异步远程医疗流产药物服务与患者的沟通。

Anna Fiastro, Nikeeta Shah, Rebecca Gomperts, Jessica Gipson, Emily Godfrey
{"title":"异步远程医疗流产药物服务与患者的沟通。","authors":"Anna Fiastro, Nikeeta Shah, Rebecca Gomperts, Jessica Gipson, Emily Godfrey","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding patient communication with clinic providers or staff in telemedicine abortion can inform appropriate staffing.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We describe patient-service communication when using asynchronous telemedicine abortion services from April-November 2020 (n=504) and compare patient demographics with number of messages using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of patients communicated with staff (56%, n= 287), median 6 messages per patient (Interquartile range: 3-10 messages). Primary topics included 1) eligibility, 2) payment, 3) medication delivery, and 4) physical process. Message volume did not differ by patient demographics.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Our findings inform communication and staffing quantity and quality in telemedicine abortion provision.</p><p><strong>Implications statement: </strong>Asynchronous telehealth abortion patients require minimal communication, and most inquiries can be addressed by non-clinical staff. These insights can inform resource allocation and staffing decisions in telehealth abortion services, improving efficiency while maintaining patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"111014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication with Patients Using Asynchronous Telehealth Medication Abortion Services.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Fiastro, Nikeeta Shah, Rebecca Gomperts, Jessica Gipson, Emily Godfrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding patient communication with clinic providers or staff in telemedicine abortion can inform appropriate staffing.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We describe patient-service communication when using asynchronous telemedicine abortion services from April-November 2020 (n=504) and compare patient demographics with number of messages using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of patients communicated with staff (56%, n= 287), median 6 messages per patient (Interquartile range: 3-10 messages). Primary topics included 1) eligibility, 2) payment, 3) medication delivery, and 4) physical process. Message volume did not differ by patient demographics.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Our findings inform communication and staffing quantity and quality in telemedicine abortion provision.</p><p><strong>Implications statement: </strong>Asynchronous telehealth abortion patients require minimal communication, and most inquiries can be addressed by non-clinical staff. These insights can inform resource allocation and staffing decisions in telehealth abortion services, improving efficiency while maintaining patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"111014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:了解远程医疗流产患者与诊所提供者或工作人员的沟通可以为适当的人员配置提供信息。方法:我们描述了2020年4月至11月使用异步远程医疗流产服务时的患者服务沟通情况(n=504),并使用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验比较了患者人口统计数据与消息数量。结果:约有一半的患者与医护人员沟通(56%,n= 287),平均每位患者6条信息(四分位数间距:3-10条信息)。主要主题包括1)资格,2)付款,3)药物递送,以及4)物理过程。信息量没有因患者人口统计而异。意义:我们的研究结果为远程医疗流产提供的沟通和人员数量和质量提供了信息。含义声明:异步远程医疗流产患者需要最少的沟通,大多数询问可以由非临床工作人员解决。这些见解可以为远程医疗堕胎服务的资源分配和人员配置决策提供信息,在保持患者满意度的同时提高效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication with Patients Using Asynchronous Telehealth Medication Abortion Services.

Introduction: Understanding patient communication with clinic providers or staff in telemedicine abortion can inform appropriate staffing.

Methodology: We describe patient-service communication when using asynchronous telemedicine abortion services from April-November 2020 (n=504) and compare patient demographics with number of messages using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test.

Results: About half of patients communicated with staff (56%, n= 287), median 6 messages per patient (Interquartile range: 3-10 messages). Primary topics included 1) eligibility, 2) payment, 3) medication delivery, and 4) physical process. Message volume did not differ by patient demographics.

Implications: Our findings inform communication and staffing quantity and quality in telemedicine abortion provision.

Implications statement: Asynchronous telehealth abortion patients require minimal communication, and most inquiries can be addressed by non-clinical staff. These insights can inform resource allocation and staffing decisions in telehealth abortion services, improving efficiency while maintaining patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信