分析不同残疾成人的横截面样本中残疾主义者微侵犯与幸福感之间的关系。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Whitney M Morean, Abigail Hayden, Angela Maccarrone, Jacob A Bentley
{"title":"分析不同残疾成人的横截面样本中残疾主义者微侵犯与幸福感之间的关系。","authors":"Whitney M Morean, Abigail Hayden, Angela Maccarrone, Jacob A Bentley","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In prior research ableist microaggressions have correlated with higher measures of psychological distress. However, research has not yet examined the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being as measured not merely by the absence of distressing mental health symptoms, but rather about effective functioning and flourishing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study addressed this gap by analyzing the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being and assessing if different coping strategies moderate the relationship in a sample of adults with varied disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with (n = 132) adults who self-identified as having a health condition that significantly impacts one or more major life activities. Participants were recruited online to complete a Qualtrics survey of measures of well-being, ableist microaggressions, coping, and depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ableist microaggression scores did not significantly predict well-being. Depression scores and disability visibility predicted well-being. In planned exploratory post-hoc analyses, those who endorsed having a more visible disabilities reported experiencing statistically significant more ableist microaggressions and statistically significant higher well-being scores than those endorsing less visible disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with prior literature, depression scores predicted lower well-being. Participants with more visible disabilities reported experiencing more ableist microaggressions and also endorsed higher well-being. This research supports that depression and well-being are independent constructs. Further research needs to examine factors such as, positive disability identity, connection to the disability community, and disability pride, that might contribute to why those with more visible disabilities experience more ableist microaggression while also endorsing higher levels of well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being in a cross-sectional sample of adults with varied disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Whitney M Morean, Abigail Hayden, Angela Maccarrone, Jacob A Bentley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In prior research ableist microaggressions have correlated with higher measures of psychological distress. However, research has not yet examined the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being as measured not merely by the absence of distressing mental health symptoms, but rather about effective functioning and flourishing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study addressed this gap by analyzing the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being and assessing if different coping strategies moderate the relationship in a sample of adults with varied disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with (n = 132) adults who self-identified as having a health condition that significantly impacts one or more major life activities. Participants were recruited online to complete a Qualtrics survey of measures of well-being, ableist microaggressions, coping, and depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ableist microaggression scores did not significantly predict well-being. Depression scores and disability visibility predicted well-being. In planned exploratory post-hoc analyses, those who endorsed having a more visible disabilities reported experiencing statistically significant more ableist microaggressions and statistically significant higher well-being scores than those endorsing less visible disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with prior literature, depression scores predicted lower well-being. Participants with more visible disabilities reported experiencing more ableist microaggressions and also endorsed higher well-being. This research supports that depression and well-being are independent constructs. Further research needs to examine factors such as, positive disability identity, connection to the disability community, and disability pride, that might contribute to why those with more visible disabilities experience more ableist microaggression while also endorsing higher levels of well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101925\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在先前的研究中,残疾微侵犯与较高的心理困扰水平相关。然而,研究还没有检验能力主义者的微侵犯行为和幸福感之间的关系,这种关系不仅是通过缺乏痛苦的心理健康症状来衡量的,而是通过有效的功能和繁荣来衡量的。目的:本研究通过分析残疾微攻击与幸福感之间的关系,并评估不同的应对策略是否会调节这种关系,从而弥补这一空白。方法:对(n = 132)名自认为有严重影响一项或多项主要生活活动的健康状况的成年人进行横断面调查。研究人员在网上招募了参与者,让他们完成一项关于幸福感、能动性微侵犯、应对和抑郁症状的质量调查。结果:Ableist微攻击得分不能显著预测幸福感。抑郁得分和残疾可见度预测了幸福感。在计划的探索性事后分析中,那些认可有更明显残疾的人报告说,与那些认可不太明显残疾的人相比,他们经历了统计上显著更多的残疾主义微侵犯,统计上显著更高的幸福感得分。结论:与先前的文献一致,抑郁得分预示着较低的幸福感。有更多明显残疾的参与者报告说,他们经历了更多的残疾主义微侵犯,也认可了更高的幸福感。本研究支持抑郁和幸福感是相互独立的概念。进一步的研究需要检查诸如积极的残疾认同、与残疾社区的联系以及残疾自豪感等因素,这些因素可能有助于解释为什么那些明显残疾的人经历了更多的残疾主义微攻击,同时也认可了更高水平的幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being in a cross-sectional sample of adults with varied disabilities.

Background: In prior research ableist microaggressions have correlated with higher measures of psychological distress. However, research has not yet examined the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being as measured not merely by the absence of distressing mental health symptoms, but rather about effective functioning and flourishing.

Objective: The present study addressed this gap by analyzing the relationship between ableist microaggressions and well-being and assessing if different coping strategies moderate the relationship in a sample of adults with varied disabilities.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with (n = 132) adults who self-identified as having a health condition that significantly impacts one or more major life activities. Participants were recruited online to complete a Qualtrics survey of measures of well-being, ableist microaggressions, coping, and depression symptoms.

Results: Ableist microaggression scores did not significantly predict well-being. Depression scores and disability visibility predicted well-being. In planned exploratory post-hoc analyses, those who endorsed having a more visible disabilities reported experiencing statistically significant more ableist microaggressions and statistically significant higher well-being scores than those endorsing less visible disabilities.

Conclusions: Consistent with prior literature, depression scores predicted lower well-being. Participants with more visible disabilities reported experiencing more ableist microaggressions and also endorsed higher well-being. This research supports that depression and well-being are independent constructs. Further research needs to examine factors such as, positive disability identity, connection to the disability community, and disability pride, that might contribute to why those with more visible disabilities experience more ableist microaggression while also endorsing higher levels of well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信