约旦商标法规定的假冒或模仿商标罪

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Ma'en Juwaihan, Hamzeh Abu Issa, Mohammad Nasr Khater
{"title":"约旦商标法规定的假冒或模仿商标罪","authors":"Ma'en Juwaihan,&nbsp;Hamzeh Abu Issa,&nbsp;Mohammad Nasr Khater","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper critically analyzes the crime of counterfeiting or imitating trademarks under Article 37/1/a of the Jordanian Trademarks Law No. 33 of 1952 and its amendments. Recognizing a significant gap in the alignment of Jordanian trademark laws with international standards, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of current legislation in protecting trademark owners' rights and consumer interests. The importance of this research lies in the escalating instances of trademark infringement, which undermine consumer trust, hinder economic growth, and affect Jordan's compliance with international treaties. Employing descriptive, analytical, and comparative methodologies, the paper examines the material, moral, and subjective elements of the crime, explores jurisprudential and judicial debates on criminal intent, and compares Jordanian legal provisions with those of other jurisdictions. The study shows that, while Jordanian law prohibits the counterfeit of marks, it does not specifically protect well-known marks, and it is inconsistent in the presumption of intention to commit a crime. Moreover, the sentence for attempted trademark infringement does not align with the general principles of Jordanian criminal law. The study recommends that the Jordanian system should consider legislative improvements to ensure stronger protection for trademarks in Jordan. It will also advise to amend Article 37 to set provision for well-known trademarks and more delimitative provisions on criminal intent to conform to the dowry of presumption of innocence, enhance deterrent in penalties, and to be in line with penalty slow down to the international law practice. This paper seeks to address these gaps, contribute to the debate about the purpose of intellectual property rights, and provide suggestions for policymakers who are looking towards enhancing legislative protection from trademark infringement to promote increased economic stability and consumer safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"28 2","pages":"589-611"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The crime of counterfeiting or imitating a trademark under Jordanian trademarks law\",\"authors\":\"Ma'en Juwaihan,&nbsp;Hamzeh Abu Issa,&nbsp;Mohammad Nasr Khater\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jwip.12346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper critically analyzes the crime of counterfeiting or imitating trademarks under Article 37/1/a of the Jordanian Trademarks Law No. 33 of 1952 and its amendments. Recognizing a significant gap in the alignment of Jordanian trademark laws with international standards, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of current legislation in protecting trademark owners' rights and consumer interests. The importance of this research lies in the escalating instances of trademark infringement, which undermine consumer trust, hinder economic growth, and affect Jordan's compliance with international treaties. Employing descriptive, analytical, and comparative methodologies, the paper examines the material, moral, and subjective elements of the crime, explores jurisprudential and judicial debates on criminal intent, and compares Jordanian legal provisions with those of other jurisdictions. The study shows that, while Jordanian law prohibits the counterfeit of marks, it does not specifically protect well-known marks, and it is inconsistent in the presumption of intention to commit a crime. Moreover, the sentence for attempted trademark infringement does not align with the general principles of Jordanian criminal law. The study recommends that the Jordanian system should consider legislative improvements to ensure stronger protection for trademarks in Jordan. It will also advise to amend Article 37 to set provision for well-known trademarks and more delimitative provisions on criminal intent to conform to the dowry of presumption of innocence, enhance deterrent in penalties, and to be in line with penalty slow down to the international law practice. This paper seeks to address these gaps, contribute to the debate about the purpose of intellectual property rights, and provide suggestions for policymakers who are looking towards enhancing legislative protection from trademark infringement to promote increased economic stability and consumer safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"589-611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文根据1952年第33号《约旦商标法》及其修正案第37/1/a条对假冒或模仿商标罪进行了批判性分析。认识到约旦商标法与国际标准的一致性存在重大差距,本研究旨在评估当前立法在保护商标所有者权利和消费者利益方面的有效性。这项研究的重要性在于不断升级的商标侵权事件,这破坏了消费者的信任,阻碍了经济增长,并影响了约旦对国际条约的遵守。本文采用描述性、分析性和比较性的方法,考察了犯罪的物质、道德和主观因素,探讨了关于犯罪意图的法学和司法辩论,并将约旦的法律规定与其他司法管辖区的法律规定进行了比较。研究表明,虽然约旦法律禁止假冒商标,但它并没有特别保护驰名商标,而且在犯罪意图的推定上也不一致。此外,对商标侵权未遂的判决也不符合约旦刑法的一般原则。该研究建议,约旦制度应考虑改进立法,以确保在约旦加强对商标的保护。建议修改第37条,对驰名商标作出规定,对犯罪意图作出更明确的规定,以符合无罪推定的原则,增强刑罚的威慑力,并与刑罚速度趋近于国际法律惯例。本文旨在解决这些差距,促进关于知识产权目的的辩论,并为那些希望加强对商标侵权的立法保护以促进经济稳定和消费者安全的政策制定者提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The crime of counterfeiting or imitating a trademark under Jordanian trademarks law

This paper critically analyzes the crime of counterfeiting or imitating trademarks under Article 37/1/a of the Jordanian Trademarks Law No. 33 of 1952 and its amendments. Recognizing a significant gap in the alignment of Jordanian trademark laws with international standards, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of current legislation in protecting trademark owners' rights and consumer interests. The importance of this research lies in the escalating instances of trademark infringement, which undermine consumer trust, hinder economic growth, and affect Jordan's compliance with international treaties. Employing descriptive, analytical, and comparative methodologies, the paper examines the material, moral, and subjective elements of the crime, explores jurisprudential and judicial debates on criminal intent, and compares Jordanian legal provisions with those of other jurisdictions. The study shows that, while Jordanian law prohibits the counterfeit of marks, it does not specifically protect well-known marks, and it is inconsistent in the presumption of intention to commit a crime. Moreover, the sentence for attempted trademark infringement does not align with the general principles of Jordanian criminal law. The study recommends that the Jordanian system should consider legislative improvements to ensure stronger protection for trademarks in Jordan. It will also advise to amend Article 37 to set provision for well-known trademarks and more delimitative provisions on criminal intent to conform to the dowry of presumption of innocence, enhance deterrent in penalties, and to be in line with penalty slow down to the international law practice. This paper seeks to address these gaps, contribute to the debate about the purpose of intellectual property rights, and provide suggestions for policymakers who are looking towards enhancing legislative protection from trademark infringement to promote increased economic stability and consumer safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信