聚苯乙烯泡沫固定装置对放疗患者设置错误的单因素和多因素分析

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jun Chen, Yi Guo, Changsheng Wang, Simin Lin, Linglong Shao, Linzhen Lan, Feibao Guo
{"title":"聚苯乙烯泡沫固定装置对放疗患者设置错误的单因素和多因素分析","authors":"Jun Chen,&nbsp;Yi Guo,&nbsp;Changsheng Wang,&nbsp;Simin Lin,&nbsp;Linglong Shao,&nbsp;Linzhen Lan,&nbsp;Feibao Guo","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Styrofoam is a patient-specific immobilization device in radiotherapy; most previous studies about the impact of styrofoam on setup errors have only analyzed a single tumor type, and have not considered the influence of patient's physical condition on the setup errors of styrofoam.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of styrofoam device on setup errors in radiotherapy and explore which patient population is more suitable for styrofoam immobilization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the setup errors between the experimental group (styrofoam combined with thermoplastic mask) and the control group (thermoplastic mask alone). All cases were categorized based on tumor location into head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and limb cases, with age, gender, surgical history, educational level, and body mass index (BMI) serving as variables in the multivariate analysis. Intragroup analysis was also performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For all included cases, the experimental group had median setup errors of 1.20 , 2.00 , and 1.30 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. In contrast, the control group had median setup errors of 1.50 , 2.00 , and 1.85 mm in the same respective directions. Notably, the experimental group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in average setup errors in the longitudinal direction (2.00  vs. 2.87 mm, <i>p </i>&lt; 0.01) and lateral direction (1.90  vs. 2.24 mm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) compared to the control group. The intragroup analysis results indicated that factors such as age, gender, surgical history, and educational level had no significant impact on the setup errors in the experimental group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The styrofoam fixation device for patient immobilization can effectively reduce setup errors in both the longitudinal and lateral directions, and the styrofoam fixation device is suitable for most people.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Univariate and multivariate analysis of the styrofoam fixation device on patient setup errors in radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Jun Chen,&nbsp;Yi Guo,&nbsp;Changsheng Wang,&nbsp;Simin Lin,&nbsp;Linglong Shao,&nbsp;Linzhen Lan,&nbsp;Feibao Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Styrofoam is a patient-specific immobilization device in radiotherapy; most previous studies about the impact of styrofoam on setup errors have only analyzed a single tumor type, and have not considered the influence of patient's physical condition on the setup errors of styrofoam.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of styrofoam device on setup errors in radiotherapy and explore which patient population is more suitable for styrofoam immobilization.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the setup errors between the experimental group (styrofoam combined with thermoplastic mask) and the control group (thermoplastic mask alone). All cases were categorized based on tumor location into head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and limb cases, with age, gender, surgical history, educational level, and body mass index (BMI) serving as variables in the multivariate analysis. Intragroup analysis was also performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>For all included cases, the experimental group had median setup errors of 1.20 , 2.00 , and 1.30 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. In contrast, the control group had median setup errors of 1.50 , 2.00 , and 1.85 mm in the same respective directions. Notably, the experimental group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in average setup errors in the longitudinal direction (2.00  vs. 2.87 mm, <i>p </i>&lt; 0.01) and lateral direction (1.90  vs. 2.24 mm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) compared to the control group. The intragroup analysis results indicated that factors such as age, gender, surgical history, and educational level had no significant impact on the setup errors in the experimental group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The styrofoam fixation device for patient immobilization can effectively reduce setup errors in both the longitudinal and lateral directions, and the styrofoam fixation device is suitable for most people.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70181\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70181\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料是放射治疗中患者特异性固定装置;以往关于聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料对设置误差影响的研究大多只分析了单一肿瘤类型,没有考虑患者身体状况对聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料设置误差的影响。目的评价泡沫聚苯乙烯固定装置对放射治疗中设置错误的影响,探讨哪种患者更适合泡沫聚苯乙烯固定。方法采用单因素和多因素分析,比较实验组(泡沫聚苯乙烯联合热塑性口罩)和对照组(单独热塑性口罩)的设置误差。所有病例根据肿瘤部位分为头颈部、胸部、腹部和四肢,以年龄、性别、手术史、文化程度、身体质量指数(BMI)作为变量进行多因素分析。同时进行组内分析。结果实验组在纵向、纵向和横向上的中位误差分别为1.20、2.00和1.30 mm。相比之下,对照组在相同方向上的中位设置误差分别为1.50、2.00和1.85 mm。值得注意的是,实验组在纵向上的平均设置误差(2.00 vs. 2.87 mm, p <;0.01)和横向(1.90 vs. 2.24 mm, p <;0.01)。组内分析结果显示,实验组年龄、性别、手术史、文化程度等因素对设置误差无显著影响。结论泡沫聚苯乙烯固定装置用于患者固定可有效减少纵向和横向的设置误差,适用于大多数患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the styrofoam fixation device on patient setup errors in radiotherapy

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the styrofoam fixation device on patient setup errors in radiotherapy

Background

Styrofoam is a patient-specific immobilization device in radiotherapy; most previous studies about the impact of styrofoam on setup errors have only analyzed a single tumor type, and have not considered the influence of patient's physical condition on the setup errors of styrofoam.

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the impact of styrofoam device on setup errors in radiotherapy and explore which patient population is more suitable for styrofoam immobilization.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the setup errors between the experimental group (styrofoam combined with thermoplastic mask) and the control group (thermoplastic mask alone). All cases were categorized based on tumor location into head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and limb cases, with age, gender, surgical history, educational level, and body mass index (BMI) serving as variables in the multivariate analysis. Intragroup analysis was also performed.

Results

For all included cases, the experimental group had median setup errors of 1.20 , 2.00 , and 1.30 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. In contrast, the control group had median setup errors of 1.50 , 2.00 , and 1.85 mm in the same respective directions. Notably, the experimental group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in average setup errors in the longitudinal direction (2.00  vs. 2.87 mm, < 0.01) and lateral direction (1.90  vs. 2.24 mm, p < 0.01) compared to the control group. The intragroup analysis results indicated that factors such as age, gender, surgical history, and educational level had no significant impact on the setup errors in the experimental group.

Conclusion

The styrofoam fixation device for patient immobilization can effectively reduce setup errors in both the longitudinal and lateral directions, and the styrofoam fixation device is suitable for most people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信