门诊大手术中麻醉技术对直肠手术患者出院时间的影响。

Armando Cuesta Amigo, Nazrin Bakshasiyeva, Javier García Septiem, Enrique Alday Muñoz
{"title":"门诊大手术中麻醉技术对直肠手术患者出院时间的影响。","authors":"Armando Cuesta Amigo, Nazrin Bakshasiyeva, Javier García Septiem, Enrique Alday Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present study aims to compare the length of postoperative stay in outpatient surgery (OS) setting of patients undergoing anorectal surgery in four different anaesthetic techniques: local anaesthesia with deep sedation (LA + DS), low-dose spinal anaesthesia (LDSA) (less than 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine or less than 20 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine), high-dose spinal anaesthesia (HDSA), and general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes include analysing postoperative complications and their relationship with the chosen anaesthetic technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study of patients who underwent scheduled proctological surgery between January 2018 and September 2021. Patients were classified into four groups according to the anaesthetic technique used. The primary outcomes were the length of stay in AS, the need for postoperative opioids, postoperative nausea and vomiting, acute urinary retention, and failure to complete the AS regimen (unscheduled admission to the ward or visit to the emergency room in the first 24 hours with or without hospital admission).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 337 patients, 137 (40.4%) received HDSA, 68 (20.5%) LDSA, 106 (31.3%) GA, and 26 (7.7%) LA + DS. The longest median stay (226 minutes) was associated with HDSA (p < 0.001). The shortest time was recorded with LA + DS (121 minutes). Around 2% required opioids. 71% of them were operated under GA (p = 0.06). AUR occurred in 4% of patients, with no significant differences between groups. The rate of PONV was 74% in the GA group compared to 7-19% in the rest of the groups. A higher OS failure rate (15%) was observed in afternoon shifts compared to 5% in morning shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ambulatory proctological surgery, spinal anaesthesia with doses less than 5 mg of bupivacaine or 20 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine is effective and reduces postoperative stay times. General anaesthesia is associated with a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and increased need for postoperative opioids.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":"800157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anesthetic technique on time to discharge of patients undergoing proctological surgery in major outpatient surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Armando Cuesta Amigo, Nazrin Bakshasiyeva, Javier García Septiem, Enrique Alday Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present study aims to compare the length of postoperative stay in outpatient surgery (OS) setting of patients undergoing anorectal surgery in four different anaesthetic techniques: local anaesthesia with deep sedation (LA + DS), low-dose spinal anaesthesia (LDSA) (less than 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine or less than 20 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine), high-dose spinal anaesthesia (HDSA), and general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes include analysing postoperative complications and their relationship with the chosen anaesthetic technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study of patients who underwent scheduled proctological surgery between January 2018 and September 2021. Patients were classified into four groups according to the anaesthetic technique used. The primary outcomes were the length of stay in AS, the need for postoperative opioids, postoperative nausea and vomiting, acute urinary retention, and failure to complete the AS regimen (unscheduled admission to the ward or visit to the emergency room in the first 24 hours with or without hospital admission).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 337 patients, 137 (40.4%) received HDSA, 68 (20.5%) LDSA, 106 (31.3%) GA, and 26 (7.7%) LA + DS. The longest median stay (226 minutes) was associated with HDSA (p < 0.001). The shortest time was recorded with LA + DS (121 minutes). Around 2% required opioids. 71% of them were operated under GA (p = 0.06). AUR occurred in 4% of patients, with no significant differences between groups. The rate of PONV was 74% in the GA group compared to 7-19% in the rest of the groups. A higher OS failure rate (15%) was observed in afternoon shifts compared to 5% in morning shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ambulatory proctological surgery, spinal anaesthesia with doses less than 5 mg of bupivacaine or 20 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine is effective and reduces postoperative stay times. General anaesthesia is associated with a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and increased need for postoperative opioids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia espanola\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"800157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较四种不同麻醉技术下肛肠手术患者的门诊手术(OS)时间:深度镇静局部麻醉(LA + DS)、低剂量脊髓麻醉(LDSA)(少于5 mg高压布比卡因或少于20 mg高压丙罗卡因)、高剂量脊髓麻醉(HDSA)和全身麻醉(GA)。次要结果包括分析术后并发症及其与所选麻醉技术的关系。方法:回顾性观察研究2018年1月至2021年9月期间接受直肠外科手术的患者。根据麻醉方式将患者分为四组。主要结局是AS住院时间、术后阿片类药物的需求、术后恶心和呕吐、急性尿潴留以及未能完成AS治疗方案(在住院或不住院的前24小时内未安排入住病房或访问急诊室)。结果:337例患者中,137例(40.4%)接受HDSA, 68例(20.5%)接受LDSA, 106例(31.3%)接受GA, 26例(7.7%)接受LA + DS。中位住院时间最长(226分钟)与HDSA相关(p结论:在门诊直肠外科手术中,布比卡因剂量小于5mg或高压丙胺卡因剂量小于20mg的脊髓麻醉是有效的,可减少术后住院时间。全身麻醉与恶心、呕吐发生率增高和术后阿片类药物需求增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of anesthetic technique on time to discharge of patients undergoing proctological surgery in major outpatient surgery.

Introduction: The present study aims to compare the length of postoperative stay in outpatient surgery (OS) setting of patients undergoing anorectal surgery in four different anaesthetic techniques: local anaesthesia with deep sedation (LA + DS), low-dose spinal anaesthesia (LDSA) (less than 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine or less than 20 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine), high-dose spinal anaesthesia (HDSA), and general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes include analysing postoperative complications and their relationship with the chosen anaesthetic technique.

Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients who underwent scheduled proctological surgery between January 2018 and September 2021. Patients were classified into four groups according to the anaesthetic technique used. The primary outcomes were the length of stay in AS, the need for postoperative opioids, postoperative nausea and vomiting, acute urinary retention, and failure to complete the AS regimen (unscheduled admission to the ward or visit to the emergency room in the first 24 hours with or without hospital admission).

Results: Out of 337 patients, 137 (40.4%) received HDSA, 68 (20.5%) LDSA, 106 (31.3%) GA, and 26 (7.7%) LA + DS. The longest median stay (226 minutes) was associated with HDSA (p < 0.001). The shortest time was recorded with LA + DS (121 minutes). Around 2% required opioids. 71% of them were operated under GA (p = 0.06). AUR occurred in 4% of patients, with no significant differences between groups. The rate of PONV was 74% in the GA group compared to 7-19% in the rest of the groups. A higher OS failure rate (15%) was observed in afternoon shifts compared to 5% in morning shifts.

Conclusions: In ambulatory proctological surgery, spinal anaesthesia with doses less than 5 mg of bupivacaine or 20 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine is effective and reduces postoperative stay times. General anaesthesia is associated with a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and increased need for postoperative opioids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信