老年人埃德蒙顿虚弱量表的测量特性：系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 7.1 1区医学 Q1 NURSING

International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105161

Zi Rong Lee , Ling Jie Cheng , Ying Yee Yeo , Darryl Rolfson , Xi Vivien Wu

{"title":"老年人埃德蒙顿虚弱量表的测量特性：系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Zi Rong Lee , Ling Jie Cheng , Ying Yee Yeo , Darryl Rolfson , Xi Vivien Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty is a clinical condition characterised by heightened vulnerabilities to stressors and negative health consequences. The Edmonton Frail Scale is a prominent multidimensional tool for assessing frailty across various settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This review aimed to synthesise and evaluate the certainty of evidence and the quality of Edmonton Frail Scale in older adults aged 60 and above with respect to its reliability (test–retest, inter-rater) and construct validity (convergent, known-group).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><div>Older adults across clinical and community settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases from inception to 29 January 2024. An updated search in MEDLINE (PubMed) on 10 April 2025 identified no additional eligible articles. COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist was used for quality appraisal, and evidence synthesis followed COSMIN guidelines. Random-effects meta-analysis and univariate logistic regression was used to quantitatively synthesise evidence for reliability and construct validity, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty studies involving 3852 older adults were included. The original Edmonton Frail Scale demonstrated sufficient construct validity across most populations, supported by high certainty of evidence. However, construct validity was inconsistent in acute care populations and in studies using modified Edmonton Frail Scale versions, where content adaptations (e.g., omission of performance-based items) may have affected psychometric performance. Meta-regression revealed that modified versions were significantly less likely to yield positive validity ratings compared to the original Edmonton Frail Scale (OR = 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.09–0.95; p = 0.042). Test–retest and inter-rater reliability were sufficient, though heterogeneity was considerable, and certainty of evidence remained moderate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Edmonton Frail Scale shows good overall reliability and validity in assessing frailty among older adults, particularly in stable clinical or community settings. However, caution is warranted when using modified versions or applying the tool in acutely ill populations. Future studies should validate Edmonton Frail Scale adaptations and enhance the precision of reliability estimates, especially in underrepresented regions and high-risk subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42024504735).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 105161"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement properties of the Edmonton Frail Scale in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zi Rong Lee , Ling Jie Cheng , Ying Yee Yeo , Darryl Rolfson , Xi Vivien Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty is a clinical condition characterised by heightened vulnerabilities to stressors and negative health consequences. The Edmonton Frail Scale is a prominent multidimensional tool for assessing frailty across various settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This review aimed to synthesise and evaluate the certainty of evidence and the quality of Edmonton Frail Scale in older adults aged 60 and above with respect to its reliability (test–retest, inter-rater) and construct validity (convergent, known-group).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><div>Older adults across clinical and community settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases from inception to 29 January 2024. An updated search in MEDLINE (PubMed) on 10 April 2025 identified no additional eligible articles. COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist was used for quality appraisal, and evidence synthesis followed COSMIN guidelines. Random-effects meta-analysis and univariate logistic regression was used to quantitatively synthesise evidence for reliability and construct validity, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty studies involving 3852 older adults were included. The original Edmonton Frail Scale demonstrated sufficient construct validity across most populations, supported by high certainty of evidence. However, construct validity was inconsistent in acute care populations and in studies using modified Edmonton Frail Scale versions, where content adaptations (e.g., omission of performance-based items) may have affected psychometric performance. Meta-regression revealed that modified versions were significantly less likely to yield positive validity ratings compared to the original Edmonton Frail Scale (OR = 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.09–0.95; p = 0.042). Test–retest and inter-rater reliability were sufficient, though heterogeneity was considerable, and certainty of evidence remained moderate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Edmonton Frail Scale shows good overall reliability and validity in assessing frailty among older adults, particularly in stable clinical or community settings. However, caution is warranted when using modified versions or applying the tool in acutely ill populations. Future studies should validate Edmonton Frail Scale adaptations and enhance the precision of reliability estimates, especially in underrepresented regions and high-risk subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42024504735).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925001713\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925001713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

虚弱是一种临床症状，其特征是对压力源的脆弱性增加和对健康的负面影响。埃德蒙顿脆弱量表是一个突出的多维工具，用于评估各种环境下的脆弱性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Measurement properties of the Edmonton Frail Scale in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Frailty is a clinical condition characterised by heightened vulnerabilities to stressors and negative health consequences. The Edmonton Frail Scale is a prominent multidimensional tool for assessing frailty across various settings.

Objectives

This review aimed to synthesise and evaluate the certainty of evidence and the quality of Edmonton Frail Scale in older adults aged 60 and above with respect to its reliability (test–retest, inter-rater) and construct validity (convergent, known-group).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting and participants

Older adults across clinical and community settings.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases from inception to 29 January 2024. An updated search in MEDLINE (PubMed) on 10 April 2025 identified no additional eligible articles. COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist was used for quality appraisal, and evidence synthesis followed COSMIN guidelines. Random-effects meta-analysis and univariate logistic regression was used to quantitatively synthesise evidence for reliability and construct validity, respectively.

Results

Twenty studies involving 3852 older adults were included. The original Edmonton Frail Scale demonstrated sufficient construct validity across most populations, supported by high certainty of evidence. However, construct validity was inconsistent in acute care populations and in studies using modified Edmonton Frail Scale versions, where content adaptations (e.g., omission of performance-based items) may have affected psychometric performance. Meta-regression revealed that modified versions were significantly less likely to yield positive validity ratings compared to the original Edmonton Frail Scale (OR = 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.09–0.95; p = 0.042). Test–retest and inter-rater reliability were sufficient, though heterogeneity was considerable, and certainty of evidence remained moderate.

Conclusion

The Edmonton Frail Scale shows good overall reliability and validity in assessing frailty among older adults, particularly in stable clinical or community settings. However, caution is warranted when using modified versions or applying the tool in acutely ill populations. Future studies should validate Edmonton Frail Scale adaptations and enhance the precision of reliability estimates, especially in underrepresented regions and high-risk subgroups.

Registration

The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42024504735).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Nursing Studies 医学-护理

CiteScore

15.00

自引率

2.50%

发文量

181

审稿时长

21 days

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).