肝细胞癌肺分流在166Ho-Scout影像学上的评价及临床意义。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Evelyn Vranken, An De Crop, Victor Nuttens, Ruben Vandenbulcke, Tom Dewaele, Thomas Ryckaert, Jochen Decaestecker, Sofie De Meulder, Pieter De Bondt
{"title":"肝细胞癌肺分流在166Ho-Scout影像学上的评价及临床意义。","authors":"Evelyn Vranken, An De Crop, Victor Nuttens, Ruben Vandenbulcke, Tom Dewaele, Thomas Ryckaert, Jochen Decaestecker, Sofie De Meulder, Pieter De Bondt","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00783-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Prediction of posttreatment lung mean dose (LMD) during liver radioembolization (RE) work-up is essential for risk evaluation of radiation pneumonitis, especially when treating large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) where the chance of arteriovenous shunting is not negligible. In case of holmium-166-([<sup>166</sup>Ho])-RE, either [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]TcMAA or <sup>166</sup>Ho-microspheres can be used as scout tracers. Safety of use of <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout has been demonstrated previously, but, to our notice, evaluation of lung radiation dose due to <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout activity in case of significant lung shunting has not been described so far. Therefore, a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the presence of pulmonary shunting in HCC patients influencing therapeutical approach and to assess lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose in these patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-nine HCC patients referred for RE were retrospectively evaluated. All work-ups were performed with <sup>166</sup>Ho-microspheres. Scout imaging consisted of a hybrid SPECT/CT acquisition covering the thoraco-abdominal region. As mentioned in the manufacturer's instruction for use of <sup>166</sup>Ho-microspheres, the possibility of > 30 Gy lung radiation exposure in a single treatment is withheld as contra-indication for RE. In patients with lung shunt resulting in predicted posttreatment LMD > 30 Gy, lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose due to patient-specific injected activity was calculated, alongside two hypothetical scenarios: lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose related to patient's lung shunt fraction (LSF) assuming administration of leaflet prescribed maximum <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout activity and in case of 100% LSF according to patient-specific injected scout activity. Afterwards, these patients were followed for 3 months or till death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 29 patients, average predicted posttreatment LMD was 10.0 Gy (range 0.1-138.9 Gy), four of them revealing predicted LMD > 30 Gy. Based on patient-specific injected <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout activity (range 100-200 MBq), average lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose of 0.5 Gy (range 0.1-0.8 Gy) was calculated in these 4 patients. Assuming administration of leaflet prescribed maximum activity of 250 MBq, average lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose would be 0.9 Gy (range 0.4-1.7 Gy). In case of a 100% LSF, average lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose would be 2.2 Gy (range 1.5-2.7 Gy) due to patient-specific scout activity. In these 4 patients, RE was denied and alternative treatment was started. No pulmonary adverse events related to <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports previous reports that <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout is a safe alternative to [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]TcMAA -scout and underlines the importance of predicting posttreatment LMD when treating large HCC since 13.8% of our patient group presented arteriovenous shunting with impact on treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment and clinical relevance of pulmonary shunt on <sup>166</sup>Ho-Scout Imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Evelyn Vranken, An De Crop, Victor Nuttens, Ruben Vandenbulcke, Tom Dewaele, Thomas Ryckaert, Jochen Decaestecker, Sofie De Meulder, Pieter De Bondt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40658-025-00783-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Prediction of posttreatment lung mean dose (LMD) during liver radioembolization (RE) work-up is essential for risk evaluation of radiation pneumonitis, especially when treating large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) where the chance of arteriovenous shunting is not negligible. In case of holmium-166-([<sup>166</sup>Ho])-RE, either [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]TcMAA or <sup>166</sup>Ho-microspheres can be used as scout tracers. Safety of use of <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout has been demonstrated previously, but, to our notice, evaluation of lung radiation dose due to <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout activity in case of significant lung shunting has not been described so far. Therefore, a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the presence of pulmonary shunting in HCC patients influencing therapeutical approach and to assess lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose in these patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-nine HCC patients referred for RE were retrospectively evaluated. All work-ups were performed with <sup>166</sup>Ho-microspheres. Scout imaging consisted of a hybrid SPECT/CT acquisition covering the thoraco-abdominal region. As mentioned in the manufacturer's instruction for use of <sup>166</sup>Ho-microspheres, the possibility of > 30 Gy lung radiation exposure in a single treatment is withheld as contra-indication for RE. In patients with lung shunt resulting in predicted posttreatment LMD > 30 Gy, lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose due to patient-specific injected activity was calculated, alongside two hypothetical scenarios: lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose related to patient's lung shunt fraction (LSF) assuming administration of leaflet prescribed maximum <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout activity and in case of 100% LSF according to patient-specific injected scout activity. Afterwards, these patients were followed for 3 months or till death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 29 patients, average predicted posttreatment LMD was 10.0 Gy (range 0.1-138.9 Gy), four of them revealing predicted LMD > 30 Gy. Based on patient-specific injected <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout activity (range 100-200 MBq), average lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose of 0.5 Gy (range 0.1-0.8 Gy) was calculated in these 4 patients. Assuming administration of leaflet prescribed maximum activity of 250 MBq, average lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose would be 0.9 Gy (range 0.4-1.7 Gy). In case of a 100% LSF, average lung <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout dose would be 2.2 Gy (range 1.5-2.7 Gy) due to patient-specific scout activity. In these 4 patients, RE was denied and alternative treatment was started. No pulmonary adverse events related to <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports previous reports that <sup>166</sup>Ho-scout is a safe alternative to [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]TcMAA -scout and underlines the importance of predicting posttreatment LMD when treating large HCC since 13.8% of our patient group presented arteriovenous shunting with impact on treatment planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259507/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00783-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00783-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在肝放射栓塞(RE)检查期间预测治疗后肺平均剂量(LMD)对放射性肺炎的风险评估至关重要,特别是在治疗大肝癌(HCC)时,其动静脉分流的机会不容忽视。以166-([166Ho])- re为例,[99mTc]TcMAA或166Ho微球均可作为侦察示踪剂。先前已经证明了使用166Ho-scout的安全性,但是,我们注意到,迄今为止尚未描述在明显肺分流的情况下,166Ho-scout活性引起的肺辐射剂量的评估。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估HCC患者中肺分流的存在对治疗方法的影响,并评估这些患者的肺166Ho-scout剂量。材料和方法:对29例肝细胞癌患者进行回顾性评价。所有的工作都用166ho微球进行。Scout成像包括覆盖胸腹区域的混合SPECT/CT采集。正如生产商的166ho -微球使用说明中提到的,在单次治疗中,肺辐射暴露> 30 Gy的可能性被保留为RE的禁忌症。在肺分流导致治疗后预测LMD > 30 Gy的患者中,计算了由于患者特异性注射活性导致的肺166Ho-scout剂量,以及两种假设情况:肺166Ho-scout剂量与患者肺分流分数(LSF)相关,假设给药单张规定最大166Ho-scout活性,如果LSF为100%,则根据患者特异性注射scout活性。随访3个月至死亡。结果:29例患者治疗后平均预测LMD为10.0 Gy (0.1 ~ 138.9 Gy),其中4例患者预测LMD为0 ~ 30 Gy。根据患者特异性注射166Ho-scout活性(范围100-200 MBq),计算4例患者肺平均166Ho-scout剂量0.5 Gy(范围0.1-0.8 Gy)。假设给药单张规定的最大活度为250 MBq,肺平均166Ho-scout剂量为0.9 Gy(范围为0.4-1.7 Gy)。在100% LSF的情况下,由于患者特异性的侦察活动,肺166Ho-scout的平均剂量为2.2 Gy (1.5-2.7 Gy)。在这4例患者中,RE被拒绝,并开始替代治疗。没有记录与166Ho-scout相关的肺部不良事件。结论:本研究支持了先前的报道,即166Ho-scout是[99mTc]TcMAA -scout的安全替代品,并强调了在治疗大型HCC时预测治疗后LMD的重要性,因为我们的患者组中有13.8%出现动静脉分流,影响治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment and clinical relevance of pulmonary shunt on <sup>166</sup>Ho-Scout Imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Assessment and clinical relevance of pulmonary shunt on <sup>166</sup>Ho-Scout Imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Assessment and clinical relevance of pulmonary shunt on 166Ho-Scout Imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aim: Prediction of posttreatment lung mean dose (LMD) during liver radioembolization (RE) work-up is essential for risk evaluation of radiation pneumonitis, especially when treating large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) where the chance of arteriovenous shunting is not negligible. In case of holmium-166-([166Ho])-RE, either [99mTc]TcMAA or 166Ho-microspheres can be used as scout tracers. Safety of use of 166Ho-scout has been demonstrated previously, but, to our notice, evaluation of lung radiation dose due to 166Ho-scout activity in case of significant lung shunting has not been described so far. Therefore, a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the presence of pulmonary shunting in HCC patients influencing therapeutical approach and to assess lung 166Ho-scout dose in these patients.

