影响质量改进计划实施的因素。

Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes, Lambert Farand, Marie-Pascale Pomey, Francois Champagne
{"title":"影响质量改进计划实施的因素。","authors":"Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes, Lambert Farand, Marie-Pascale Pomey, Francois Champagne","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to poor-quality care has adverse effects in terms of morbidity and mortality. Hence, the need to find strategies to improve processes and systems to satisfy patients and enable access to good-quality care. In Haiti, the Ministry of Public Health and Population, donors, and technical and financial partners emphasize quality improvement programs such as the HEALTHQUAL program. It has become an essential approach in the Haitian health system. While quality improvement programs are relatively new to Haiti, little data is available on the factors that can facilitate or hinder their implementation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>An evaluative research (implementation analysis) using a multiple case study design was conducted with a qualitative approach. Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted, observations were made, and documents were analysed. Data analysis was performed using the constant comparative method and a synthetic analysis framework with predefined categories (program components, facilitating factors, inhibiting factors, mechanisms, consequences, and interactions between model elements). Subsequently, these categories were analysed using Atlas.ti software, with additional codes emerging and being incorporated into the predefined categories. Memos and a research journal were used during data collection and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main facilitating factors include collaboration between the institutional and community levels, leadership, coordination and collaboration within a multidisciplinary team, external pressures, the characteristics of the networks, team ownership of the process, and quality infrastructure.The main inhibiting factors comprise the socio-political context, organisational culture, the influence of previous decisions (policy legacy), provider perceptions of HEALTHQUAL, the lack of accountability mechanisms, an unsuitable health information system, and resource unavailability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these observations, leaders and decision-makers are encouraged to consider these contextual factors when planning and implementing the HEALTHQUAL program in Haiti. It is important to consider a range of contextual variables to understand implementation at any given time.</p>","PeriodicalId":520651,"journal":{"name":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that Influence the Implementation of Quality Improvement Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes, Lambert Farand, Marie-Pascale Pomey, Francois Champagne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to poor-quality care has adverse effects in terms of morbidity and mortality. Hence, the need to find strategies to improve processes and systems to satisfy patients and enable access to good-quality care. In Haiti, the Ministry of Public Health and Population, donors, and technical and financial partners emphasize quality improvement programs such as the HEALTHQUAL program. It has become an essential approach in the Haitian health system. While quality improvement programs are relatively new to Haiti, little data is available on the factors that can facilitate or hinder their implementation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>An evaluative research (implementation analysis) using a multiple case study design was conducted with a qualitative approach. Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted, observations were made, and documents were analysed. Data analysis was performed using the constant comparative method and a synthetic analysis framework with predefined categories (program components, facilitating factors, inhibiting factors, mechanisms, consequences, and interactions between model elements). Subsequently, these categories were analysed using Atlas.ti software, with additional codes emerging and being incorporated into the predefined categories. Memos and a research journal were used during data collection and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main facilitating factors include collaboration between the institutional and community levels, leadership, coordination and collaboration within a multidisciplinary team, external pressures, the characteristics of the networks, team ownership of the process, and quality infrastructure.The main inhibiting factors comprise the socio-political context, organisational culture, the influence of previous decisions (policy legacy), provider perceptions of HEALTHQUAL, the lack of accountability mechanisms, an unsuitable health information system, and resource unavailability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these observations, leaders and decision-makers are encouraged to consider these contextual factors when planning and implementing the HEALTHQUAL program in Haiti. It is important to consider a range of contextual variables to understand implementation at any given time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:获得低质量的护理在发病率和死亡率方面具有不利影响。因此,需要找到改进流程和系统的策略,以满足患者并使其能够获得高质量的护理。在海地,公共卫生和人口部、捐助者以及技术和金融合作伙伴强调质量改进方案,如HEALTHQUAL方案。它已成为海地卫生系统的一种基本方法。虽然质量改进项目对海地来说相对较新,但关于促进或阻碍其实施的因素的数据很少。方法:评估研究(实施分析)使用多案例研究设计与定性的方法进行。进行了38次半结构化访谈,进行了观察,并对文件进行了分析。数据分析使用恒定比较法和具有预定义类别(程序组件、促进因素、抑制因素、机制、后果以及模型元素之间的相互作用)的综合分析框架进行。随后,使用Atlas对这些类别进行分析。Ti软件,有额外的代码出现,并被纳入预定义的类别。在数据收集和分析过程中使用了备忘录和研究期刊。结果:主要的促进因素包括机构和社区之间的协作、领导、多学科团队内部的协调和协作、外部压力、网络特征、过程的团队所有权和质量基础设施。主要的抑制因素包括社会政治背景、组织文化、先前决定的影响(政策遗产)、提供者对HEALTHQUAL的看法、缺乏问责机制、不适当的卫生信息系统和资源不可用。结论:基于这些观察,鼓励领导人和决策者在海地规划和实施HEALTHQUAL项目时考虑这些背景因素。在任何给定时间,考虑一系列上下文变量来理解实现是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors that Influence the Implementation of Quality Improvement Programs.

Introduction: Access to poor-quality care has adverse effects in terms of morbidity and mortality. Hence, the need to find strategies to improve processes and systems to satisfy patients and enable access to good-quality care. In Haiti, the Ministry of Public Health and Population, donors, and technical and financial partners emphasize quality improvement programs such as the HEALTHQUAL program. It has become an essential approach in the Haitian health system. While quality improvement programs are relatively new to Haiti, little data is available on the factors that can facilitate or hinder their implementation.

Methodology: An evaluative research (implementation analysis) using a multiple case study design was conducted with a qualitative approach. Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted, observations were made, and documents were analysed. Data analysis was performed using the constant comparative method and a synthetic analysis framework with predefined categories (program components, facilitating factors, inhibiting factors, mechanisms, consequences, and interactions between model elements). Subsequently, these categories were analysed using Atlas.ti software, with additional codes emerging and being incorporated into the predefined categories. Memos and a research journal were used during data collection and analysis.

Results: The main facilitating factors include collaboration between the institutional and community levels, leadership, coordination and collaboration within a multidisciplinary team, external pressures, the characteristics of the networks, team ownership of the process, and quality infrastructure.The main inhibiting factors comprise the socio-political context, organisational culture, the influence of previous decisions (policy legacy), provider perceptions of HEALTHQUAL, the lack of accountability mechanisms, an unsuitable health information system, and resource unavailability.

Conclusion: Based on these observations, leaders and decision-makers are encouraged to consider these contextual factors when planning and implementing the HEALTHQUAL program in Haiti. It is important to consider a range of contextual variables to understand implementation at any given time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信