活动受限的成年人对骨密度的影响:来自一项全国性调查的结果。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Joy Haizelden, Linda Knol, Lori Turner
{"title":"活动受限的成年人对骨密度的影响:来自一项全国性调查的结果。","authors":"Joy Haizelden, Linda Knol, Lori Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for low bone mineral density (BMD) are widely recognized in the general population; however, influences on BMD in people with mobility limitations is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine factors that influence BMD in US adults with mobility limitations, including demographic, anthropometric, and physical activity measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2013-2018 data, including 421 adults aged ≥20 years with self-reported walking difficulties. Risk factors for low bone mineral density were used including physical activity. Physical activity was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and recoded as meeting or not meeting the guidelines. Total BMD was measured with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. Multiple linear regression was used to assess for differences in total BMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BMD was significantly higher for males versus females (p < .001), Non-Hispanic blacks versus Non-Hispanic whites (p = .004), individuals who were overweight or obese compared to a people with healthy weights (p = .02, p < .001, respectively). As age increased, BMD decreased. No significant difference in BMD was found between participants meeting physical activity guidelines (1.084 ± 0.012 g/cm<sup>2</sup>) and those who did not meet guidelines (1.076 ± 0.011 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; p = .99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adults with mobility limitations, traditional demographic and anthropometric risk factors significantly influenced BMD. Calcium intake, vitamin D intake and physical activity guideline adherence were not significant. These findings suggest the need for targeted research to more fully understand bone health determinants in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101923"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences on bone mineral density among adults with mobility Limitations: Results from a national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Joy Haizelden, Linda Knol, Lori Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for low bone mineral density (BMD) are widely recognized in the general population; however, influences on BMD in people with mobility limitations is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine factors that influence BMD in US adults with mobility limitations, including demographic, anthropometric, and physical activity measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2013-2018 data, including 421 adults aged ≥20 years with self-reported walking difficulties. Risk factors for low bone mineral density were used including physical activity. Physical activity was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and recoded as meeting or not meeting the guidelines. Total BMD was measured with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. Multiple linear regression was used to assess for differences in total BMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BMD was significantly higher for males versus females (p < .001), Non-Hispanic blacks versus Non-Hispanic whites (p = .004), individuals who were overweight or obese compared to a people with healthy weights (p = .02, p < .001, respectively). As age increased, BMD decreased. No significant difference in BMD was found between participants meeting physical activity guidelines (1.084 ± 0.012 g/cm<sup>2</sup>) and those who did not meet guidelines (1.076 ± 0.011 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; p = .99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adults with mobility limitations, traditional demographic and anthropometric risk factors significantly influenced BMD. Calcium intake, vitamin D intake and physical activity guideline adherence were not significant. These findings suggest the need for targeted research to more fully understand bone health determinants in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101923\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低骨密度(BMD)的危险因素在普通人群中被广泛认识;然而,活动受限人群对骨密度的影响尚不清楚。目的:研究影响美国行动受限成人骨密度的因素,包括人口统计学、人体测量学和身体活动测量。方法:对NHANES 2013-2018年数据进行横断面分析,包括421名年龄≥20岁、自述行走困难的成年人。低骨密度的危险因素包括体力活动。使用全球身体活动问卷对身体活动进行评估,并将其记录为符合或不符合指南。用双能x线吸收仪扫描测量总骨密度。采用多元线性回归评估总骨密度的差异。结果:男性的骨密度明显高于女性(p < 2),不符合指南者(1.076±0.011 g/cm2;p = .99)。结论:在活动受限的成年人中,传统的人口统计学和人体测量学危险因素显著影响骨密度。钙摄入量、维生素D摄入量和体力活动指南依从性无显著性差异。这些发现表明,需要进行有针对性的研究,以更充分地了解这一人群的骨骼健康决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influences on bone mineral density among adults with mobility Limitations: Results from a national survey.

Background: Risk factors for low bone mineral density (BMD) are widely recognized in the general population; however, influences on BMD in people with mobility limitations is not well understood.

Objective: To examine factors that influence BMD in US adults with mobility limitations, including demographic, anthropometric, and physical activity measures.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2013-2018 data, including 421 adults aged ≥20 years with self-reported walking difficulties. Risk factors for low bone mineral density were used including physical activity. Physical activity was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and recoded as meeting or not meeting the guidelines. Total BMD was measured with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. Multiple linear regression was used to assess for differences in total BMD.

Results: BMD was significantly higher for males versus females (p < .001), Non-Hispanic blacks versus Non-Hispanic whites (p = .004), individuals who were overweight or obese compared to a people with healthy weights (p = .02, p < .001, respectively). As age increased, BMD decreased. No significant difference in BMD was found between participants meeting physical activity guidelines (1.084 ± 0.012 g/cm2) and those who did not meet guidelines (1.076 ± 0.011 g/cm2; p = .99).

Conclusion: In adults with mobility limitations, traditional demographic and anthropometric risk factors significantly influenced BMD. Calcium intake, vitamin D intake and physical activity guideline adherence were not significant. These findings suggest the need for targeted research to more fully understand bone health determinants in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信