腹腔镜下安装直肌鞘阻滞对经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛减轻的疗效:一项双盲、随机对照试验。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-07-14 DOI:10.1111/anae.16680
Manuel Altenburg,Timo Rath,Atingwa Tasi,Oliver Mann,Salman Yousuf Guraya,Thorsten Krause,Tim Strate,Jonas Herzberg
{"title":"腹腔镜下安装直肌鞘阻滞对经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛减轻的疗效:一项双盲、随机对照试验。","authors":"Manuel Altenburg,Timo Rath,Atingwa Tasi,Oliver Mann,Salman Yousuf Guraya,Thorsten Krause,Tim Strate,Jonas Herzberg","doi":"10.1111/anae.16680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nPostoperative pain management plays a crucial role in early recovery after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, particularly as most repairs are done as day-case surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic effect of a laparoscopically-guided rectus sheath block on postoperative pain.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWithin this prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients planned for inguinal hernia repair using the transabdominal preperitoneal patch plastic were recruited. Patients were assigned randomly to either a control group or an intervention group. Both received standardised pre-emptive anaesthesia during the surgical procedure with self-fixating mesh. In the intervention group, an intra-operatively implemented rectus sheath block was performed for postoperative pain control. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score 3 h after surgery.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThirty-five patients were included in the study; 17 patients were randomised to the intervention group and 18 to the control group. Patient demographics and procedural times were similar in both groups. Postoperative median (IQR [range]) pain scores were not significantly different between the groups 3 h after surgery (intervention group 3.0 (3.0-5.0 [1.0-8.0]) vs. control group 3.5 (2.25-4.75 [1.0-8.0]); p = 0.854). The median (IQR [range]) oxycodone requirement after surgery was not different between the groups (intervention group 0 (0-3 [0-7]) mg vs. control group 0 (0-3 [0-7]) mg; p = 0.869).\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nThis study has shown that a laparoscopic rectus sheath block has no beneficial effect in postoperative pain management following laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of laparoscopic-installed rectus sheath block for postoperative pain reduction in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind, randomised-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Altenburg,Timo Rath,Atingwa Tasi,Oliver Mann,Salman Yousuf Guraya,Thorsten Krause,Tim Strate,Jonas Herzberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nPostoperative pain management plays a crucial role in early recovery after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, particularly as most repairs are done as day-case surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic effect of a laparoscopically-guided rectus sheath block on postoperative pain.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWithin this prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients planned for inguinal hernia repair using the transabdominal preperitoneal patch plastic were recruited. Patients were assigned randomly to either a control group or an intervention group. Both received standardised pre-emptive anaesthesia during the surgical procedure with self-fixating mesh. In the intervention group, an intra-operatively implemented rectus sheath block was performed for postoperative pain control. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score 3 h after surgery.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThirty-five patients were included in the study; 17 patients were randomised to the intervention group and 18 to the control group. Patient demographics and procedural times were similar in both groups. Postoperative median (IQR [range]) pain scores were not significantly different between the groups 3 h after surgery (intervention group 3.0 (3.0-5.0 [1.0-8.0]) vs. control group 3.5 (2.25-4.75 [1.0-8.0]); p = 0.854). The median (IQR [range]) oxycodone requirement after surgery was not different between the groups (intervention group 0 (0-3 [0-7]) mg vs. control group 0 (0-3 [0-7]) mg; p = 0.869).\\r\\n\\r\\nDISCUSSION\\r\\nThis study has shown that a laparoscopic rectus sheath block has no beneficial effect in postoperative pain management following laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16680\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后疼痛管理在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的早期恢复中起着至关重要的作用,特别是因为大多数修补都是日常手术。本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜引导下直肌鞘阻滞对术后疼痛的麻醉效果。方法在这项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验中,招募了计划使用经腹腹膜前贴片塑料修复腹股沟疝的患者。患者被随机分为对照组和干预组。在手术过程中,两例患者均使用自固定补片进行标准化的先发制人麻醉。在干预组中,术中实施直肌鞘阻滞以控制术后疼痛。主要观察指标为术后3小时疼痛评分。结果35例患者纳入研究;17例患者随机分为干预组,18例患者分为对照组。两组患者的人口学特征和手术时间相似。术后3 h,干预组3.0(3.0-5.0[1.0-8.0])与对照组3.5(2.25-4.75[1.0-8.0])疼痛评分中位数(IQR[范围])组间差异无统计学意义;p = 0.854)。术后氧可酮需要量中位数(IQR[范围])组间差异无统计学意义(干预组0 (0-3 [0-7])mg与对照组0 (0-3 [0-7])mg;p = 0.869)。本研究表明,腹腔镜下腹直肌鞘阻滞对腹腔镜经腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛管理无有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of laparoscopic-installed rectus sheath block for postoperative pain reduction in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind, randomised-controlled trial.
INTRODUCTION Postoperative pain management plays a crucial role in early recovery after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, particularly as most repairs are done as day-case surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic effect of a laparoscopically-guided rectus sheath block on postoperative pain. METHODS Within this prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients planned for inguinal hernia repair using the transabdominal preperitoneal patch plastic were recruited. Patients were assigned randomly to either a control group or an intervention group. Both received standardised pre-emptive anaesthesia during the surgical procedure with self-fixating mesh. In the intervention group, an intra-operatively implemented rectus sheath block was performed for postoperative pain control. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score 3 h after surgery. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were included in the study; 17 patients were randomised to the intervention group and 18 to the control group. Patient demographics and procedural times were similar in both groups. Postoperative median (IQR [range]) pain scores were not significantly different between the groups 3 h after surgery (intervention group 3.0 (3.0-5.0 [1.0-8.0]) vs. control group 3.5 (2.25-4.75 [1.0-8.0]); p = 0.854). The median (IQR [range]) oxycodone requirement after surgery was not different between the groups (intervention group 0 (0-3 [0-7]) mg vs. control group 0 (0-3 [0-7]) mg; p = 0.869). DISCUSSION This study has shown that a laparoscopic rectus sheath block has no beneficial effect in postoperative pain management following laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信