Michael A Fajardo, Cassia Yung, Samuel Cornell, Rajesh Puranik, Anna L Hawkes, Shiva Raj Mishra, Jenny Doust, Carissa Bonner
{"title":"可用心血管疾病知识工具的质量:系统回顾。","authors":"Michael A Fajardo, Cassia Yung, Samuel Cornell, Rajesh Puranik, Anna L Hawkes, Shiva Raj Mishra, Jenny Doust, Carissa Bonner","doi":"10.5334/gh.1446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Most people can reduce their CVD risk through lifestyle improvements and medication. Having low health literacy is a barrier to CVD prevention and management and is associated with worse health outcomes. Knowledge is a key component of health literacy, but there is no standard way for clinicians to assess this to tailor education about CVD. The aim of this review was to identify available CVD knowledge tests and evaluate their quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic database searches were conducted using Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PsycTESTS between inception and October 2022. Identified tools were assessed using the Psychometric Grading Framework (PGF) to assess the quality of included tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 studies were identified, of which 18 were original test development papers and 10 were language translation papers. The five most common domains were CVD risk factors, nutrition, heart physiology, physical activity, and treatment options. Three papers achieved an A grading on the PGF. Only one test provided a guide to classify patients based on the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified 15 additional knowledge assessment tools compared to previous research, including some available in multiple languages. Clinicians can access a wide range of CVD knowledge assessment tools to understand and respond to patient knowledge levels, but some are higher quality than others. Alternative tools may be needed to assess specific risk factor and condition knowledge. Further work is needed to tailor CVD knowledge tests for populations lower health literacy, and to validate the tests against health outcomes to improve clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Prospero: </strong>CRD42022370227.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>Having low health literacy is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes.Knowledge is a key component of health literacy, but there is no standard way to assess this for CVD.An assessment of the quality and reliability of CVD knowledge tests could support clinicians to tailor patient education to health literacy needs.</p><p><strong>What the study adds: </strong>We identified 15 additional tests development papers that were not captured in earlier reviews of CVD knowledge tests.There are multiple high quality CVD knowledge tests available to clinicians, and tests available in different languages.These tests may be used to tailor patient education to individual health literacy needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"20 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Available Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Tools: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Michael A Fajardo, Cassia Yung, Samuel Cornell, Rajesh Puranik, Anna L Hawkes, Shiva Raj Mishra, Jenny Doust, Carissa Bonner\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/gh.1446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Most people can reduce their CVD risk through lifestyle improvements and medication. Having low health literacy is a barrier to CVD prevention and management and is associated with worse health outcomes. Knowledge is a key component of health literacy, but there is no standard way for clinicians to assess this to tailor education about CVD. The aim of this review was to identify available CVD knowledge tests and evaluate their quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic database searches were conducted using Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PsycTESTS between inception and October 2022. Identified tools were assessed using the Psychometric Grading Framework (PGF) to assess the quality of included tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 studies were identified, of which 18 were original test development papers and 10 were language translation papers. The five most common domains were CVD risk factors, nutrition, heart physiology, physical activity, and treatment options. Three papers achieved an A grading on the PGF. Only one test provided a guide to classify patients based on the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified 15 additional knowledge assessment tools compared to previous research, including some available in multiple languages. Clinicians can access a wide range of CVD knowledge assessment tools to understand and respond to patient knowledge levels, but some are higher quality than others. Alternative tools may be needed to assess specific risk factor and condition knowledge. Further work is needed to tailor CVD knowledge tests for populations lower health literacy, and to validate the tests against health outcomes to improve clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Prospero: </strong>CRD42022370227.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>Having low health literacy is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes.Knowledge is a key component of health literacy, but there is no standard way to assess this for CVD.An assessment of the quality and reliability of CVD knowledge tests could support clinicians to tailor patient education to health literacy needs.</p><p><strong>What the study adds: </strong>We identified 15 additional tests development papers that were not captured in earlier reviews of CVD knowledge tests.There are multiple high quality CVD knowledge tests available to clinicians, and tests available in different languages.These tests may be used to tailor patient education to individual health literacy needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Heart\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247824/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1446\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of Available Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Tools: A Systematic Review.
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Most people can reduce their CVD risk through lifestyle improvements and medication. Having low health literacy is a barrier to CVD prevention and management and is associated with worse health outcomes. Knowledge is a key component of health literacy, but there is no standard way for clinicians to assess this to tailor education about CVD. The aim of this review was to identify available CVD knowledge tests and evaluate their quality.
Methods: Electronic database searches were conducted using Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PsycTESTS between inception and October 2022. Identified tools were assessed using the Psychometric Grading Framework (PGF) to assess the quality of included tests.
Results: A total of 28 studies were identified, of which 18 were original test development papers and 10 were language translation papers. The five most common domains were CVD risk factors, nutrition, heart physiology, physical activity, and treatment options. Three papers achieved an A grading on the PGF. Only one test provided a guide to classify patients based on the results.
Conclusions: This review identified 15 additional knowledge assessment tools compared to previous research, including some available in multiple languages. Clinicians can access a wide range of CVD knowledge assessment tools to understand and respond to patient knowledge levels, but some are higher quality than others. Alternative tools may be needed to assess specific risk factor and condition knowledge. Further work is needed to tailor CVD knowledge tests for populations lower health literacy, and to validate the tests against health outcomes to improve clinical practice.
Prospero: CRD42022370227.
What is known: Having low health literacy is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes.Knowledge is a key component of health literacy, but there is no standard way to assess this for CVD.An assessment of the quality and reliability of CVD knowledge tests could support clinicians to tailor patient education to health literacy needs.
What the study adds: We identified 15 additional tests development papers that were not captured in earlier reviews of CVD knowledge tests.There are multiple high quality CVD knowledge tests available to clinicians, and tests available in different languages.These tests may be used to tailor patient education to individual health literacy needs.
Global HeartMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍:
Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources.
Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention.
Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.