在开放科学时代,重新审视与研究参与者分享总体结果的义务

Q2 Social Sciences
Katherine E. MacDuffie, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Stephanie A. Kraft
{"title":"在开放科学时代,重新审视与研究参与者分享总体结果的义务","authors":"Katherine E. MacDuffie,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Wilfond,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Kraft","doi":"10.1002/eahr.60009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Open science initiatives, intended to democratize access to research products, have made steady progress in shifting the global science culture toward practices like preregistration and data sharing. However, current open science efforts have not yet addressed the special obligation to ensure that research results are made accessible to the portion of the general population who contribute most directly to scientific advances: research participants. In this article, we explore the ethical obligation to communicate aggregate results to research participants and consider elements of open science infrastructure that could be amended for this purpose. We consider open questions for implementation related to the methods, timing, potential harms, oversight, and incentives for communicating aggregate results and pose solutions that could, following the example of open science initiatives, succeed in nudging investigators to reciprocate the efforts of research participants by sharing the scientific findings they helped to advance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"47 4","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eahr.60009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Obligation to Share Aggregate Results with Research Participants in the Era of Open Science\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E. MacDuffie,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Wilfond,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Kraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eahr.60009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Open science initiatives, intended to democratize access to research products, have made steady progress in shifting the global science culture toward practices like preregistration and data sharing. However, current open science efforts have not yet addressed the special obligation to ensure that research results are made accessible to the portion of the general population who contribute most directly to scientific advances: research participants. In this article, we explore the ethical obligation to communicate aggregate results to research participants and consider elements of open science infrastructure that could be amended for this purpose. We consider open questions for implementation related to the methods, timing, potential harms, oversight, and incentives for communicating aggregate results and pose solutions that could, following the example of open science initiatives, succeed in nudging investigators to reciprocate the efforts of research participants by sharing the scientific findings they helped to advance.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics & human research\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"29-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eahr.60009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics & human research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.60009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.60009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放科学计划旨在使研究产品的获取民主化,在将全球科学文化转向预注册和数据共享等实践方面取得了稳步进展。然而,目前的开放科学努力还没有解决特殊的义务,即确保对科学进步做出最直接贡献的普通人群——研究参与者——能够获得研究成果。在本文中,我们探讨了向研究参与者传达总体结果的伦理义务,并考虑了开放科学基础设施的要素,可以为此目的进行修改。我们考虑了与方法、时间、潜在危害、监督和交流总体结果的激励机制相关的开放性问题,并提出了解决方案,这些解决方案可以遵循开放科学倡议的例子,成功地推动研究者通过分享他们帮助推进的科学发现来回报研究参与者的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Revisiting the Obligation to Share Aggregate Results with Research Participants in the Era of Open Science

Revisiting the Obligation to Share Aggregate Results with Research Participants in the Era of Open Science

Open science initiatives, intended to democratize access to research products, have made steady progress in shifting the global science culture toward practices like preregistration and data sharing. However, current open science efforts have not yet addressed the special obligation to ensure that research results are made accessible to the portion of the general population who contribute most directly to scientific advances: research participants. In this article, we explore the ethical obligation to communicate aggregate results to research participants and consider elements of open science infrastructure that could be amended for this purpose. We consider open questions for implementation related to the methods, timing, potential harms, oversight, and incentives for communicating aggregate results and pose solutions that could, following the example of open science initiatives, succeed in nudging investigators to reciprocate the efforts of research participants by sharing the scientific findings they helped to advance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信