Susan P. Felter , Ashley M. Mudd , David J. Ponting , Rob Thomas , Alisa Vespa , Timothy J. McGovern , Andreas Zeller , Roland Froetschl , Bodo Haas , Yi Yang , Anthony Lynch , Angela White , Matthew Schmitz , Raechel Puglisi , Joel P. Bercu
{"title":"评估作为亚硝胺致癌性基础的终生累积剂量——建立可接受摄入量限制的非终生方法的关键原则。","authors":"Susan P. Felter , Ashley M. Mudd , David J. Ponting , Rob Thomas , Alisa Vespa , Timothy J. McGovern , Andreas Zeller , Roland Froetschl , Bodo Haas , Yi Yang , Anthony Lynch , Angela White , Matthew Schmitz , Raechel Puglisi , Joel P. Bercu","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Potential health risks associated with <em>N</em>-nitrosamine (NAs) impurities in pharmaceuticals have received significant attention. Regulatory guidance recommends methods to establish Acceptable Intake limits (AIs) that are protective for daily lifetime exposure. However, questions remain whether the same limit should apply to NA impurities in drug products used for less than lifetime (LTL). The ICH M7(R2) guidance addresses this for mutagenic impurities by establishing higher AIs for LTL exposures; however, this has not been adopted in current regulatory guidance for NA impurities which fall under the Cohort of Concern (potentially high potency carcinogens). The research described herein addresses one key knowledge gap: that carcinogenic potency of NAs is a function of total exposure rather than dose rate, a fundamental principle underlying the ICH M7(R2) approach for LTL. Data were evaluated from rodent carcinogenicity bioassays for eight NAs and aflatoxin B1 (another high potency carcinogen) involving exposure durations from 21 to 120 weeks. For all case studies, carcinogenic potency was found to be a function of total cumulative dose rather than daily dose, aligning with the ICH M7(R2) guidance, which posits that higher AI limits can be justified for LTL durations. Remaining knowledge gaps will be addressed in a subsequent publication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the lifetime cumulative dose as a basis for carcinogenic potency of nitrosamines – a key tenet underpinning less-than-lifetime approaches for establishing acceptable intake limits\",\"authors\":\"Susan P. Felter , Ashley M. Mudd , David J. Ponting , Rob Thomas , Alisa Vespa , Timothy J. McGovern , Andreas Zeller , Roland Froetschl , Bodo Haas , Yi Yang , Anthony Lynch , Angela White , Matthew Schmitz , Raechel Puglisi , Joel P. Bercu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Potential health risks associated with <em>N</em>-nitrosamine (NAs) impurities in pharmaceuticals have received significant attention. Regulatory guidance recommends methods to establish Acceptable Intake limits (AIs) that are protective for daily lifetime exposure. However, questions remain whether the same limit should apply to NA impurities in drug products used for less than lifetime (LTL). The ICH M7(R2) guidance addresses this for mutagenic impurities by establishing higher AIs for LTL exposures; however, this has not been adopted in current regulatory guidance for NA impurities which fall under the Cohort of Concern (potentially high potency carcinogens). The research described herein addresses one key knowledge gap: that carcinogenic potency of NAs is a function of total exposure rather than dose rate, a fundamental principle underlying the ICH M7(R2) approach for LTL. Data were evaluated from rodent carcinogenicity bioassays for eight NAs and aflatoxin B1 (another high potency carcinogen) involving exposure durations from 21 to 120 weeks. For all case studies, carcinogenic potency was found to be a function of total cumulative dose rather than daily dose, aligning with the ICH M7(R2) guidance, which posits that higher AI limits can be justified for LTL durations. Remaining knowledge gaps will be addressed in a subsequent publication.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the lifetime cumulative dose as a basis for carcinogenic potency of nitrosamines – a key tenet underpinning less-than-lifetime approaches for establishing acceptable intake limits
Potential health risks associated with N-nitrosamine (NAs) impurities in pharmaceuticals have received significant attention. Regulatory guidance recommends methods to establish Acceptable Intake limits (AIs) that are protective for daily lifetime exposure. However, questions remain whether the same limit should apply to NA impurities in drug products used for less than lifetime (LTL). The ICH M7(R2) guidance addresses this for mutagenic impurities by establishing higher AIs for LTL exposures; however, this has not been adopted in current regulatory guidance for NA impurities which fall under the Cohort of Concern (potentially high potency carcinogens). The research described herein addresses one key knowledge gap: that carcinogenic potency of NAs is a function of total exposure rather than dose rate, a fundamental principle underlying the ICH M7(R2) approach for LTL. Data were evaluated from rodent carcinogenicity bioassays for eight NAs and aflatoxin B1 (another high potency carcinogen) involving exposure durations from 21 to 120 weeks. For all case studies, carcinogenic potency was found to be a function of total cumulative dose rather than daily dose, aligning with the ICH M7(R2) guidance, which posits that higher AI limits can be justified for LTL durations. Remaining knowledge gaps will be addressed in a subsequent publication.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)