用于CT肺血管造影报告生成和结果预测的视觉语言模型

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zhusi Zhong, Yuli Wang, Jing Wu, Wen-Chi Hsu, Vin Somasundaram, Lulu Bi, Shreyas Kulkarni, Zhuoqi Ma, Scott Collins, Grayson Baird, Sun Ho Ahn, Xue Feng, Ihab Kamel, Cheng Ting Lin, Colin Greineder, Michael Atalay, Zhicheng Jiao, Harrison Bai
{"title":"用于CT肺血管造影报告生成和结果预测的视觉语言模型","authors":"Zhusi Zhong, Yuli Wang, Jing Wu, Wen-Chi Hsu, Vin Somasundaram, Lulu Bi, Shreyas Kulkarni, Zhuoqi Ma, Scott Collins, Grayson Baird, Sun Ho Ahn, Xue Feng, Ihab Kamel, Cheng Ting Lin, Colin Greineder, Michael Atalay, Zhicheng Jiao, Harrison Bai","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01807-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate and comprehensive interpretation of pulmonary embolism (PE) from Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) scans remains a clinical challenge due to the limited specificity and structure of existing AI tools. We propose an agent-based framework that integrates Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for detecting 32 PE-related abnormalities and Large Language Models (LLMs) for structured report generation. Trained on over 69,000 CTPA studies from 24,890 patients across Brown University Health (BUH), Johns Hopkins University (JHU), and the INSPECT dataset from Stanford, the model demonstrates strong performance in abnormality classification and report generation. For abnormality classification, it achieved AUROC scores of 0.788 (BUH), 0.754 (INSPECT), and 0.710 (JHU), with corresponding BERT-F1 scores of 0.891, 0.829, and 0.842. The abnormality-guided reporting strategy consistently outperformed the organ-based and holistic captioning baselines. For survival prediction, a multimodal fusion model that incorporates imaging, clinical variables, diagnostic outputs, and generated reports achieved concordance indices of 0.863 (BUH) and 0.731 (JHU), outperforming traditional PESI scores. This framework provides a clinically meaningful and interpretable solution for end-to-end PE diagnosis, structured reporting, and outcome prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vision-language model for report generation and outcome prediction in CT pulmonary angiogram\",\"authors\":\"Zhusi Zhong, Yuli Wang, Jing Wu, Wen-Chi Hsu, Vin Somasundaram, Lulu Bi, Shreyas Kulkarni, Zhuoqi Ma, Scott Collins, Grayson Baird, Sun Ho Ahn, Xue Feng, Ihab Kamel, Cheng Ting Lin, Colin Greineder, Michael Atalay, Zhicheng Jiao, Harrison Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01807-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate and comprehensive interpretation of pulmonary embolism (PE) from Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) scans remains a clinical challenge due to the limited specificity and structure of existing AI tools. We propose an agent-based framework that integrates Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for detecting 32 PE-related abnormalities and Large Language Models (LLMs) for structured report generation. Trained on over 69,000 CTPA studies from 24,890 patients across Brown University Health (BUH), Johns Hopkins University (JHU), and the INSPECT dataset from Stanford, the model demonstrates strong performance in abnormality classification and report generation. For abnormality classification, it achieved AUROC scores of 0.788 (BUH), 0.754 (INSPECT), and 0.710 (JHU), with corresponding BERT-F1 scores of 0.891, 0.829, and 0.842. The abnormality-guided reporting strategy consistently outperformed the organ-based and holistic captioning baselines. For survival prediction, a multimodal fusion model that incorporates imaging, clinical variables, diagnostic outputs, and generated reports achieved concordance indices of 0.863 (BUH) and 0.731 (JHU), outperforming traditional PESI scores. This framework provides a clinically meaningful and interpretable solution for end-to-end PE diagnosis, structured reporting, and outcome prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01807-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01807-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于现有人工智能工具的特异性和结构有限,从ct肺血管造影(CTPA)扫描中准确和全面地解释肺栓塞(PE)仍然是一个临床挑战。我们提出了一个基于代理的框架,该框架集成了用于检测32种pe相关异常的视觉语言模型(VLMs)和用于结构化报告生成的大型语言模型(LLMs)。该模型接受了来自布朗大学健康中心(BUH)、约翰霍普金斯大学(JHU)和斯坦福大学INSPECT数据集的24,890名患者的69,000多项CTPA研究的训练,在异常分类和报告生成方面表现出很强的性能。异常分类的AUROC得分分别为0.788 (BUH)、0.754 (INSPECT)和0.710 (JHU),相应的BERT-F1得分分别为0.891、0.829和0.842。异常引导的报告策略始终优于基于器官和整体字幕基线。对于生存预测,多模态融合模型结合了影像学、临床变量、诊断输出和生成报告,一致性指数为0.863 (BUH)和0.731 (JHU),优于传统的PESI评分。该框架为端到端的PE诊断、结构化报告和结果预测提供了临床意义和可解释的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Vision-language model for report generation and outcome prediction in CT pulmonary angiogram

Vision-language model for report generation and outcome prediction in CT pulmonary angiogram

Accurate and comprehensive interpretation of pulmonary embolism (PE) from Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) scans remains a clinical challenge due to the limited specificity and structure of existing AI tools. We propose an agent-based framework that integrates Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for detecting 32 PE-related abnormalities and Large Language Models (LLMs) for structured report generation. Trained on over 69,000 CTPA studies from 24,890 patients across Brown University Health (BUH), Johns Hopkins University (JHU), and the INSPECT dataset from Stanford, the model demonstrates strong performance in abnormality classification and report generation. For abnormality classification, it achieved AUROC scores of 0.788 (BUH), 0.754 (INSPECT), and 0.710 (JHU), with corresponding BERT-F1 scores of 0.891, 0.829, and 0.842. The abnormality-guided reporting strategy consistently outperformed the organ-based and holistic captioning baselines. For survival prediction, a multimodal fusion model that incorporates imaging, clinical variables, diagnostic outputs, and generated reports achieved concordance indices of 0.863 (BUH) and 0.731 (JHU), outperforming traditional PESI scores. This framework provides a clinically meaningful and interpretable solution for end-to-end PE diagnosis, structured reporting, and outcome prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信