评估手外科医生对肱二头肌远端肌腱部分撕裂患者的MRI撕裂率进行可靠分类的能力。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-07-14 DOI:10.1177/15589447251352005
Kyle Plusch, Gabriel I Onor, Jack Abboudi, Daren Aita, Moody Kwok, Frederic Liss, Pedro K Beredjiklian
{"title":"评估手外科医生对肱二头肌远端肌腱部分撕裂患者的MRI撕裂率进行可靠分类的能力。","authors":"Kyle Plusch, Gabriel I Onor, Jack Abboudi, Daren Aita, Moody Kwok, Frederic Liss, Pedro K Beredjiklian","doi":"10.1177/15589447251352005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with partial distal biceps tendon tears (PDBT) have both surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. The percentage of the tendon that has torn plays an important role in decision making, although this can be difficult to reliably measure, even with advanced imaging. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of hand surgeons within our practice in determining the percentage of the distal biceps tendon that has torn based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with PDBT. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively identified 50 patients at our institution who received an MRI for a distal biceps injury and received a diagnosis of PDBT. All of these 50 patients' initial elbow MRI images were reviewed by 4 fellowship-trained hand and upper extremity surgeons within our practice. Each reviewer classified the partial tear into 1 of 3 categories: less than 1/3 torn, between 1/3 and 2/3 torn, and greater than 2/3 torn. In addition, the presence or absence of an FABS view (elbow flexed, shoulder abducted, forearm supinated) was identified. Interobserver agreement and reliability were calculated with Cohen's kappa test. <b>Results:</b> One patient's images were not available in our electronic medical record, resulting in 49 elbow MRIs for PDBT reviewed by 4 reviewers. The flexion, abduction, supination view was available for 11 patients. The 4 reviewers had an overall agreement of 51.4%, with a kappa statistic of 0.27, indicating \"fair\" agreement. Notably, the reviewers only fully agreed on their PDBT grading for 12 patients (24%), and 10 patients received scores across all 3 categories. Among patients with FABS view available, interobserver agreement increased to 62.1%, with a kappa statistic of 0.43, indicating \"moderate agreement.\" <b>Conclusions:</b> Reliable identification of the degree of tearing in partial distal biceps injuries is difficult based on MRI alone. The presence of an FABS view increased both agreement and reliability between the reviewing surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251352005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Ability of Hand Surgeons to Reliably Classify the Percentage of Tearing Based on MRI for Patients With a Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tear.\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Plusch, Gabriel I Onor, Jack Abboudi, Daren Aita, Moody Kwok, Frederic Liss, Pedro K Beredjiklian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447251352005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with partial distal biceps tendon tears (PDBT) have both surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. The percentage of the tendon that has torn plays an important role in decision making, although this can be difficult to reliably measure, even with advanced imaging. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of hand surgeons within our practice in determining the percentage of the distal biceps tendon that has torn based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with PDBT. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively identified 50 patients at our institution who received an MRI for a distal biceps injury and received a diagnosis of PDBT. All of these 50 patients' initial elbow MRI images were reviewed by 4 fellowship-trained hand and upper extremity surgeons within our practice. Each reviewer classified the partial tear into 1 of 3 categories: less than 1/3 torn, between 1/3 and 2/3 torn, and greater than 2/3 torn. In addition, the presence or absence of an FABS view (elbow flexed, shoulder abducted, forearm supinated) was identified. Interobserver agreement and reliability were calculated with Cohen's kappa test. <b>Results:</b> One patient's images were not available in our electronic medical record, resulting in 49 elbow MRIs for PDBT reviewed by 4 reviewers. The flexion, abduction, supination view was available for 11 patients. The 4 reviewers had an overall agreement of 51.4%, with a kappa statistic of 0.27, indicating \\\"fair\\\" agreement. Notably, the reviewers only fully agreed on their PDBT grading for 12 patients (24%), and 10 patients received scores across all 3 categories. Among patients with FABS view available, interobserver agreement increased to 62.1%, with a kappa statistic of 0.43, indicating \\\"moderate agreement.\\\" <b>Conclusions:</b> Reliable identification of the degree of tearing in partial distal biceps injuries is difficult based on MRI alone. The presence of an FABS view increased both agreement and reliability between the reviewing surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15589447251352005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259584/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251352005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251352005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肱二头肌远端部分肌腱撕裂(PDBT)的患者有手术和非手术两种治疗选择。肌腱撕裂的百分比在决策中起着重要作用,尽管这很难可靠地测量,即使有先进的成像技术。本研究的目的是评估在我们的实践中,手外科医生根据磁共振成像(MRI)确定PDBT患者远端肱二头肌腱撕裂百分比的可靠性。方法:我们回顾性地确定了我院50例因肱二头肌远端损伤接受MRI检查并被诊断为PDBT的患者。所有这50名患者最初的肘部MRI图像由我们的4名培训过的手肢和上肢外科医生审查。每位审稿人将部分撕裂分为以下3类中的1类:小于1/3撕裂,在1/3至2/3撕裂之间,大于2/3撕裂。此外,确定是否存在FABS视图(肘关节屈曲,肩部外展,前臂旋后)。采用Cohen’s kappa检验计算观察者间的一致性和信度。结果:1例患者的图像在我们的电子病历中不可用,导致4位评论者审阅了49例肘部PDBT mri。11例患者均有屈曲、外展、旋后位。4位审稿人的总体一致性为51.4%,kappa统计量为0.27,为“公平”一致性。值得注意的是,评论者仅对12名患者(24%)的PDBT评分完全同意,10名患者在所有3个类别中都获得了分数。在可获得FABS视图的患者中,观察者之间的一致性增加到62.1%,kappa统计量为0.43,表明“中度一致”。结论:仅凭MRI很难可靠地识别肱二头肌远端部分损伤的撕裂程度。FABS视图的存在增加了回顾外科医生之间的一致性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Ability of Hand Surgeons to Reliably Classify the Percentage of Tearing Based on MRI for Patients With a Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tear.

Background: Patients with partial distal biceps tendon tears (PDBT) have both surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. The percentage of the tendon that has torn plays an important role in decision making, although this can be difficult to reliably measure, even with advanced imaging. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of hand surgeons within our practice in determining the percentage of the distal biceps tendon that has torn based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with PDBT. Methods: We retrospectively identified 50 patients at our institution who received an MRI for a distal biceps injury and received a diagnosis of PDBT. All of these 50 patients' initial elbow MRI images were reviewed by 4 fellowship-trained hand and upper extremity surgeons within our practice. Each reviewer classified the partial tear into 1 of 3 categories: less than 1/3 torn, between 1/3 and 2/3 torn, and greater than 2/3 torn. In addition, the presence or absence of an FABS view (elbow flexed, shoulder abducted, forearm supinated) was identified. Interobserver agreement and reliability were calculated with Cohen's kappa test. Results: One patient's images were not available in our electronic medical record, resulting in 49 elbow MRIs for PDBT reviewed by 4 reviewers. The flexion, abduction, supination view was available for 11 patients. The 4 reviewers had an overall agreement of 51.4%, with a kappa statistic of 0.27, indicating "fair" agreement. Notably, the reviewers only fully agreed on their PDBT grading for 12 patients (24%), and 10 patients received scores across all 3 categories. Among patients with FABS view available, interobserver agreement increased to 62.1%, with a kappa statistic of 0.43, indicating "moderate agreement." Conclusions: Reliable identification of the degree of tearing in partial distal biceps injuries is difficult based on MRI alone. The presence of an FABS view increased both agreement and reliability between the reviewing surgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信