全髋关节置换术中股骨骨折骨水泥与无骨水泥固定的生物力学比较。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ryunosuke Watanabe, Tomofumi Nishino, Tomohiro Yoshizawa, Fumi Hirose, Shota Yasunaga, Koshiro Shimasaki, Hajime Mishima
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中股骨骨折骨水泥与无骨水泥固定的生物力学比较。","authors":"Ryunosuke Watanabe, Tomofumi Nishino, Tomohiro Yoshizawa, Fumi Hirose, Shota Yasunaga, Koshiro Shimasaki, Hajime Mishima","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05987-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFF) are serious complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA) that occur more frequently with cementless stems than with cemented stems. Although cerclage wiring is commonly used to stabilize IPFFs, the biomechanical effects of subsequent stem fixation methods remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of cemented and cementless stems following cerclage wire fixation in an experimental IPFF model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six fourth-generation composite femurs with simulated Vancouver A2-type fractures were stabilized using a single 1.8 mm cerclage wire. Identical stem designs of polished cemented stems and fully hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stems were implanted in three specimens of each group. After applying a vertical axial load of 2000 N, an additional 40° of internal rotation was imposed. The primary outcome was the maximum torque at the time of fracture. Secondary outcomes included the maximum internal rotation angle, construct stiffness (calculated from force-displacement curves above 1500 N), and peak strain at three positions on the cerclage wire, measured using strain gauges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum torque was significantly higher in the cemented group compared to the cementless group (160.8 ± 24.9 vs. 89.1 ± 18.0 N·m, p = 0.016). Although the differences in stiffness and internal rotation angle were not statistically significant, both trended higher in the cemented group. The peak strain was consistently lower in the cemented group, with a significant difference at the medial side of the fracture line (p = 0.011, Cohen's d = - 3.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cemented stems demonstrated superior biomechanical stability following cerclage wire fixation in the IPFF model, likely because of improved stress distribution via the cement mantle. Therefore, cemented fixation may be a favorable option for managing IPFF during THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus cementless fixation in intraoperative femoral fractures during total hip arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Ryunosuke Watanabe, Tomofumi Nishino, Tomohiro Yoshizawa, Fumi Hirose, Shota Yasunaga, Koshiro Shimasaki, Hajime Mishima\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05987-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFF) are serious complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA) that occur more frequently with cementless stems than with cemented stems. Although cerclage wiring is commonly used to stabilize IPFFs, the biomechanical effects of subsequent stem fixation methods remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of cemented and cementless stems following cerclage wire fixation in an experimental IPFF model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six fourth-generation composite femurs with simulated Vancouver A2-type fractures were stabilized using a single 1.8 mm cerclage wire. Identical stem designs of polished cemented stems and fully hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stems were implanted in three specimens of each group. After applying a vertical axial load of 2000 N, an additional 40° of internal rotation was imposed. The primary outcome was the maximum torque at the time of fracture. Secondary outcomes included the maximum internal rotation angle, construct stiffness (calculated from force-displacement curves above 1500 N), and peak strain at three positions on the cerclage wire, measured using strain gauges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum torque was significantly higher in the cemented group compared to the cementless group (160.8 ± 24.9 vs. 89.1 ± 18.0 N·m, p = 0.016). Although the differences in stiffness and internal rotation angle were not statistically significant, both trended higher in the cemented group. The peak strain was consistently lower in the cemented group, with a significant difference at the medial side of the fracture line (p = 0.011, Cohen's d = - 3.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cemented stems demonstrated superior biomechanical stability following cerclage wire fixation in the IPFF model, likely because of improved stress distribution via the cement mantle. Therefore, cemented fixation may be a favorable option for managing IPFF during THA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05987-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05987-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术中股骨假体周围骨折(IPFF)是全髋关节置换术(THA)的严重并发症,无骨水泥假体比骨水泥假体更容易发生。虽然环扎钢丝通常用于稳定ipff,但后续的茎固定方法的生物力学效果尚不清楚。本研究的目的是在实验IPFF模型中比较环扎丝固定后骨水泥和非骨水泥骨干的生物力学稳定性。材料和方法:使用一根1.8 mm环扎丝固定6根模拟温哥华a2型骨折的第四代复合股骨。将相同设计的抛光骨水泥茎和完全羟基磷灰石涂层的无骨水泥茎植入每组3个标本。在施加2000 N的垂直轴向载荷后,施加额外的40°内部旋转。主要观察指标是骨折时的最大扭矩。次要结果包括最大内部旋转角度,结构刚度(从1500 N以上的力-位移曲线计算),以及使用应变片测量的环丝上三个位置的峰值应变。结果:骨水泥组的最大扭矩明显高于无骨水泥组(160.8±24.9 vs 89.1±18.0 N·m, p = 0.016)。虽然刚度和内旋角度的差异无统计学意义,但在骨水泥组两者均有升高的趋势。骨水泥组的峰值应变持续较低,在骨折线内侧有显著差异(p = 0.011, Cohen’s d = - 3.64)。结论:在IPFF模型中,骨水泥支架在环扎丝固定后表现出优异的生物力学稳定性,这可能是因为通过骨水泥套改善了应力分布。因此,骨水泥固定可能是THA期间治疗IPFF的一个有利选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus cementless fixation in intraoperative femoral fractures during total hip arthroplasty.

Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus cementless fixation in intraoperative femoral fractures during total hip arthroplasty.

Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus cementless fixation in intraoperative femoral fractures during total hip arthroplasty.

Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus cementless fixation in intraoperative femoral fractures during total hip arthroplasty.

Introduction: Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFF) are serious complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA) that occur more frequently with cementless stems than with cemented stems. Although cerclage wiring is commonly used to stabilize IPFFs, the biomechanical effects of subsequent stem fixation methods remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of cemented and cementless stems following cerclage wire fixation in an experimental IPFF model.

Materials and methods: Six fourth-generation composite femurs with simulated Vancouver A2-type fractures were stabilized using a single 1.8 mm cerclage wire. Identical stem designs of polished cemented stems and fully hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stems were implanted in three specimens of each group. After applying a vertical axial load of 2000 N, an additional 40° of internal rotation was imposed. The primary outcome was the maximum torque at the time of fracture. Secondary outcomes included the maximum internal rotation angle, construct stiffness (calculated from force-displacement curves above 1500 N), and peak strain at three positions on the cerclage wire, measured using strain gauges.

Results: The maximum torque was significantly higher in the cemented group compared to the cementless group (160.8 ± 24.9 vs. 89.1 ± 18.0 N·m, p = 0.016). Although the differences in stiffness and internal rotation angle were not statistically significant, both trended higher in the cemented group. The peak strain was consistently lower in the cemented group, with a significant difference at the medial side of the fracture line (p = 0.011, Cohen's d = - 3.64).

Conclusions: Cemented stems demonstrated superior biomechanical stability following cerclage wire fixation in the IPFF model, likely because of improved stress distribution via the cement mantle. Therefore, cemented fixation may be a favorable option for managing IPFF during THA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信