内镜鼻窦手术中不同麻醉方法对出血和预后的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Xiaoquan Wei, Mengsheng Yang, Dan Li, Zekun Lang, Haijun Zhang
{"title":"内镜鼻窦手术中不同麻醉方法对出血和预后的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价。","authors":"Xiaoquan Wei, Mengsheng Yang, Dan Li, Zekun Lang, Haijun Zhang","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18980-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this paper was to assess whether intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia will affect intraoperative bleeding and prognosis in patients with endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science were systematically searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of various anesthesia methods on patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery from January 1, 1990, to July 1, 2024. The primary outcome measures comprised intraoperative blood loss and scoring systems evaluating bleeding in the surgical field. Secondary outcome measures included common postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, and pain, among others. Data synthesis was conducted using risk ratios or standardized mean differences, along with 95% confidence intervals. The original study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359773).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 1472 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Lower blood loss is found during intravenous anesthesia compared to inhalation anesthesia (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.18; P=0.005; I<sup>2</sup>=90%). The results of several scoring systems for assessing surgical field bleeding have shown the superiority of intravenous anesthesia. In addition, the duration of operation under intravenous anesthesia is shorter (SMD=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.26; P=0.01; I<sup>2</sup>=46%). However, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the inhalation anesthesia group was lower than that in the intravenous anesthesia group (RR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.93; P=0.01; I<sup>2</sup>=0). Univariate meta-regression analysis indicated that age may be one source of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss and operation time are more advantageous in intravenous anesthesia. Anesthesiologists and surgeons should make individualized decisions based on the patient's condition and formulate a comprehensive plan during the perioperative period to bring greater benefits to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different anesthesia methods on bleeding and prognosis in endoscopic sinus surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoquan Wei, Mengsheng Yang, Dan Li, Zekun Lang, Haijun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18980-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this paper was to assess whether intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia will affect intraoperative bleeding and prognosis in patients with endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science were systematically searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of various anesthesia methods on patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery from January 1, 1990, to July 1, 2024. The primary outcome measures comprised intraoperative blood loss and scoring systems evaluating bleeding in the surgical field. Secondary outcome measures included common postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, and pain, among others. Data synthesis was conducted using risk ratios or standardized mean differences, along with 95% confidence intervals. The original study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359773).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 1472 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Lower blood loss is found during intravenous anesthesia compared to inhalation anesthesia (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.18; P=0.005; I<sup>2</sup>=90%). The results of several scoring systems for assessing surgical field bleeding have shown the superiority of intravenous anesthesia. In addition, the duration of operation under intravenous anesthesia is shorter (SMD=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.26; P=0.01; I<sup>2</sup>=46%). However, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the inhalation anesthesia group was lower than that in the intravenous anesthesia group (RR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.93; P=0.01; I<sup>2</sup>=0). Univariate meta-regression analysis indicated that age may be one source of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss and operation time are more advantageous in intravenous anesthesia. Anesthesiologists and surgeons should make individualized decisions based on the patient's condition and formulate a comprehensive plan during the perioperative period to bring greater benefits to the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18980-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18980-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本文旨在探讨静脉麻醉和吸入麻醉对内镜鼻窦手术患者术中出血及预后的影响。证据获取:系统检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,以确定从1990年1月1日至2024年7月1日期间调查各种麻醉方法对内镜鼻窦手术患者影响的相关随机对照试验。主要结局指标包括术中出血量和评估手术野出血的评分系统。次要结局指标包括常见的术后并发症,如恶心、呕吐和疼痛等。使用风险比或标准化平均差以及95%置信区间进行数据综合。原始研究方案在PROSPERO进行前瞻性注册(CRD42022359773)。证据综合:本荟萃分析共纳入26项随机对照试验,涉及1472例患者。与吸入麻醉相比,静脉麻醉的失血量更低(SMD, 0.69;95% CI, 0.21 ~ 1.18;P = 0.005;I2 = 90%)。几个评估手术野出血的评分系统的结果显示静脉麻醉的优越性。此外,静脉麻醉下的手术时间更短(SMD=0.15;95% CI: 0.03 ~ 0.26;P = 0.01;I2 = 46%)。但吸入麻醉组术后恶心、呕吐的发生风险低于静脉麻醉组(RR=0.72;95% CI: 0.55 ~ 0.93;P = 0.01;I2 = 0)。单因素荟萃回归分析表明,年龄可能是异质性的一个来源。结论:术中出血量和手术时间对静脉麻醉更有利。麻醉医师和外科医生应根据患者的病情做出个性化的决定,并在围手术期制定一个全面的计划,以给患者带来更大的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of different anesthesia methods on bleeding and prognosis in endoscopic sinus surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: The aim of this paper was to assess whether intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia will affect intraoperative bleeding and prognosis in patients with endoscopic sinus surgery.

Evidence acquisition: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science were systematically searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of various anesthesia methods on patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery from January 1, 1990, to July 1, 2024. The primary outcome measures comprised intraoperative blood loss and scoring systems evaluating bleeding in the surgical field. Secondary outcome measures included common postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, and pain, among others. Data synthesis was conducted using risk ratios or standardized mean differences, along with 95% confidence intervals. The original study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359773).

Evidence synthesis: A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 1472 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Lower blood loss is found during intravenous anesthesia compared to inhalation anesthesia (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.18; P=0.005; I2=90%). The results of several scoring systems for assessing surgical field bleeding have shown the superiority of intravenous anesthesia. In addition, the duration of operation under intravenous anesthesia is shorter (SMD=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.26; P=0.01; I2=46%). However, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the inhalation anesthesia group was lower than that in the intravenous anesthesia group (RR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.93; P=0.01; I2=0). Univariate meta-regression analysis indicated that age may be one source of heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Intraoperative blood loss and operation time are more advantageous in intravenous anesthesia. Anesthesiologists and surgeons should make individualized decisions based on the patient's condition and formulate a comprehensive plan during the perioperative period to bring greater benefits to the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信