头部旋转对瘫痪、麻醉患者LMA-ProtectorTM和i-gel®口咽漏压的影响:一项随机对照研究

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_1164_24
Gauri Sharma, Jaspal Singh Dali, Megha Soni, Rashmi Virmani
{"title":"头部旋转对瘫痪、麻醉患者LMA-ProtectorTM和i-gel®口咽漏压的影响:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Gauri Sharma, Jaspal Singh Dali, Megha Soni, Rashmi Virmani","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_1164_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The most important parameter to provide adequate and safe ventilation for the supralaryngeal airway device (SAD) is its sealing effectivity measured as oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP). Various studies have been conducted to elucidate the effects of head extension and flexion on the OPLP of SAD devices; however, the literature regarding the influence of head rotation on OPLP is limited. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the influence of head rotation on the OPLP of LMA-Protector<sup>TM</sup> with i-gel® in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients of either gender scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two Group, namely group L and Group I. Ten min following the induction of pneumoperitoneum, OPLP was recorded at 0°, 30°, and 60° left head rotation. The insertion characteristics of both SADs were also recorded and compared. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using the unpaired <i>t</i>-test. Categorical variables were analysed using either the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A paired <i>t</i>-test was used for the group analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OPLP of Group L and Group I was comparable in neutral and 30° head rotation. OPLP was significantly higher in the LMA-Protector compared to the i-gel® at 60° head rotation (<i>P</i> = 0.041). In both the study groups, there was a significant decrease in OPLP when the head was turned from neutral to 60°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OPLP of Group L and Group I was comparable in neutral and 30° head rotation. LMA-Protector<sup>TM</sup> offered better OPLP as compared to i-gel® at 60° head rotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 7","pages":"681-686"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of head rotation on oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA-Protector<sup>TM</sup> and i-gel® in paralysed, anaesthetised patients: A randomised comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Gauri Sharma, Jaspal Singh Dali, Megha Soni, Rashmi Virmani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_1164_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The most important parameter to provide adequate and safe ventilation for the supralaryngeal airway device (SAD) is its sealing effectivity measured as oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP). Various studies have been conducted to elucidate the effects of head extension and flexion on the OPLP of SAD devices; however, the literature regarding the influence of head rotation on OPLP is limited. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the influence of head rotation on the OPLP of LMA-Protector<sup>TM</sup> with i-gel® in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients of either gender scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two Group, namely group L and Group I. Ten min following the induction of pneumoperitoneum, OPLP was recorded at 0°, 30°, and 60° left head rotation. The insertion characteristics of both SADs were also recorded and compared. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using the unpaired <i>t</i>-test. Categorical variables were analysed using either the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A paired <i>t</i>-test was used for the group analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OPLP of Group L and Group I was comparable in neutral and 30° head rotation. OPLP was significantly higher in the LMA-Protector compared to the i-gel® at 60° head rotation (<i>P</i> = 0.041). In both the study groups, there was a significant decrease in OPLP when the head was turned from neutral to 60°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OPLP of Group L and Group I was comparable in neutral and 30° head rotation. LMA-Protector<sup>TM</sup> offered better OPLP as compared to i-gel® at 60° head rotation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"69 7\",\"pages\":\"681-686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1164_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1164_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:为咽上气道装置(SAD)提供充分、安全通气的最重要参数是其密封效果,即口咽漏压(OPLP)。已经进行了各种研究来阐明头部伸展和屈曲对SAD装置的OPLP的影响;然而,关于头部旋转对OPLP影响的文献有限。该研究的主要目的是评估和比较头部旋转对瘫痪、麻醉患者LMA-ProtectorTM和i-gel®的OPLP的影响。方法:择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者60例,男女均可,随机分为L组和i组。气腹诱导后10min,记录左旋头部0°、30°和60°时的OPLP。记录和比较两种SADs的插入特性。正态分布的连续变量采用非配对t检验进行比较。使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验对分类变量进行分析。分组分析采用配对t检验。结果:L组和I组在中性和30°头部旋转时的OPLP具有可比性。在头部旋转60°时,LMA-Protector的OPLP显著高于i-gel®(P = 0.041)。在两个研究组中,当头部从中性转到60°时,OPLP显著下降。结论:L组和I组在中性和30°头部旋转时的OPLP具有可比性。与i-gel®相比,LMA-ProtectorTM在头部旋转60°时提供了更好的OPLP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of head rotation on oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA-ProtectorTM and i-gel® in paralysed, anaesthetised patients: A randomised comparative study.

Background and aims: The most important parameter to provide adequate and safe ventilation for the supralaryngeal airway device (SAD) is its sealing effectivity measured as oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP). Various studies have been conducted to elucidate the effects of head extension and flexion on the OPLP of SAD devices; however, the literature regarding the influence of head rotation on OPLP is limited. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the influence of head rotation on the OPLP of LMA-ProtectorTM with i-gel® in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.

Methods: Sixty patients of either gender scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two Group, namely group L and Group I. Ten min following the induction of pneumoperitoneum, OPLP was recorded at 0°, 30°, and 60° left head rotation. The insertion characteristics of both SADs were also recorded and compared. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using the unpaired t-test. Categorical variables were analysed using either the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A paired t-test was used for the group analysis.

Results: OPLP of Group L and Group I was comparable in neutral and 30° head rotation. OPLP was significantly higher in the LMA-Protector compared to the i-gel® at 60° head rotation (P = 0.041). In both the study groups, there was a significant decrease in OPLP when the head was turned from neutral to 60°.

Conclusion: OPLP of Group L and Group I was comparable in neutral and 30° head rotation. LMA-ProtectorTM offered better OPLP as compared to i-gel® at 60° head rotation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信