OCR信函显示了明确定义残疾申诉程序的重要性

Eric Lyerly Esq.
{"title":"OCR信函显示了明确定义残疾申诉程序的重要性","authors":"Eric Lyerly Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A recent OCR investigation shows why colleges and universities must distinguish their disability grievance processes from their processes for general misconduct grievances. Failing to make distinctions between these processes can impede students from pursuing grievances against faculty and others — and result in unlawful discrimination against the complainant in violation of Section 504.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 12","pages":"3-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OCR letter shows importance of clearly defining disability grievance process\",\"authors\":\"Eric Lyerly Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cala.41663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A recent OCR investigation shows why colleges and universities must distinguish their disability grievance processes from their processes for general misconduct grievances. Failing to make distinctions between these processes can impede students from pursuing grievances against faculty and others — and result in unlawful discrimination against the complainant in violation of Section 504.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"3-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campus Legal Advisor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的一项OCR调查显示了为什么学院和大学必须将他们的残疾申诉程序与他们的一般不当行为申诉程序区分开来。不区分这些过程可能会阻碍学生对教师和其他人的不满,并导致对投诉人的非法歧视,违反了第504条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OCR letter shows importance of clearly defining disability grievance process

A recent OCR investigation shows why colleges and universities must distinguish their disability grievance processes from their processes for general misconduct grievances. Failing to make distinctions between these processes can impede students from pursuing grievances against faculty and others — and result in unlawful discrimination against the complainant in violation of Section 504.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信