Siamese网络中用于当前和先前乳房x光图像分析的基准距离函数。

Sahand Hamzehei, Afsana Ahsan Jeny, Annie Jin, Clifford Yang, Sheida Nabavi
{"title":"Siamese网络中用于当前和先前乳房x光图像分析的基准距离函数。","authors":"Sahand Hamzehei, Afsana Ahsan Jeny, Annie Jin, Clifford Yang, Sheida Nabavi","doi":"10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mammogram image analysis has benefited from advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through the use of Siamese networks, which, similar to radiologists, compare current and prior mammogram images to enhance diagnostic accuracy. One of the main challenges in employing Siamese networks for this purpose is selecting an effective distance function. Given the complexity of mammogram images and the high correlation between current and prior images, traditional distance functions in Siamese networks often fall short in capturing the subtle, non-linear differences between these correlated features. This study explores the impact of incorporating non-linear and correlation-sensitive distance functions within a Siamese network framework for analyzing paired mammogram images. We benchmarked different distance functions, including Euclidean, Manhattan, Mahalanobis, Radial Basis Function (RBF), and cosine, and introduced a novel combination of RBF with Matern Covariance. Our evaluation revealed that the RBF with Matern Covariance consistently outperformed other functions, emphasizing the importance of addressing non-linearity and correlation in this context. For instance, the ResNet50 model, when paired with this distance function, achieved an accuracy of 0.938, sensitivity of 0.921, precision of 0.955, specificity of 0.958, F1 score of 0.930, and AUC of 0.940. We observed similarly strong performance across other models as well. Furthermore, the robustness of our approach was confirmed through evaluation on a dataset of 30 cross-validation samples, demonstrating its generalizability. These findings underscore the effectiveness of non-linear and correlation-based distance functions in Siamese networks for improving the performance and generalization of mammogram image analysis. All codes used in this paper are available at https://github.com/NabaviLab/Benchmarking_Distance_Functions_in_Siamese_Networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":74563,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1996-2003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12250141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Distance Functions in Siamese Networks for Current and Prior Mammogram Image Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sahand Hamzehei, Afsana Ahsan Jeny, Annie Jin, Clifford Yang, Sheida Nabavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mammogram image analysis has benefited from advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through the use of Siamese networks, which, similar to radiologists, compare current and prior mammogram images to enhance diagnostic accuracy. One of the main challenges in employing Siamese networks for this purpose is selecting an effective distance function. Given the complexity of mammogram images and the high correlation between current and prior images, traditional distance functions in Siamese networks often fall short in capturing the subtle, non-linear differences between these correlated features. This study explores the impact of incorporating non-linear and correlation-sensitive distance functions within a Siamese network framework for analyzing paired mammogram images. We benchmarked different distance functions, including Euclidean, Manhattan, Mahalanobis, Radial Basis Function (RBF), and cosine, and introduced a novel combination of RBF with Matern Covariance. Our evaluation revealed that the RBF with Matern Covariance consistently outperformed other functions, emphasizing the importance of addressing non-linearity and correlation in this context. For instance, the ResNet50 model, when paired with this distance function, achieved an accuracy of 0.938, sensitivity of 0.921, precision of 0.955, specificity of 0.958, F1 score of 0.930, and AUC of 0.940. We observed similarly strong performance across other models as well. Furthermore, the robustness of our approach was confirmed through evaluation on a dataset of 30 cross-validation samples, demonstrating its generalizability. These findings underscore the effectiveness of non-linear and correlation-based distance functions in Siamese networks for improving the performance and generalization of mammogram image analysis. All codes used in this paper are available at https://github.com/NabaviLab/Benchmarking_Distance_Functions_in_Siamese_Networks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"1996-2003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12250141/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳房x光片图像分析得益于人工智能(AI)的进步,特别是通过使用暹罗网络,该网络与放射科医生类似,比较当前和先前的乳房x光片图像以提高诊断准确性。为此目的使用暹罗网络的主要挑战之一是选择有效的距离函数。考虑到乳房x光图像的复杂性以及当前图像和先前图像之间的高度相关性,Siamese网络中的传统距离函数通常无法捕捉这些相关特征之间微妙的非线性差异。本研究探讨了在暹罗网络框架内纳入非线性和相关敏感距离函数的影响,用于分析配对乳房x线照片。我们对不同的距离函数进行基准测试,包括欧几里得、曼哈顿、马氏、径向基函数(RBF)和余弦函数,并引入了一种新的RBF与Matern协方差的组合。我们的评估显示,具有母协方差的RBF始终优于其他函数,强调了在这种情况下解决非线性和相关性的重要性。例如,ResNet50模型与该距离函数配对时,准确率为0.938,灵敏度为0.921,精度为0.955,特异性为0.958,F1评分为0.930,AUC为0.940。我们在其他模型中也观察到类似的强劲表现。此外,通过对30个交叉验证样本的数据集进行评估,证实了我们方法的稳健性,证明了它的通用性。这些发现强调了Siamese网络中非线性和基于相关的距离函数在提高乳房x光图像分析性能和泛化方面的有效性。本文中使用的所有代码都可以在https://github.com/NabaviLab/Benchmarking_Distance_Functions_in_Siamese_Networks上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benchmarking Distance Functions in Siamese Networks for Current and Prior Mammogram Image Analysis.

Mammogram image analysis has benefited from advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through the use of Siamese networks, which, similar to radiologists, compare current and prior mammogram images to enhance diagnostic accuracy. One of the main challenges in employing Siamese networks for this purpose is selecting an effective distance function. Given the complexity of mammogram images and the high correlation between current and prior images, traditional distance functions in Siamese networks often fall short in capturing the subtle, non-linear differences between these correlated features. This study explores the impact of incorporating non-linear and correlation-sensitive distance functions within a Siamese network framework for analyzing paired mammogram images. We benchmarked different distance functions, including Euclidean, Manhattan, Mahalanobis, Radial Basis Function (RBF), and cosine, and introduced a novel combination of RBF with Matern Covariance. Our evaluation revealed that the RBF with Matern Covariance consistently outperformed other functions, emphasizing the importance of addressing non-linearity and correlation in this context. For instance, the ResNet50 model, when paired with this distance function, achieved an accuracy of 0.938, sensitivity of 0.921, precision of 0.955, specificity of 0.958, F1 score of 0.930, and AUC of 0.940. We observed similarly strong performance across other models as well. Furthermore, the robustness of our approach was confirmed through evaluation on a dataset of 30 cross-validation samples, demonstrating its generalizability. These findings underscore the effectiveness of non-linear and correlation-based distance functions in Siamese networks for improving the performance and generalization of mammogram image analysis. All codes used in this paper are available at https://github.com/NabaviLab/Benchmarking_Distance_Functions_in_Siamese_Networks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信