生物剽窃和美容品牌?化妆品和护肤公司的专利趋势

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
David J. Jefferson, Daniel F. Robinson
{"title":"生物剽窃和美容品牌?化妆品和护肤公司的专利趋势","authors":"David J. Jefferson,&nbsp;Daniel F. Robinson","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Concerns about the fairness and equity of ‘biodiscovery’ research endure despite the creation of legal frameworks designed to regulate access and benefit sharing involving genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge. While some industries that engage in biodiscovery have been the subject of sustained scrutiny, others have received scant scholarly attention. We evaluate the potential misappropriation of plant biodiversity and traditional knowledge in the cosmetics industry. To do so, we conducted a patent landscape analysis focusing on intellectual property claims that cosmetics firms have made concerning 12 plant species for which there exists extensive traditional knowledge of uses to improve the condition of skin and hair, or for other aesthetic purposes. The results demonstrate that cosmetics companies regularly claim intellectual property for uses of all 12 species, in multiple territories. There is little evidence to suggest that major firms seek prior informed consent for the use of genetic resources or traditional knowledge, or that they share benefits with local providers. The potential that the misappropriation of Indigenous knowledge is occurring in the cosmetics industry has important social and environmental justice implications, and this sector should be subjected to increased scrutiny.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"28 2","pages":"640-664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12348","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biopiracy and beauty brands? patent trends of cosmetics and skin care companies\",\"authors\":\"David J. Jefferson,&nbsp;Daniel F. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jwip.12348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Concerns about the fairness and equity of ‘biodiscovery’ research endure despite the creation of legal frameworks designed to regulate access and benefit sharing involving genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge. While some industries that engage in biodiscovery have been the subject of sustained scrutiny, others have received scant scholarly attention. We evaluate the potential misappropriation of plant biodiversity and traditional knowledge in the cosmetics industry. To do so, we conducted a patent landscape analysis focusing on intellectual property claims that cosmetics firms have made concerning 12 plant species for which there exists extensive traditional knowledge of uses to improve the condition of skin and hair, or for other aesthetic purposes. The results demonstrate that cosmetics companies regularly claim intellectual property for uses of all 12 species, in multiple territories. There is little evidence to suggest that major firms seek prior informed consent for the use of genetic resources or traditional knowledge, or that they share benefits with local providers. The potential that the misappropriation of Indigenous knowledge is occurring in the cosmetics industry has important social and environmental justice implications, and this sector should be subjected to increased scrutiny.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"640-664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12348\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管建立了旨在规范涉及遗传资源和相关传统知识的获取和惠益分享的法律框架,但对“生物发现”研究的公平性和公平性的担忧仍然存在。虽然一些从事生物发现的行业一直是持续审查的对象,但其他行业却很少受到学术关注。我们评估了化妆品行业对植物生物多样性和传统知识的潜在盗用。为此,我们对化妆品公司提出的12种植物的知识产权要求进行了专利景观分析,这些植物在改善皮肤和头发状况或其他审美目的方面存在广泛的传统知识。研究结果表明,化妆品公司经常在多个地区为所有12个物种的使用申请知识产权。几乎没有证据表明大公司在使用遗传资源或传统知识时寻求事先知情同意,或者它们与当地提供者分享利益。在化妆品行业中发生的滥用土著知识的可能性具有重要的社会和环境正义影响,这一部门应该受到更多的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biopiracy and beauty brands? patent trends of cosmetics and skin care companies

Biopiracy and beauty brands? patent trends of cosmetics and skin care companies

Concerns about the fairness and equity of ‘biodiscovery’ research endure despite the creation of legal frameworks designed to regulate access and benefit sharing involving genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge. While some industries that engage in biodiscovery have been the subject of sustained scrutiny, others have received scant scholarly attention. We evaluate the potential misappropriation of plant biodiversity and traditional knowledge in the cosmetics industry. To do so, we conducted a patent landscape analysis focusing on intellectual property claims that cosmetics firms have made concerning 12 plant species for which there exists extensive traditional knowledge of uses to improve the condition of skin and hair, or for other aesthetic purposes. The results demonstrate that cosmetics companies regularly claim intellectual property for uses of all 12 species, in multiple territories. There is little evidence to suggest that major firms seek prior informed consent for the use of genetic resources or traditional knowledge, or that they share benefits with local providers. The potential that the misappropriation of Indigenous knowledge is occurring in the cosmetics industry has important social and environmental justice implications, and this sector should be subjected to increased scrutiny.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信