妊娠早期先兆流产、自然流产或人工流产后重新考虑RhIg。

Justin Wei-Jia Lim, Adam Suleman, Karen Fung-Kee-Fung, Julie Thorne, Gwen Clarke, Lani Lieberman
{"title":"妊娠早期先兆流产、自然流产或人工流产后重新考虑RhIg。","authors":"Justin Wei-Jia Lim, Adam Suleman, Karen Fung-Kee-Fung, Julie Thorne, Gwen Clarke, Lani Lieberman","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine Rh(D) immunoglobulin (RhIg) administration following first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions is a long-standing practice, but emerging evidence suggests limited benefit. This editorial reviews the outdated data that has informed current guidelines and presents contemporary literature demonstrating a negligible risk of RhD alloimmunization at early gestational ages. Recent studies challenge the necessity of RhIg in the first trimester, and highlight the clinical, resource, and equity-related harms of routine use. In light of evolving evidence and the need to optimize healthcare delivery, we recommend against routine RhD testing and RhIg administration for first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","volume":" ","pages":"103039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering RhIg following threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions in the first trimester.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Wei-Jia Lim, Adam Suleman, Karen Fung-Kee-Fung, Julie Thorne, Gwen Clarke, Lani Lieberman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Routine Rh(D) immunoglobulin (RhIg) administration following first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions is a long-standing practice, but emerging evidence suggests limited benefit. This editorial reviews the outdated data that has informed current guidelines and presents contemporary literature demonstrating a negligible risk of RhD alloimmunization at early gestational ages. Recent studies challenge the necessity of RhIg in the first trimester, and highlight the clinical, resource, and equity-related harms of routine use. In light of evolving evidence and the need to optimize healthcare delivery, we recommend against routine RhD testing and RhIg administration for first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妊娠早期先兆流产、自然流产或人工流产后常规注射Rh(D)免疫球蛋白(RhIg)是一种长期的做法,但新出现的证据表明益处有限。这篇社论回顾了为现行指南提供信息的过时数据,并提出了当代文献,表明早期妊娠期异体免疫接种RhD的风险可以忽略不计。最近的研究对妊娠早期进行RhIg的必要性提出了质疑,并强调了常规使用的临床、资源和公平相关危害。鉴于不断发展的证据和优化医疗服务的需要,我们建议不要对妊娠早期先兆流产、自然流产或人工流产进行常规RhD检测和rhg管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconsidering RhIg following threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions in the first trimester.

Routine Rh(D) immunoglobulin (RhIg) administration following first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions is a long-standing practice, but emerging evidence suggests limited benefit. This editorial reviews the outdated data that has informed current guidelines and presents contemporary literature demonstrating a negligible risk of RhD alloimmunization at early gestational ages. Recent studies challenge the necessity of RhIg in the first trimester, and highlight the clinical, resource, and equity-related harms of routine use. In light of evolving evidence and the need to optimize healthcare delivery, we recommend against routine RhD testing and RhIg administration for first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信