Kolton Kardokus, Kerry A Stark, Anh B Lam, Shearwood McClelland
{"title":"在正式导航整合之前,乳腺癌患者在国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心的治疗经验。","authors":"Kolton Kardokus, Kerry A Stark, Anh B Lam, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast cancer accounted for over 1/3 of new US cancer diagnoses in 2024, remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally, and is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. We evaluated breast cancer patient experience at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center to assess potential barriers to optimal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 10-month period (4/1/24 to 1/31/25), eligible breast cancer patients identified in clinic visits and who self-reported diagnoses were surveyed about their experience. Each survey included a \"Likelihood to Recommend\" (LTR) question, scored on a 5-point Likert scale, as a proxy for satisfaction. We examined surveys from 2 service lines: medical practice (clinic visits) and outpatient oncology (radiation/infusion). We extracted demographic data from the electronic medical record. Underrepresented minorities (URMs) were defined as African American, Native American, and/or Hispanic patients. Fisher's exact test assessed differences by race and ethnicity (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 15,153 patients (76.5% White, 9.9% Black, 7.6% Native American, and 94.3% non-Hispanic), 2,066 patients (13.6% response rate) completed the surveys. Response rates were significantly higher among White/non-Hispanic patients compared with URMs (P=0.0001). For outpatient oncology, patient experiences did not significantly differ by race or ethnicity. For medical practice, a trend toward significance was observed by ethnicity (P=0.07), but not by race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective cohort study found significantly lower survey response rates among URMs, which could indicate barriers to sharing patient experiences. These findings establish a baseline for comparison and support future implementation of targeted navigation programs to improve patient experience and care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast Cancer Patient Treatment Experience at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center Before Formal Navigation Integration.\",\"authors\":\"Kolton Kardokus, Kerry A Stark, Anh B Lam, Shearwood McClelland\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COC.0000000000001231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast cancer accounted for over 1/3 of new US cancer diagnoses in 2024, remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally, and is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. We evaluated breast cancer patient experience at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center to assess potential barriers to optimal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 10-month period (4/1/24 to 1/31/25), eligible breast cancer patients identified in clinic visits and who self-reported diagnoses were surveyed about their experience. Each survey included a \\\"Likelihood to Recommend\\\" (LTR) question, scored on a 5-point Likert scale, as a proxy for satisfaction. We examined surveys from 2 service lines: medical practice (clinic visits) and outpatient oncology (radiation/infusion). We extracted demographic data from the electronic medical record. Underrepresented minorities (URMs) were defined as African American, Native American, and/or Hispanic patients. Fisher's exact test assessed differences by race and ethnicity (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 15,153 patients (76.5% White, 9.9% Black, 7.6% Native American, and 94.3% non-Hispanic), 2,066 patients (13.6% response rate) completed the surveys. Response rates were significantly higher among White/non-Hispanic patients compared with URMs (P=0.0001). For outpatient oncology, patient experiences did not significantly differ by race or ethnicity. For medical practice, a trend toward significance was observed by ethnicity (P=0.07), but not by race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective cohort study found significantly lower survey response rates among URMs, which could indicate barriers to sharing patient experiences. These findings establish a baseline for comparison and support future implementation of targeted navigation programs to improve patient experience and care delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast Cancer Patient Treatment Experience at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center Before Formal Navigation Integration.
Objectives: Breast cancer accounted for over 1/3 of new US cancer diagnoses in 2024, remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally, and is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. We evaluated breast cancer patient experience at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center to assess potential barriers to optimal care.
Methods: Over a 10-month period (4/1/24 to 1/31/25), eligible breast cancer patients identified in clinic visits and who self-reported diagnoses were surveyed about their experience. Each survey included a "Likelihood to Recommend" (LTR) question, scored on a 5-point Likert scale, as a proxy for satisfaction. We examined surveys from 2 service lines: medical practice (clinic visits) and outpatient oncology (radiation/infusion). We extracted demographic data from the electronic medical record. Underrepresented minorities (URMs) were defined as African American, Native American, and/or Hispanic patients. Fisher's exact test assessed differences by race and ethnicity (P<0.05).
Results: Of 15,153 patients (76.5% White, 9.9% Black, 7.6% Native American, and 94.3% non-Hispanic), 2,066 patients (13.6% response rate) completed the surveys. Response rates were significantly higher among White/non-Hispanic patients compared with URMs (P=0.0001). For outpatient oncology, patient experiences did not significantly differ by race or ethnicity. For medical practice, a trend toward significance was observed by ethnicity (P=0.07), but not by race.
Conclusions: Our retrospective cohort study found significantly lower survey response rates among URMs, which could indicate barriers to sharing patient experiences. These findings establish a baseline for comparison and support future implementation of targeted navigation programs to improve patient experience and care delivery.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists.
The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles.
The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.