不同倾斜角度对儿童头部计算机断层扫描辐射剂量和图像质量的影响:一项模拟研究

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hongrong Xu, Jiawen Zhao, Zhen Xu, Bo Liu, Jinhua Cai
{"title":"不同倾斜角度对儿童头部计算机断层扫描辐射剂量和图像质量的影响:一项模拟研究","authors":"Hongrong Xu,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhao,&nbsp;Zhen Xu,&nbsp;Bo Liu,&nbsp;Jinhua Cai","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Various methods have been employed to reduce radiation dose and improve image quality in head computed tomography (CT); however, the impact of different head tilt angles on these factors remains underexplored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the effects of different head tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in head CT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>A pediatric anthropomorphic head phantom was scanned using dual-source CT at 18 different tilt angles, repeated 10 times at each angle. Image quality was assessed using mean CT (CT<sub>mean</sub>) attenuation values and image noise at six regions of interest (ROIs), while radiation dose was evaluated using volume CT dose index (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), and dose-length product (DLP). The scan lengths of the eyes and head were also recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and SSDE did not exhibit clear variation patterns with changes in head tilt angles, while DLP was in the lower region between −10° and 5°. Head scan lengths were relatively shorter between −10° and 5°, and eye scan lengths were relatively shorter between −10° and 0°. Except for the image noise of the right middle cranial fossa, no significant differences were found in CT<sub>mean</sub> values and image noise for the other ROIs between −10° and 0°.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings indicated that adjusting the head tilt angle within the range of −10° to 0° reduced both the head and eye scan lengths as well as the radiation dose, while preserving relatively stable image quality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of various tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head computed tomography: A phantom study\",\"authors\":\"Hongrong Xu,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhao,&nbsp;Zhen Xu,&nbsp;Bo Liu,&nbsp;Jinhua Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Various methods have been employed to reduce radiation dose and improve image quality in head computed tomography (CT); however, the impact of different head tilt angles on these factors remains underexplored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the effects of different head tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in head CT.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A pediatric anthropomorphic head phantom was scanned using dual-source CT at 18 different tilt angles, repeated 10 times at each angle. Image quality was assessed using mean CT (CT<sub>mean</sub>) attenuation values and image noise at six regions of interest (ROIs), while radiation dose was evaluated using volume CT dose index (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), and dose-length product (DLP). The scan lengths of the eyes and head were also recorded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and SSDE did not exhibit clear variation patterns with changes in head tilt angles, while DLP was in the lower region between −10° and 5°. Head scan lengths were relatively shorter between −10° and 5°, and eye scan lengths were relatively shorter between −10° and 0°. Except for the image noise of the right middle cranial fossa, no significant differences were found in CT<sub>mean</sub> values and image noise for the other ROIs between −10° and 0°.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings indicated that adjusting the head tilt angle within the range of −10° to 0° reduced both the head and eye scan lengths as well as the radiation dose, while preserving relatively stable image quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70177\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在头部计算机断层扫描(CT)中,为了降低辐射剂量和提高图像质量,已经采用了各种方法。然而,不同的头部倾斜角度对这些因素的影响仍未得到充分研究。目的探讨不同头部倾斜角度对头部CT辐射剂量和图像质量的影响。材料与方法采用双源CT对儿童拟人头部幻影进行18个不同角度的扫描,每个角度重复10次。使用CT平均衰减值(CTmean)和六个感兴趣区域(roi)的图像噪声来评估图像质量,而使用体积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol),尺寸特异性剂量估计(SSDE)和剂量-长度积(DLP)来评估辐射剂量。眼睛和头部的扫描长度也被记录下来。结果CTDIvol和SSDE随头部倾斜角度的变化没有明显的变化规律,而DLP则在- 10°~ 5°之间的较低区域。头部扫描长度在−10°和5°之间相对较短,眼睛扫描长度在−10°和0°之间相对较短。除右侧颅中窝的图像噪声外,其他roi在−10°和0°之间的ct均值和图像噪声均无显著差异。结论在- 10°~ 0°范围内调整头部倾斜角度,可以减少头眼扫描长度和辐射剂量,同时保持相对稳定的图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of various tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head computed tomography: A phantom study

Effects of various tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head computed tomography: A phantom study

Background

Various methods have been employed to reduce radiation dose and improve image quality in head computed tomography (CT); however, the impact of different head tilt angles on these factors remains underexplored.

Objective

To investigate the effects of different head tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in head CT.

Materials and methods

A pediatric anthropomorphic head phantom was scanned using dual-source CT at 18 different tilt angles, repeated 10 times at each angle. Image quality was assessed using mean CT (CTmean) attenuation values and image noise at six regions of interest (ROIs), while radiation dose was evaluated using volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), and dose-length product (DLP). The scan lengths of the eyes and head were also recorded.

Results

CTDIvol and SSDE did not exhibit clear variation patterns with changes in head tilt angles, while DLP was in the lower region between −10° and 5°. Head scan lengths were relatively shorter between −10° and 5°, and eye scan lengths were relatively shorter between −10° and 0°. Except for the image noise of the right middle cranial fossa, no significant differences were found in CTmean values and image noise for the other ROIs between −10° and 0°.

Conclusion

The findings indicated that adjusting the head tilt angle within the range of −10° to 0° reduced both the head and eye scan lengths as well as the radiation dose, while preserving relatively stable image quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信