{"title":"妊娠早期先兆流产、自然流产或人工流产后重新考虑RhIg。","authors":"Justin Wei-Jia Lim, Adam Suleman, Karen Fung-Kee-Fung, Julie Thorne, Gwen Clarke, Lani Lieberman","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine Rh(D) immunoglobulin (RhIg) administration following first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions is a long-standing practice, but emerging evidence suggests limited benefit. This editorial reviews the outdated data that has informed current guidelines and presents contemporary literature demonstrating a negligible risk of RhD alloimmunization at early gestational ages. Recent studies challenge the necessity of RhIg in the first trimester, and highlight the clinical, resource, and equity-related harms of routine use. In light of evolving evidence and the need to optimize healthcare delivery, we recommend against routine RhD testing and RhIg administration for first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","volume":" ","pages":"103039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering RhIg following threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions in the first trimester.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Wei-Jia Lim, Adam Suleman, Karen Fung-Kee-Fung, Julie Thorne, Gwen Clarke, Lani Lieberman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Routine Rh(D) immunoglobulin (RhIg) administration following first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions is a long-standing practice, but emerging evidence suggests limited benefit. This editorial reviews the outdated data that has informed current guidelines and presents contemporary literature demonstrating a negligible risk of RhD alloimmunization at early gestational ages. Recent studies challenge the necessity of RhIg in the first trimester, and highlight the clinical, resource, and equity-related harms of routine use. In light of evolving evidence and the need to optimize healthcare delivery, we recommend against routine RhD testing and RhIg administration for first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reconsidering RhIg following threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions in the first trimester.
Routine Rh(D) immunoglobulin (RhIg) administration following first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions is a long-standing practice, but emerging evidence suggests limited benefit. This editorial reviews the outdated data that has informed current guidelines and presents contemporary literature demonstrating a negligible risk of RhD alloimmunization at early gestational ages. Recent studies challenge the necessity of RhIg in the first trimester, and highlight the clinical, resource, and equity-related harms of routine use. In light of evolving evidence and the need to optimize healthcare delivery, we recommend against routine RhD testing and RhIg administration for first trimester threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortions.