英国生物银行参与者血浆中APOE和TREM2变异与胶质纤维酸性蛋白和神经丝光的差异关联支持不同的疾病机制

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Yun Freudenberg-Hua, Luca Giliberto, Cristina d’Abramo, Wentian Li, Yilong Ma, Alison Goate, Jeremy Koppel
{"title":"英国生物银行参与者血浆中APOE和TREM2变异与胶质纤维酸性蛋白和神经丝光的差异关联支持不同的疾病机制","authors":"Yun Freudenberg-Hua, Luca Giliberto, Cristina d’Abramo, Wentian Li, Yilong Ma, Alison Goate, Jeremy Koppel","doi":"10.1038/s41380-025-03098-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NEFL) are key dementia biomarkers. GFAP and NEFL represent different underlying disease processes, i.e. astrocytic activation vs. neuronal damage. The associations of established genetic risk variants with these biomarkers may reflect time course and mechanisms by which the respective genes influence disease risk. Therefore, we investigated the association of the established high-effect dementia variants in <i>APOE</i> and <i>TREM2</i> with these biomarkers, in a large population cohort of over 50,000 participants from the UK Biobank (UKB). The results show that <i>APOE4</i> is associated with elevated levels of plasma GFAP, and to a lesser extent, NEFL. The <i>APOE4</i> effect on GFAP increases with age and the number of <i>APOE4</i> alleles. The risk variants R47H and R62H in <i>TREM2</i> are associated with higher NEFL levels, but not with GFAP, and the effect sizes do not increase with age. In contrast, the protective <i>APOE2</i> allele showed no effect on GFAP or NEFL. In conclusion, we find that major genetic risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease exhibit distinct patterns of effect on these biomarkers, with <i>APOE4</i> primarily affecting astrocyte activation starting in midlife, while <i>TREM2</i> variants affect NEFL but not GFAP, and the protective effects of <i>APOE2</i> are not captured by either of these biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"671 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential associations of APOE and TREM2 variants with glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light in plasma of UK Biobank participants support distinct disease mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Yun Freudenberg-Hua, Luca Giliberto, Cristina d’Abramo, Wentian Li, Yilong Ma, Alison Goate, Jeremy Koppel\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41380-025-03098-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NEFL) are key dementia biomarkers. GFAP and NEFL represent different underlying disease processes, i.e. astrocytic activation vs. neuronal damage. The associations of established genetic risk variants with these biomarkers may reflect time course and mechanisms by which the respective genes influence disease risk. Therefore, we investigated the association of the established high-effect dementia variants in <i>APOE</i> and <i>TREM2</i> with these biomarkers, in a large population cohort of over 50,000 participants from the UK Biobank (UKB). The results show that <i>APOE4</i> is associated with elevated levels of plasma GFAP, and to a lesser extent, NEFL. The <i>APOE4</i> effect on GFAP increases with age and the number of <i>APOE4</i> alleles. The risk variants R47H and R62H in <i>TREM2</i> are associated with higher NEFL levels, but not with GFAP, and the effect sizes do not increase with age. In contrast, the protective <i>APOE2</i> allele showed no effect on GFAP or NEFL. In conclusion, we find that major genetic risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease exhibit distinct patterns of effect on these biomarkers, with <i>APOE4</i> primarily affecting astrocyte activation starting in midlife, while <i>TREM2</i> variants affect NEFL but not GFAP, and the protective effects of <i>APOE2</i> are not captured by either of these biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"671 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03098-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03098-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血浆胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和神经丝光(NEFL)水平是痴呆症的关键生物标志物。GFAP和NEFL代表不同的潜在疾病过程,即星形细胞激活与神经元损伤。已确定的遗传风险变异与这些生物标志物的关联可能反映了各自基因影响疾病风险的时间过程和机制。因此,我们在来自英国生物银行(UKB)的超过50,000名参与者的大型人群队列中研究了APOE和TREM2中已建立的高效痴呆变异与这些生物标志物的关系。结果表明,APOE4与血浆GFAP水平升高有关,并在较小程度上与NEFL有关。APOE4对GFAP的影响随着年龄和APOE4等位基因数量的增加而增加。TREM2中的风险变异R47H和R62H与较高的NEFL水平相关,但与GFAP无关,且效应大小不随年龄增长而增加。相比之下,保护性APOE2等位基因对GFAP或NEFL没有影响。总之,我们发现阿尔茨海默病的主要遗传危险因素对这些生物标志物的影响模式不同,APOE4主要影响中年开始的星形胶质细胞激活,而TREM2变异影响NEFL但不影响GFAP, APOE2的保护作用没有被这些生物标志物捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differential associations of APOE and TREM2 variants with glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light in plasma of UK Biobank participants support distinct disease mechanisms

Differential associations of APOE and TREM2 variants with glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light in plasma of UK Biobank participants support distinct disease mechanisms

Plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NEFL) are key dementia biomarkers. GFAP and NEFL represent different underlying disease processes, i.e. astrocytic activation vs. neuronal damage. The associations of established genetic risk variants with these biomarkers may reflect time course and mechanisms by which the respective genes influence disease risk. Therefore, we investigated the association of the established high-effect dementia variants in APOE and TREM2 with these biomarkers, in a large population cohort of over 50,000 participants from the UK Biobank (UKB). The results show that APOE4 is associated with elevated levels of plasma GFAP, and to a lesser extent, NEFL. The APOE4 effect on GFAP increases with age and the number of APOE4 alleles. The risk variants R47H and R62H in TREM2 are associated with higher NEFL levels, but not with GFAP, and the effect sizes do not increase with age. In contrast, the protective APOE2 allele showed no effect on GFAP or NEFL. In conclusion, we find that major genetic risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease exhibit distinct patterns of effect on these biomarkers, with APOE4 primarily affecting astrocyte activation starting in midlife, while TREM2 variants affect NEFL but not GFAP, and the protective effects of APOE2 are not captured by either of these biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信