以人为中心的咨询干预,以改善骨质疏松症药物的共同决策和吸收(iFraP):一个实用的,平行组,个体随机对照试验方案。

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2025-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13571.3
Laurna Bullock, Elaine Nicholls, Andrea Cherrington, Stephanie Butler-Walley, Emma M Clark, Jane Fleming, Sarah Leyland, Ida Bentley, Simon Thomas, Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia, David Webb, Jo Smith, Sarah Bathers, Sarah Lewis, Angela Clifford, Michele Siciliano, Joanne Protheroe, Sarah Ryan, Janet Lefroy, Nicky Dale, Ashley Hawarden, Sarah Connacher, Robert Horne, Terence W O'Neill, Christian D Mallen, Clare Jinks, Zoe Paskins
{"title":"以人为中心的咨询干预,以改善骨质疏松症药物的共同决策和吸收(iFraP):一个实用的,平行组,个体随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Laurna Bullock, Elaine Nicholls, Andrea Cherrington, Stephanie Butler-Walley, Emma M Clark, Jane Fleming, Sarah Leyland, Ida Bentley, Simon Thomas, Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia, David Webb, Jo Smith, Sarah Bathers, Sarah Lewis, Angela Clifford, Michele Siciliano, Joanne Protheroe, Sarah Ryan, Janet Lefroy, Nicky Dale, Ashley Hawarden, Sarah Connacher, Robert Horne, Terence W O'Neill, Christian D Mallen, Clare Jinks, Zoe Paskins","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13571.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Good quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with, or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians collaborating to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person's life, beliefs, and values. We developed the <b>i</b>mproving uptake of <b>Fra</b>cture <b>P</b>revention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprising a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training package and information resources, for use in UK Fracture Liaison Service consultations. Two primary objectives to determine (1) the effect of the iFraP intervention on patient-reported ease in decision-making about osteoporosis medicines, and (2) cost-effectiveness of iFraP intervention compared to usual NHS care. Secondary objectives are to determine the iFraP intervention effect on patient reported outcome and experience measures, clinical effectiveness (osteoporosis medicine adherence), and to explore intervention acceptability, mechanisms, and processes underlying observed effects, and intervention implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The iFraP trial is a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial in patients referred to a Fracture Liaison Service, with nested mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants aged ≥50 years (n=380) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to one of two arms: (1) iFraP intervention (iFraP-i) or (2) comparator usual NHS care (iFraP-u) and are followed up at 2-weeks and 3-months. The primary outcome is ease of decision-making assessed 2 weeks after the consultation using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The primary objectives will be addressed by comparing the mean DCS score in each trial arm (using analysis of covariance) for patients given an osteoporosis medicine recommendation, alongside a within-trial cost-effectiveness and value of information (VoI) analysis. Process evaluation data collection includes consultation recordings, semi-structured interviews, and DST analytics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The iFraP trial will answer important questions about the effectiveness of the new 'iFraP' osteoporosis DST, coupled with clinician training, on SDM and informed initiation of osteoporosis medicines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Laurna Bullock, Elaine Nicholls, Andrea Cherrington, Stephanie Butler-Walley, Emma M Clark, Jane Fleming, Sarah Leyland, Ida Bentley, Simon Thomas, Cynthia P Iglesias-Urrutia, David Webb, Jo Smith, Sarah Bathers, Sarah Lewis, Angela Clifford, Michele Siciliano, Joanne Protheroe, Sarah Ryan, Janet Lefroy, Nicky Dale, Ashley Hawarden, Sarah Connacher, Robert Horne, Terence W O'Neill, Christian D Mallen, Clare Jinks, Zoe Paskins\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13571.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Good quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with, or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians collaborating to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person's life, beliefs, and values. We developed the <b>i</b>mproving uptake of <b>Fra</b>cture <b>P</b>revention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprising a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training package and information resources, for use in UK Fracture Liaison Service consultations. Two primary objectives to determine (1) the effect of the iFraP intervention on patient-reported ease in decision-making about osteoporosis medicines, and (2) cost-effectiveness of iFraP intervention compared to usual NHS care. Secondary objectives are to determine the iFraP intervention effect on patient reported outcome and experience measures, clinical effectiveness (osteoporosis medicine adherence), and to explore intervention acceptability, mechanisms, and processes underlying observed effects, and intervention implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The iFraP trial is a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial in patients referred to a Fracture Liaison Service, with nested mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants aged ≥50 years (n=380) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to one of two arms: (1) iFraP intervention (iFraP-i) or (2) comparator usual NHS care (iFraP-u) and are followed up at 2-weeks and 3-months. The primary outcome is ease of decision-making assessed 2 weeks after the consultation using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The primary objectives will be addressed by comparing the mean DCS score in each trial arm (using analysis of covariance) for patients given an osteoporosis medicine recommendation, alongside a within-trial cost-effectiveness and value of information (VoI) analysis. Process evaluation data collection includes consultation recordings, semi-structured interviews, and DST analytics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The iFraP trial will answer important questions about the effectiveness of the new 'iFraP' osteoporosis DST, coupled with clinician training, on SDM and informed initiation of osteoporosis medicines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320037/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13571.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13571.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高质量的共同决策(SDM)对话涉及骨质疏松症患者或有骨质疏松症风险的人与临床医生合作,在适当的情况下决定哪种循证药物最适合患者的生活、信仰和价值观。我们开发了骨折预防药物治疗(iFraP)干预措施,包括计算机化决策支持工具(DST)、临床医生培训包和信息资源,用于英国骨折联络服务咨询。两个主要目的是确定(1)iFraP干预对患者报告的骨质疏松药物决策难易程度的影响,以及(2)与常规NHS护理相比,iFraP干预的成本效益。次要目标是确定iFraP干预对患者报告的结果和经验测量、临床有效性(骨质疏松药物依从性)的影响,并探讨干预的可接受性、机制和观察效果的过程,以及干预的实施。方法:iFraP试验是一项实用的,平行组,个体随机对照试验,涉及骨折联络服务的患者,采用嵌套混合方法过程评估和健康经济分析。年龄≥50岁的参与者(n=380)被随机(1:1比例)分为两组:(1)iFraP干预(iFraP-i)或(2)比较者通常的NHS护理(iFraP-u),随访时间分别为2周和3个月。主要结果是在咨询后2周使用决策冲突量表(DCS)评估决策的容易程度。主要目标将通过比较给予骨质疏松药物推荐的患者的每个试验组的平均DCS评分(使用协方差分析),以及试验内成本效益和信息价值(VoI)分析来解决。过程评估数据收集包括咨询记录、半结构化访谈和DST分析。讨论:iFraP试验将回答有关新的“iFraP”骨质疏松症DST有效性的重要问题,并结合临床医生培训、SDM和骨质疏松症药物的知情起始。试验注册:ISRCTN10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol.

