保加利亚人群中不同皮肤临床类型红斑狼疮的免疫学相关性。

Dimitrina Guleva, Lyubka Miteva, Vessela Raykova, Lyubomir Dourmishev
{"title":"保加利亚人群中不同皮肤临床类型红斑狼疮的免疫学相关性。","authors":"Dimitrina Guleva, Lyubka Miteva, Vessela Raykova, Lyubomir Dourmishev","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disorder with various clinical manifestations. Depending on the clinical-immunological correlation different variants with a variable prognosis, multiple strategies for therapy and follow-up are described. Moreover, a regular immunological monitoring could help for a timely established aggravation of the disease from localized to systemic form. The aim of preset study was to analyze the antibody profile of patients with cutaneous manifestations in different subtypes of lupus erythematosus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven Bulgarian patients with different clinical variants of lupus erythematosus, admitted in the Department of Dermatology in Alexandrovska University Hospital in Sofia between October 2017 and May 2021 were investigated and their data were compared to those of 63 persons control group. Several immune-serological markers as ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-SM/RNP, anti-histone, anti-C1q, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSA/Ro52, anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-SSB/La were used. Statistical analysis was performed using the parametric analysis with SPSS for Windows 21.0 (IBM, SPSS statistics) software and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) analysis by MedCalc for Windows, version 20.0.23 statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistical significance (p<0.05) was found in all serological markers in LE comparing to the control group. Anti-C1q (p=0.06) had a tendency for a significance in the context of subacute cutaneous LE.Anti-SSA/Ro 52 and anti-SSA/Ro 60 were found to prevail significantly in patients with chronic cutaneous LE. Anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Sm/RNP (p<0.05) were related straightly with systemic LE. All patients in our research with higher than 1:320 titers of ANA are found to have bad disease control.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our data confirmed the strong association between anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Sm/RNP and SLE, as well as anti-SSA/Ro 52 and anti-SSA/Ro 60 and subacute cutaneous LE. ANA is a relevant marker of lupus disease activity. All lupus patients with ANA higher than 320 titter had a bad disease control. Based on our results, ANA and anti-SSB/La could be used as follow-up markers for a disease conversion form CLE to SLE. Anti-SSB/La antibodies are found in higher prevalence in patients with discoid cutaneous LE.</p>","PeriodicalId":94367,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC","volume":"32 4","pages":"199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunological Correlation in Different Cutaneous Clinical Types of Lupus Erythematosus in the Bulgarian Population.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrina Guleva, Lyubka Miteva, Vessela Raykova, Lyubomir Dourmishev\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disorder with various clinical manifestations. Depending on the clinical-immunological correlation different variants with a variable prognosis, multiple strategies for therapy and follow-up are described. Moreover, a regular immunological monitoring could help for a timely established aggravation of the disease from localized to systemic form. The aim of preset study was to analyze the antibody profile of patients with cutaneous manifestations in different subtypes of lupus erythematosus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven Bulgarian patients with different clinical variants of lupus erythematosus, admitted in the Department of Dermatology in Alexandrovska University Hospital in Sofia between October 2017 and May 2021 were investigated and their data were compared to those of 63 persons control group. Several immune-serological markers as ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-SM/RNP, anti-histone, anti-C1q, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSA/Ro52, anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-SSB/La were used. Statistical analysis was performed using the parametric analysis with SPSS for Windows 21.0 (IBM, SPSS statistics) software and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) analysis by MedCalc for Windows, version 20.0.23 statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistical significance (p<0.05) was found in all serological markers in LE comparing to the control group. Anti-C1q (p=0.06) had a tendency for a significance in the context of subacute cutaneous LE.Anti-SSA/Ro 52 and anti-SSA/Ro 60 were found to prevail significantly in patients with chronic cutaneous LE. Anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Sm/RNP (p<0.05) were related straightly with systemic LE. All patients in our research with higher than 1:320 titers of ANA are found to have bad disease control.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our data confirmed the strong association between anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Sm/RNP and SLE, as well as anti-SSA/Ro 52 and anti-SSA/Ro 60 and subacute cutaneous LE. ANA is a relevant marker of lupus disease activity. All lupus patients with ANA higher than 320 titter had a bad disease control. Based on our results, ANA and anti-SSB/La could be used as follow-up markers for a disease conversion form CLE to SLE. Anti-SSB/La antibodies are found in higher prevalence in patients with discoid cutaneous LE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"199-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:红斑狼疮是一种具有多种临床表现的自身免疫性疾病。根据临床-免疫学相关性,不同的变异与不同的预后,多种治疗和随访策略被描述。此外,定期的免疫监测可以帮助及时确定疾病从局部到全身的恶化。预先研究的目的是分析不同亚型红斑狼疮皮肤表现患者的抗体谱。方法:对2017年10月至2021年5月在索非亚亚历山德罗夫斯卡大学医院皮肤科收治的67例保加利亚不同临床变型红斑狼疮患者进行调查,并将其数据与63人对照组进行比较。采用了ANA、抗dsdna、抗sm、抗sm /RNP、抗组蛋白、抗c1q、抗ssa /Ro、抗ssa /Ro52、抗ssa /Ro60、抗ssb /La等免疫血清学标志物。统计学分析采用SPSS for Windows 21.0 (IBM, SPSS统计)软件进行参数分析,采用MedCalc for Windows 20.0.23版统计软件进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)分析。讨论:我们的数据证实了抗dsdna、抗sm、抗sm /RNP与SLE、抗ssa /Ro 52和抗ssa /Ro 60与亚急性皮肤LE之间的强相关性。ANA是红斑狼疮疾病活动的相关标志物。ANA高于320滴度的狼疮患者病情控制较差。基于我们的研究结果,ANA和抗ssb /La可以作为CLE转化为SLE的随访标志物。抗ssb /La抗体在盘状皮肤LE患者中发病率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immunological Correlation in Different Cutaneous Clinical Types of Lupus Erythematosus in the Bulgarian Population.

