Hend Mahmoud Hegazi, Amr Elkhadem, Ahmed Fayyad, Doaa Mahmoud Elkady, Maha Wagdy Elkerdawy, Arwa Sedky
{"title":"间接CAD-CAM可摘局部义齿框架以患者为中心的疗效:一项2年随访研究。","authors":"Hend Mahmoud Hegazi, Amr Elkhadem, Ahmed Fayyad, Doaa Mahmoud Elkady, Maha Wagdy Elkerdawy, Arwa Sedky","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess patient-centered outcomes of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and cobalt chromium (CoCr) removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks, as well as to present detailed technical steps of digital designing and indirect production of metal and PEEK RPD frameworks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial included 30 patients. The enrolled patients were partially edentulous with mandibular Kennedy Class I. They were randomly assigned to receive an indirect computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) PEEK RPD as the interventional group, or an indirect CAD-CAM metallic (CoCr) RPD as the control group. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and patient satisfaction were evaluated by the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14) and patient satisfaction with the Lower Removable Denture Questionnaire (SLRD-Q), respectively. They were assessed at RPD insertion as a baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 1 year (T3), and 2 years (T4) after insertion. Mann-Whitney and Friedman's tests were used for statistical analysis (p-value = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed the follow-up period. No significant difference was found at all follow-up periods between both RPDs regarding both OHRQoL and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this short-term study, it can be concluded that indirect CAD-CAM PEEK and metallic RPDs are acceptable treatment options for Kennedy Class I edentulous mandibles, from the patient's perspective. Both RPDs improved OHRQoL to a degree that surpasses the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) after 2 years. Patient satisfaction improved as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-centered outcomes of indirect CAD-CAM removable partial denture frameworks: A 2-year follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Hend Mahmoud Hegazi, Amr Elkhadem, Ahmed Fayyad, Doaa Mahmoud Elkady, Maha Wagdy Elkerdawy, Arwa Sedky\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.14100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess patient-centered outcomes of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and cobalt chromium (CoCr) removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks, as well as to present detailed technical steps of digital designing and indirect production of metal and PEEK RPD frameworks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial included 30 patients. The enrolled patients were partially edentulous with mandibular Kennedy Class I. They were randomly assigned to receive an indirect computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) PEEK RPD as the interventional group, or an indirect CAD-CAM metallic (CoCr) RPD as the control group. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and patient satisfaction were evaluated by the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14) and patient satisfaction with the Lower Removable Denture Questionnaire (SLRD-Q), respectively. They were assessed at RPD insertion as a baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 1 year (T3), and 2 years (T4) after insertion. Mann-Whitney and Friedman's tests were used for statistical analysis (p-value = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed the follow-up period. No significant difference was found at all follow-up periods between both RPDs regarding both OHRQoL and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this short-term study, it can be concluded that indirect CAD-CAM PEEK and metallic RPDs are acceptable treatment options for Kennedy Class I edentulous mandibles, from the patient's perspective. Both RPDs improved OHRQoL to a degree that surpasses the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) after 2 years. Patient satisfaction improved as well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14100\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-centered outcomes of indirect CAD-CAM removable partial denture frameworks: A 2-year follow-up study.
Purpose: This study aimed to assess patient-centered outcomes of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and cobalt chromium (CoCr) removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks, as well as to present detailed technical steps of digital designing and indirect production of metal and PEEK RPD frameworks.
Materials and methods: This randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial included 30 patients. The enrolled patients were partially edentulous with mandibular Kennedy Class I. They were randomly assigned to receive an indirect computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) PEEK RPD as the interventional group, or an indirect CAD-CAM metallic (CoCr) RPD as the control group. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and patient satisfaction were evaluated by the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14) and patient satisfaction with the Lower Removable Denture Questionnaire (SLRD-Q), respectively. They were assessed at RPD insertion as a baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 1 year (T3), and 2 years (T4) after insertion. Mann-Whitney and Friedman's tests were used for statistical analysis (p-value = 0.05).
Results: All patients completed the follow-up period. No significant difference was found at all follow-up periods between both RPDs regarding both OHRQoL and patient satisfaction.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this short-term study, it can be concluded that indirect CAD-CAM PEEK and metallic RPDs are acceptable treatment options for Kennedy Class I edentulous mandibles, from the patient's perspective. Both RPDs improved OHRQoL to a degree that surpasses the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) after 2 years. Patient satisfaction improved as well.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.