使用医疗保险索赔数据的实验室检测利用分析:推进全国诊断管理监测系统。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Se-Eun Koo, Jiyeon Kim, Kuenyoul Park
{"title":"使用医疗保险索赔数据的实验室检测利用分析:推进全国诊断管理监测系统。","authors":"Se-Eun Koo, Jiyeon Kim, Kuenyoul Park","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diagnostic stewardship aims to optimize laboratory testing practices by ensuring appropriate test utilization while minimizing unnecessary testing. However, the nationwide monitoring systems for laboratory test utilization remain underdeveloped. In this study, we analyzed nationwide health insurance claims data to identify inappropriate test utilization patterns and inform diagnostic stewardship interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the health insurance claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea from January 2018 to December 2023. Three laboratory tests with concerns were evaluated. Inappropriate test utilization was classified based on adherence to recommended methodologies and institutional testing practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of tuberculosis cultures performed using both liquid and solid media increased from 84.6 % in 2018 to 91.4 % in 2023; however, some institutions continued to perform >90 % of tests using only a single medium. Regional disparities were observed, with nonmetropolitan areas exhibiting higher rates of inappropriate tuberculosis testing. Stool ova and parasite tests showed a persistent reliance on direct smear-only methods. The correlation between endemic parasitic regions and the high proportions of direct smear-only tests suggests an urgent need for improved diagnostic methodologies. Despite longstanding recommendations against their use, bleeding time tests remained frequently ordered. The total number of bleeding time test claims exceeded 400,000 annually, with a limited decline over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic monitoring frameworks based on nationwide claims data can identify inappropriate test utilization and support diagnostic stewardship efforts by informing targeted interventions, thereby optimizing laboratory resource allocation and enhancing patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization analysis of laboratory tests using health insurance claims data: advancing nationwide diagnostic stewardship monitoring systems.\",\"authors\":\"Se-Eun Koo, Jiyeon Kim, Kuenyoul Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diagnostic stewardship aims to optimize laboratory testing practices by ensuring appropriate test utilization while minimizing unnecessary testing. However, the nationwide monitoring systems for laboratory test utilization remain underdeveloped. In this study, we analyzed nationwide health insurance claims data to identify inappropriate test utilization patterns and inform diagnostic stewardship interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the health insurance claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea from January 2018 to December 2023. Three laboratory tests with concerns were evaluated. Inappropriate test utilization was classified based on adherence to recommended methodologies and institutional testing practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of tuberculosis cultures performed using both liquid and solid media increased from 84.6 % in 2018 to 91.4 % in 2023; however, some institutions continued to perform >90 % of tests using only a single medium. Regional disparities were observed, with nonmetropolitan areas exhibiting higher rates of inappropriate tuberculosis testing. Stool ova and parasite tests showed a persistent reliance on direct smear-only methods. The correlation between endemic parasitic regions and the high proportions of direct smear-only tests suggests an urgent need for improved diagnostic methodologies. Despite longstanding recommendations against their use, bleeding time tests remained frequently ordered. The total number of bleeding time test claims exceeded 400,000 annually, with a limited decline over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic monitoring frameworks based on nationwide claims data can identify inappropriate test utilization and support diagnostic stewardship efforts by informing targeted interventions, thereby optimizing laboratory resource allocation and enhancing patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0641\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:诊断管理旨在优化实验室测试实践,确保适当的测试利用,同时尽量减少不必要的测试。然而,全国范围内的实验室检测利用监测系统仍然不发达。在这项研究中,我们分析了全国健康保险索赔数据,以确定不适当的测试使用模式,并告知诊断管理干预措施。方法:对2018年1月至2023年12月韩国健康保险审查和评估服务中心的健康保险索赔数据进行分析。对三个值得关注的实验室测试进行了评估。根据对推荐方法和机构测试实践的依从性对不适当的测试利用进行分类。结果:液体和固体培养基结核培养比例从2018年的84.6 %增加到2023年的91.4 %;然而,一些机构继续使用单一介质进行bbb90 %的测试。观察到地区差异,非大都市地区表现出更高的不适当结核病检测率。粪便卵和寄生虫检查显示持续依赖直接涂片法。地方性寄生虫区与高比例的直接涂片检测之间的相关性表明,迫切需要改进诊断方法。尽管长期以来建议不要使用出血时间测试,但仍经常要求进行出血时间测试。每年出血时间测试的索赔总数超过40万,随着时间的推移有有限的下降。结论:基于全国索赔数据的系统监测框架可以识别不适当的检测使用,并通过告知有针对性的干预措施来支持诊断管理工作,从而优化实验室资源分配并提高患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization analysis of laboratory tests using health insurance claims data: advancing nationwide diagnostic stewardship monitoring systems.

Objectives: Diagnostic stewardship aims to optimize laboratory testing practices by ensuring appropriate test utilization while minimizing unnecessary testing. However, the nationwide monitoring systems for laboratory test utilization remain underdeveloped. In this study, we analyzed nationwide health insurance claims data to identify inappropriate test utilization patterns and inform diagnostic stewardship interventions.

Methods: We analyzed the health insurance claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea from January 2018 to December 2023. Three laboratory tests with concerns were evaluated. Inappropriate test utilization was classified based on adherence to recommended methodologies and institutional testing practices.

Results: The proportion of tuberculosis cultures performed using both liquid and solid media increased from 84.6 % in 2018 to 91.4 % in 2023; however, some institutions continued to perform >90 % of tests using only a single medium. Regional disparities were observed, with nonmetropolitan areas exhibiting higher rates of inappropriate tuberculosis testing. Stool ova and parasite tests showed a persistent reliance on direct smear-only methods. The correlation between endemic parasitic regions and the high proportions of direct smear-only tests suggests an urgent need for improved diagnostic methodologies. Despite longstanding recommendations against their use, bleeding time tests remained frequently ordered. The total number of bleeding time test claims exceeded 400,000 annually, with a limited decline over time.

Conclusions: Systematic monitoring frameworks based on nationwide claims data can identify inappropriate test utilization and support diagnostic stewardship efforts by informing targeted interventions, thereby optimizing laboratory resource allocation and enhancing patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信