Materials and methods: Twenty-nine HCC patients referred for RE were retrospectively evaluated. All work-ups were performed with 166Ho-microspheres. Scout imaging consisted of a hybrid SPECT/CT acquisition covering the thoraco-abdominal region. As mentioned in the manufacturer's instruction for use of 166Ho-microspheres, the possibility of > 30 Gy lung radiation exposure in a single treatment is withheld as contra-indication for RE. In patients with lung shunt resulting in predicted posttreatment LMD > 30 Gy, lung 166Ho-scout dose due to patient-specific injected activity was calculated, alongside two hypothetical scenarios: lung 166Ho-scout dose related to patient's lung shunt fraction (LSF) assuming administration of leaflet prescribed maximum 166Ho-scout activity and in case of 100% LSF according to patient-specific injected scout activity. Afterwards, these patients were followed for 3 months or till death.

Results: In the 29 patients, average predicted posttreatment LMD was 10.0 Gy (range 0.1-138.9 Gy), four of them revealing predicted LMD > 30 Gy. Based on patient-specific injected 166Ho-scout activity (range 100-200 MBq), average lung 166Ho-scout dose of 0.5 Gy (range 0.1-0.8 Gy) was calculated in these 4 patients. Assuming administration of leaflet prescribed maximum activity of 250 MBq, average lung 166Ho-scout dose would be 0.9 Gy (range 0.4-1.7 Gy). In case of a 100% LSF, average lung 166Ho-scout dose would be 2.2 Gy (range 1.5-2.7 Gy) due to patient-specific scout activity. In these 4 patients, RE was denied and alternative treatment was started. No pulmonary adverse events related to 166Ho-scout were recorded.

Conclusion: This study supports previous reports that 166Ho-scout is a safe alternative to [99mTc]TcMAA -scout and underlines the importance of predicting posttreatment LMD when treating large HCC since 13.8% of our patient group presented arteriovenous shunting with impact on treatment planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信