A person-centred consultation intervention to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines (iFraP): a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial protocol.

Background: Good quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with, or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians collaborating to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person's life, beliefs, and values. We developed the improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprising a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training package and information resources, for use in UK Fracture Liaison Service consultations. Two primary objectives to determine (1) the effect of the iFraP intervention on patient-reported ease in decision-making about osteoporosis medicines, and (2) cost-effectiveness of iFraP intervention compared to usual NHS care. Secondary objectives are to determine the iFraP intervention effect on patient reported outcome and experience measures, clinical effectiveness (osteoporosis medicine adherence), and to explore intervention acceptability, mechanisms, and processes underlying observed effects, and intervention implementation.

Methods: The iFraP trial is a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial in patients referred to a Fracture Liaison Service, with nested mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants aged ≥50 years (n=380) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to one of two arms: (1) iFraP intervention (iFraP-i) or (2) comparator usual NHS care (iFraP-u) and are followed up at 2-weeks and 3-months. The primary outcome is ease of decision-making assessed 2 weeks after the consultation using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The primary objectives will be addressed by comparing the mean DCS score in each trial arm (using analysis of covariance) for patients given an osteoporosis medicine recommendation, alongside a within-trial cost-effectiveness and value of information (VoI) analysis. Process evaluation data collection includes consultation recordings, semi-structured interviews, and DST analytics.

Discussion: The iFraP trial will answer important questions about the effectiveness of the new 'iFraP' osteoporosis DST, coupled with clinician training, on SDM and informed initiation of osteoporosis medicines.

Trial registration: ISRCTN 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信