Giulia Bruschi, Valerio Ricciardi, Paolo De Marco, Daniela Origgi
{"title":"基于幻象的对比增强乳房x线照相术系统的比较分析:图像质量和性能评价","authors":"Giulia Bruschi, Valerio Ricciardi, Paolo De Marco, Daniela Origgi","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a technique that exploits the combination of two projections at different energies to produce an energy-subtracted (ES) image to highlight the uptake of iodinated contrast medium in breast lesions. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the performance of different CEM systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four mammography systems of different vendors (Fujifilm Amulet Innovality, Hologic 3Dimensions, IMS Giotto Class, GE Senographe Pristina) were compared employing a commercial dedicated phantom, equipped with a breast-equivalent target slab with four different iodine concentrations (IC) inserts. Acquisition parameters and average glandular dose (AGD) were collected at different phantom thicknesses (30–80 mm). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and linearity of IC response with phantom thickness were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>AGDs (mGy) were in ranges 0.82–3.10, 0.90–6.25, 1.08–3.30, and 0.74–3.63 for Fujifilm, Hologic, GE, and IMS, respectively. High-energy AGD accounted for up to 41.5%, 25.6%, 40.5%, and 23.8% of the total dose for Fujifilm, Hologic, IMS, and GE, respectively. CNR increased with IC and generally decreased with increasing phantom thickness. In recombined images, Hologic, Fujifilm, and GE showed good linearity of IC response with phantom thickness and overlapping trends (maximum error = 1%) for all thicknesses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Similarities and differences in image quality and dose were found depending on the different technical and image processing characteristics of the different vendors. Linearity of IC at various thicknesses might be further exploited in clinical scenarios to differentiate between suspicious breast lesions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70163","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phantom-based comparative analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography systems: Image quality and performance evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Bruschi, Valerio Ricciardi, Paolo De Marco, Daniela Origgi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a technique that exploits the combination of two projections at different energies to produce an energy-subtracted (ES) image to highlight the uptake of iodinated contrast medium in breast lesions. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the performance of different CEM systems.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four mammography systems of different vendors (Fujifilm Amulet Innovality, Hologic 3Dimensions, IMS Giotto Class, GE Senographe Pristina) were compared employing a commercial dedicated phantom, equipped with a breast-equivalent target slab with four different iodine concentrations (IC) inserts. Acquisition parameters and average glandular dose (AGD) were collected at different phantom thicknesses (30–80 mm). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and linearity of IC response with phantom thickness were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>AGDs (mGy) were in ranges 0.82–3.10, 0.90–6.25, 1.08–3.30, and 0.74–3.63 for Fujifilm, Hologic, GE, and IMS, respectively. High-energy AGD accounted for up to 41.5%, 25.6%, 40.5%, and 23.8% of the total dose for Fujifilm, Hologic, IMS, and GE, respectively. CNR increased with IC and generally decreased with increasing phantom thickness. In recombined images, Hologic, Fujifilm, and GE showed good linearity of IC response with phantom thickness and overlapping trends (maximum error = 1%) for all thicknesses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Similarities and differences in image quality and dose were found depending on the different technical and image processing characteristics of the different vendors. Linearity of IC at various thicknesses might be further exploited in clinical scenarios to differentiate between suspicious breast lesions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70163\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phantom-based comparative analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography systems: Image quality and performance evaluation
Purpose
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a technique that exploits the combination of two projections at different energies to produce an energy-subtracted (ES) image to highlight the uptake of iodinated contrast medium in breast lesions. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the performance of different CEM systems.
Methods
Four mammography systems of different vendors (Fujifilm Amulet Innovality, Hologic 3Dimensions, IMS Giotto Class, GE Senographe Pristina) were compared employing a commercial dedicated phantom, equipped with a breast-equivalent target slab with four different iodine concentrations (IC) inserts. Acquisition parameters and average glandular dose (AGD) were collected at different phantom thicknesses (30–80 mm). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and linearity of IC response with phantom thickness were evaluated.
Results
AGDs (mGy) were in ranges 0.82–3.10, 0.90–6.25, 1.08–3.30, and 0.74–3.63 for Fujifilm, Hologic, GE, and IMS, respectively. High-energy AGD accounted for up to 41.5%, 25.6%, 40.5%, and 23.8% of the total dose for Fujifilm, Hologic, IMS, and GE, respectively. CNR increased with IC and generally decreased with increasing phantom thickness. In recombined images, Hologic, Fujifilm, and GE showed good linearity of IC response with phantom thickness and overlapping trends (maximum error = 1%) for all thicknesses.
Conclusion
Similarities and differences in image quality and dose were found depending on the different technical and image processing characteristics of the different vendors. Linearity of IC at various thicknesses might be further exploited in clinical scenarios to differentiate between suspicious breast lesions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic