111例“高风险”胫骨骨折的六足架治疗结果。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jonathan France, Adam Tucker, Jessica Nightingale, Andrew Taylor, Simon Craxford, Benjamin Ollivere
{"title":"111例“高风险”胫骨骨折的六足架治疗结果。","authors":"Jonathan France, Adam Tucker, Jessica Nightingale, Andrew Taylor, Simon Craxford, Benjamin Ollivere","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0023.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The use of circular frames in the management of tibia fractures and deformity correction is well established in the literature. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is the most widely used hexapod device globally. However, the majority of published papers are small in patient numbers, contain primary and revision cases, and outcomes are therefore unclear. In this study we evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with tibial fractures treated primarily with a TSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified from a prospective trauma database at a UK major trauma centre. An analysis of patient records and radiographs was performed for the study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, frame construct, time in frame, union rates, and complications of treatment were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2009 and January 2020, 111 patients with tibial fractures managed primarily with a TSF were included. The majority of patients (86, 77.5%) sustained fractures to the tibial shaft, leaving nine plateau (8.1%) and 16 pilon fractures (14.4%). Of these, 55 (49.6%) were open and 56 (50.4%) were closed. Of the open fractures, seven were classified as Gustilo and Anderson grade 3A and 41 (74.5%) were classified as grade 3B. The overall union rate for primary TSF was 85%, with a mean time to union of 191 days (SD 90). A total of 15 patients (13.5%) required either open reduction and internal fixation (n = 6, 5.4%) or intramedullary nail (n = 9, 8.2%) to achieve bony union. Five patients (4.5%) developed a deep infection requiring invasive treatment. Two patients (1.8%) required an eventual amputation for an infected nonunion; both of these patients sustained an initially closed fracture. Overall limb salvage at two years was 98.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TSF remains an established option in the surgical management of patients with complex injuries to the tibia, with good rates of limb salvage within this challenging patient subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 7","pages":"816-821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of the hexapod frame in 111 'high risk' tibial fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan France, Adam Tucker, Jessica Nightingale, Andrew Taylor, Simon Craxford, Benjamin Ollivere\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0023.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The use of circular frames in the management of tibia fractures and deformity correction is well established in the literature. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is the most widely used hexapod device globally. However, the majority of published papers are small in patient numbers, contain primary and revision cases, and outcomes are therefore unclear. In this study we evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with tibial fractures treated primarily with a TSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified from a prospective trauma database at a UK major trauma centre. An analysis of patient records and radiographs was performed for the study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, frame construct, time in frame, union rates, and complications of treatment were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2009 and January 2020, 111 patients with tibial fractures managed primarily with a TSF were included. The majority of patients (86, 77.5%) sustained fractures to the tibial shaft, leaving nine plateau (8.1%) and 16 pilon fractures (14.4%). Of these, 55 (49.6%) were open and 56 (50.4%) were closed. Of the open fractures, seven were classified as Gustilo and Anderson grade 3A and 41 (74.5%) were classified as grade 3B. The overall union rate for primary TSF was 85%, with a mean time to union of 191 days (SD 90). A total of 15 patients (13.5%) required either open reduction and internal fixation (n = 6, 5.4%) or intramedullary nail (n = 9, 8.2%) to achieve bony union. Five patients (4.5%) developed a deep infection requiring invasive treatment. Two patients (1.8%) required an eventual amputation for an infected nonunion; both of these patients sustained an initially closed fracture. Overall limb salvage at two years was 98.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TSF remains an established option in the surgical management of patients with complex injuries to the tibia, with good rates of limb salvage within this challenging patient subgroup.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"816-821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0023.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0023.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:圆形框架在胫骨骨折和畸形矫正中的应用在文献中得到了很好的证实。泰勒空间框架(TSF)是全球应用最广泛的六足机器人。然而,大多数已发表的论文患者数量较少,包含初级和修订病例,因此结果不明确。在这项研究中,我们评估了主要用TSF治疗胫骨骨折患者的临床和放射学结果。方法:从英国主要创伤中心的前瞻性创伤数据库中确定患者。对患者记录和x光片进行了分析。分析患者人口统计、合并症、框架结构、框架内时间、愈合率和治疗并发症。结果:2009年9月至2020年1月,纳入111例主要采用TSF治疗的胫骨骨折患者。大多数患者(86,77.5%)持续胫骨干骨折,其余平台骨折9例(8.1%),pilon骨折16例(14.4%)。其中,开放的有55家(49.6%),关闭的有56家(50.4%)。开放骨折中,7例为Gustilo和Anderson 3A级,41例为3B级,占74.5%。原发性TSF的总愈合率为85%,平均愈合时间为191天(SD 90)。共有15例(13.5%)患者需要切开复位内固定(n = 6, 5.4%)或髓内钉(n = 9, 8.2%)来实现骨愈合。5名患者(4.5%)发生深部感染,需要侵入性治疗。2例患者(1.8%)因感染的骨不连最终需要截肢;这两名患者最初都是闭合性骨折。2年的整体肢体保留率为98.2%。结论:在复杂胫骨损伤患者的手术治疗中,TSF仍然是一种确定的选择,在这一具有挑战性的患者亚组中具有良好的肢体保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of the hexapod frame in 111 'high risk' tibial fractures.

Aims: The use of circular frames in the management of tibia fractures and deformity correction is well established in the literature. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is the most widely used hexapod device globally. However, the majority of published papers are small in patient numbers, contain primary and revision cases, and outcomes are therefore unclear. In this study we evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with tibial fractures treated primarily with a TSF.

Methods: Patients were identified from a prospective trauma database at a UK major trauma centre. An analysis of patient records and radiographs was performed for the study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, frame construct, time in frame, union rates, and complications of treatment were analyzed.

Results: Between September 2009 and January 2020, 111 patients with tibial fractures managed primarily with a TSF were included. The majority of patients (86, 77.5%) sustained fractures to the tibial shaft, leaving nine plateau (8.1%) and 16 pilon fractures (14.4%). Of these, 55 (49.6%) were open and 56 (50.4%) were closed. Of the open fractures, seven were classified as Gustilo and Anderson grade 3A and 41 (74.5%) were classified as grade 3B. The overall union rate for primary TSF was 85%, with a mean time to union of 191 days (SD 90). A total of 15 patients (13.5%) required either open reduction and internal fixation (n = 6, 5.4%) or intramedullary nail (n = 9, 8.2%) to achieve bony union. Five patients (4.5%) developed a deep infection requiring invasive treatment. Two patients (1.8%) required an eventual amputation for an infected nonunion; both of these patients sustained an initially closed fracture. Overall limb salvage at two years was 98.2%.

Conclusion: The TSF remains an established option in the surgical management of patients with complex injuries to the tibia, with good rates of limb salvage within this challenging patient subgroup.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信