Introduction: Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disorder with various clinical manifestations. Depending on the clinical-immunological correlation different variants with a variable prognosis, multiple strategies for therapy and follow-up are described. Moreover, a regular immunological monitoring could help for a timely established aggravation of the disease from localized to systemic form. The aim of preset study was to analyze the antibody profile of patients with cutaneous manifestations in different subtypes of lupus erythematosus.

Methods: Sixty-seven Bulgarian patients with different clinical variants of lupus erythematosus, admitted in the Department of Dermatology in Alexandrovska University Hospital in Sofia between October 2017 and May 2021 were investigated and their data were compared to those of 63 persons control group. Several immune-serological markers as ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-SM/RNP, anti-histone, anti-C1q, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSA/Ro52, anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-SSB/La were used. Statistical analysis was performed using the parametric analysis with SPSS for Windows 21.0 (IBM, SPSS statistics) software and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) analysis by MedCalc for Windows, version 20.0.23 statistical software.

Results: A statistical significance (p<0.05) was found in all serological markers in LE comparing to the control group. Anti-C1q (p=0.06) had a tendency for a significance in the context of subacute cutaneous LE.Anti-SSA/Ro 52 and anti-SSA/Ro 60 were found to prevail significantly in patients with chronic cutaneous LE. Anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Sm/RNP (p<0.05) were related straightly with systemic LE. All patients in our research with higher than 1:320 titers of ANA are found to have bad disease control.

Discussion: Our data confirmed the strong association between anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Sm/RNP and SLE, as well as anti-SSA/Ro 52 and anti-SSA/Ro 60 and subacute cutaneous LE. ANA is a relevant marker of lupus disease activity. All lupus patients with ANA higher than 320 titter had a bad disease control. Based on our results, ANA and anti-SSB/La could be used as follow-up markers for a disease conversion form CLE to SLE. Anti-SSB/La antibodies are found in higher prevalence in patients with discoid cutaneous LE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信