环境表面多药耐药菌培养和非培养回收拭子方法的评价。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ahmed Babiker, Julia Van Riel, Sarah Lohsen, Alex Page, Amanda Strudwick, Eli Wilber, Michael Woodworth, Sarah Satola
{"title":"环境表面多药耐药菌培养和非培养回收拭子方法的评价。","authors":"Ahmed Babiker, Julia Van Riel, Sarah Lohsen, Alex Page, Amanda Strudwick, Eli Wilber, Michael Woodworth, Sarah Satola","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sponge-Sticks (SS) and ESwabs are frequently utilized for detection of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in the environment. Head-to-head comparisons of SS and ESwabs across recovery endpoints are limited.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We compared MDRO culture and non-culture-based recovery from (1) ESwabs, (2) cellulose-containing SS (CS), and (3) polyurethane-containing SS (PCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Known quantities of each MDRO were pipetted on a stainless-steel surface and swabbed by each method. Samples were processed, cultured, and underwent colony counting. DNA was extracted from sample eluates, quantified, and underwent metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). MDROs underwent whole genome sequencing (WGS). MDRO recovery from paired patient perirectal and PCS-collected environmental samples from clinical studies was determined.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory experiment, tertiary medical center, and long-term acute care facility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Culture-based recovery varied across MDRO taxa, it was highest for vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> and lowest for carbapenem-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (CRPA). Culture-based recovery was significantly higher for SS compared to ESwabs except for CRPA, where all methods performed poorly. Nucleic acid recovery varied across methods and MDRO taxa. Integrated WGS and mNGS analysis resulted in successful detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, construction of high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes, and detection of MDRO genomes in environmental metagenomes across methods. In paired patient and environmental samples, multidrug-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa (</i>MDRP) environmental recovery was notably poor (0/123), despite detection of MDRP in patient samples (20/123).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the use of SS for the recovery of MDROs. Pitfalls of each method should be noted. Method selection should be driven by MDRO target and desired endpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of swabbing methods for culture and non-culture-based recovery of multidrug-resistant organisms from environmental surfaces.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Babiker, Julia Van Riel, Sarah Lohsen, Alex Page, Amanda Strudwick, Eli Wilber, Michael Woodworth, Sarah Satola\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2025.10214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sponge-Sticks (SS) and ESwabs are frequently utilized for detection of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in the environment. Head-to-head comparisons of SS and ESwabs across recovery endpoints are limited.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We compared MDRO culture and non-culture-based recovery from (1) ESwabs, (2) cellulose-containing SS (CS), and (3) polyurethane-containing SS (PCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Known quantities of each MDRO were pipetted on a stainless-steel surface and swabbed by each method. Samples were processed, cultured, and underwent colony counting. DNA was extracted from sample eluates, quantified, and underwent metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). MDROs underwent whole genome sequencing (WGS). MDRO recovery from paired patient perirectal and PCS-collected environmental samples from clinical studies was determined.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory experiment, tertiary medical center, and long-term acute care facility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Culture-based recovery varied across MDRO taxa, it was highest for vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> and lowest for carbapenem-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (CRPA). Culture-based recovery was significantly higher for SS compared to ESwabs except for CRPA, where all methods performed poorly. Nucleic acid recovery varied across methods and MDRO taxa. Integrated WGS and mNGS analysis resulted in successful detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, construction of high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes, and detection of MDRO genomes in environmental metagenomes across methods. In paired patient and environmental samples, multidrug-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa (</i>MDRP) environmental recovery was notably poor (0/123), despite detection of MDRP in patient samples (20/123).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the use of SS for the recovery of MDROs. Pitfalls of each method should be noted. Method selection should be driven by MDRO target and desired endpoint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422522/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:海绵棒(SS)和eswab常用于环境中多重耐药生物(mdro)的检测。SS和eswab在恢复端点上的直接比较是有限的。设计:我们比较了MDRO培养和非培养的回收(1)ESwabs,(2)含纤维素的SS (CS)和(3)含聚氨酯的SS (PCS)。方法:将已知数量的MDRO移液于不锈钢表面,并按每种方法擦拭。对样品进行处理、培养并进行菌落计数。从样品洗脱液中提取DNA,定量,并进行宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)。对MDROs进行全基因组测序(WGS)。从配对的患者直肠周围和临床研究中收集的pcs环境样本中确定MDRO的回收率。环境:实验室实验、三级医疗中心、长期急症护理机构。结果:不同MDRO分类群的培养回收率不同,耐万古霉素肠球菌的培养回收率最高,耐碳青霉烯假单胞菌(CRPA)的培养回收率最低。除CRPA外,SS的基于培养的回收率明显高于ESwabs,所有方法都表现不佳。核酸恢复在不同的方法和MDRO分类群中存在差异。综合WGS和mNGS分析,成功检测了抗菌素耐药基因,构建了高质量的宏基因组组装基因组,并跨方法检测了环境宏基因组中的MDRO基因组。在配对的患者和环境样本中,尽管在患者样本中检测到MDRP(20/123),但耐多药铜绿假单胞菌(MDRP)的环境恢复明显较差(0/123)。结论:我们的研究结果支持SS用于MDROs的恢复。应该注意每种方法的缺陷。方法选择应由MDRO目标和期望的终点驱动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of swabbing methods for culture and non-culture-based recovery of multidrug-resistant organisms from environmental surfaces.

Objectives: Sponge-Sticks (SS) and ESwabs are frequently utilized for detection of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in the environment. Head-to-head comparisons of SS and ESwabs across recovery endpoints are limited.

Design: We compared MDRO culture and non-culture-based recovery from (1) ESwabs, (2) cellulose-containing SS (CS), and (3) polyurethane-containing SS (PCS).

Methods: Known quantities of each MDRO were pipetted on a stainless-steel surface and swabbed by each method. Samples were processed, cultured, and underwent colony counting. DNA was extracted from sample eluates, quantified, and underwent metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). MDROs underwent whole genome sequencing (WGS). MDRO recovery from paired patient perirectal and PCS-collected environmental samples from clinical studies was determined.

Setting: Laboratory experiment, tertiary medical center, and long-term acute care facility.

Results: Culture-based recovery varied across MDRO taxa, it was highest for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and lowest for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Culture-based recovery was significantly higher for SS compared to ESwabs except for CRPA, where all methods performed poorly. Nucleic acid recovery varied across methods and MDRO taxa. Integrated WGS and mNGS analysis resulted in successful detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, construction of high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes, and detection of MDRO genomes in environmental metagenomes across methods. In paired patient and environmental samples, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP) environmental recovery was notably poor (0/123), despite detection of MDRP in patient samples (20/123).

Conclusions: Our findings support the use of SS for the recovery of MDROs. Pitfalls of each method should be noted. Method selection should be driven by MDRO target and desired endpoint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信