both contested and actionable in a digital environment.
This study contributes to management control research by highlighting the interdependence between the digital context and knowledge-making practices. We argue that management control in digitalized organizations involves more than implementing algorithmic and data-driven decision systems—it also requires the active mediation of competing epistemic cultures. Our findings extend existing literature by showing that epistemic control is an integral yet often overlooked dimension of management control, essential for maintaining organizational coherence amidst digital transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Critical Perspectives on Accounting aims to provide a forum for the growing number of accounting researchers and practitioners who realize that conventional theory and practice is ill-suited to the challenges of the modern environment, and that accounting practices and corporate behavior are inextricably connected with many allocative, distributive, social, and ecological problems of our era. From such concerns, a new literature is emerging that seeks to reformulate corporate, social, and political activity, and the theoretical and practical means by which we apprehend and affect that activity. Research Areas Include: • Studies involving the political economy of accounting, critical accounting, radical accounting, and accounting''s implication in the exercise of power • Financial accounting''s role in the processes of international capital formation, including its impact on stock market stability and international banking activities • Management accounting''s role in organizing the labor process • The relationship between accounting and the state in various social formations • Studies of accounting''s historical role, as a means of "remembering" the subject''s social and conflictual character • The role of accounting in establishing "real" democracy at work and other domains of life • Accounting''s adjudicative function in international exchanges, such as that of the Third World debt • Antagonisms between the social and private character of accounting, such as conflicts of interest in the audit process • The identification of new constituencies for radical and critical accounting information • Accounting''s involvement in gender and class conflicts in the workplace • The interplay between accounting, social conflict, industrialization, bureaucracy, and technocracy • Reappraisals of the role of accounting as a science and technology • Critical reviews of "useful" scientific knowledge about organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信