开源软件项目中软件物料清单的采用

IF 4.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Sabato Nocera , Simone Romano , Massimiliano Di Penta , Rita Francese , Giuseppe Scanniello
{"title":"开源软件项目中软件物料清单的采用","authors":"Sabato Nocera ,&nbsp;Simone Romano ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Di Penta ,&nbsp;Rita Francese ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Scanniello","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A <em>Software Bill of Materials</em> (<em>SBOM</em>) formally lists the open-source and proprietary components that constitute a software product, including their licenses, versions, vendors, vulnerabilities, and supply chain relationships. SBOMs enable software producers and consumers to gain visibility into the software supply chain and monitor the risks associated with software security, licensing, and more. This paper presents the results of an exploratory mining study investigating the adoption of SBOMs by open-source software projects. To that end, we mined <em>GitHub</em> and identified 186 public software repositories using SBOM generation tools owned by <em>SPDX</em> and <em>CycloneDX</em>. Although the adoption of SBOMs is low, it is increasing. Moreover, SBOMs are under version control or available in public release versions of less than half the software projects analyzed. Finally, only a limited fraction of SBOMs contain minimum/recommended information, and some SBOMs are also uncompliant with existing SBOM standards. Our study reveals that software producers are paying more attention to SBOMs, but even so, these may be incomplete. We urge software producers to adopt SBOMs and meet the new software supply chain standards. As for researchers, we foster further investigations on adopting SBOMs and their correct use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 112540"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the adoption of software bill of materials in open-source software projects\",\"authors\":\"Sabato Nocera ,&nbsp;Simone Romano ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Di Penta ,&nbsp;Rita Francese ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Scanniello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A <em>Software Bill of Materials</em> (<em>SBOM</em>) formally lists the open-source and proprietary components that constitute a software product, including their licenses, versions, vendors, vulnerabilities, and supply chain relationships. SBOMs enable software producers and consumers to gain visibility into the software supply chain and monitor the risks associated with software security, licensing, and more. This paper presents the results of an exploratory mining study investigating the adoption of SBOMs by open-source software projects. To that end, we mined <em>GitHub</em> and identified 186 public software repositories using SBOM generation tools owned by <em>SPDX</em> and <em>CycloneDX</em>. Although the adoption of SBOMs is low, it is increasing. Moreover, SBOMs are under version control or available in public release versions of less than half the software projects analyzed. Finally, only a limited fraction of SBOMs contain minimum/recommended information, and some SBOMs are also uncompliant with existing SBOM standards. Our study reveals that software producers are paying more attention to SBOMs, but even so, these may be incomplete. We urge software producers to adopt SBOMs and meet the new software supply chain standards. As for researchers, we foster further investigations on adopting SBOMs and their correct use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225002092\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225002092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件物料清单(Software Bill of Materials, SBOM)正式列出了构成软件产品的开源和专有组件,包括它们的许可证、版本、供应商、漏洞和供应链关系。soms使软件生产者和消费者能够获得软件供应链的可见性,并监视与软件安全性、许可等相关的风险。本文介绍了一项探索性研究的结果,该研究调查了开源软件项目对soms的采用。为此,我们挖掘了GitHub,并使用SPDX和CycloneDX拥有的SBOM生成工具确定了186个公共软件存储库。虽然soms的采用率很低,但它正在增加。此外,soms处于版本控制之下,或者在所分析的软件项目的公开发布版本中可用的不到一半。最后,只有一小部分SBOM包含最少/推荐的信息,而且一些SBOM也不符合现有的SBOM标准。我们的研究表明,软件生产商正在更加关注soms,但即便如此,这些可能是不完整的。我们敦促软件生产商采用soms,并符合新的软件供应链标准。对于研究人员,我们鼓励进一步研究采用soms及其正确使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the adoption of software bill of materials in open-source software projects
A Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) formally lists the open-source and proprietary components that constitute a software product, including their licenses, versions, vendors, vulnerabilities, and supply chain relationships. SBOMs enable software producers and consumers to gain visibility into the software supply chain and monitor the risks associated with software security, licensing, and more. This paper presents the results of an exploratory mining study investigating the adoption of SBOMs by open-source software projects. To that end, we mined GitHub and identified 186 public software repositories using SBOM generation tools owned by SPDX and CycloneDX. Although the adoption of SBOMs is low, it is increasing. Moreover, SBOMs are under version control or available in public release versions of less than half the software projects analyzed. Finally, only a limited fraction of SBOMs contain minimum/recommended information, and some SBOMs are also uncompliant with existing SBOM standards. Our study reveals that software producers are paying more attention to SBOMs, but even so, these may be incomplete. We urge software producers to adopt SBOMs and meet the new software supply chain standards. As for researchers, we foster further investigations on adopting SBOMs and their correct use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信