碳酸氢钠与等渗盐水预防造影剂肾病:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Colombia Medica Pub Date : 2015-09-30
Carlos Andres Zapata-Chica, Diana Bello Marquez, Lina Maria Serna-Higuita, John Fredy Nieto-Ríos, Fabian David Casas-Arroyave, Jorge Hernando Donado-Gómez
{"title":"碳酸氢钠与等渗盐水预防造影剂肾病:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Carlos Andres Zapata-Chica, Diana Bello Marquez, Lina Maria Serna-Higuita, John Fredy Nieto-Ríos, Fabian David Casas-Arroyave, Jorge Hernando Donado-Gómez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Contrast-induced nephropathy is one of the main causes of acute kidney injury and increased hospital-acquired morbidity and mortality. The use of sodium bicarbonate for nephroprotection has emerged as a preventative strategy; however, its efficacy is controversial compared to other strategies, such as hydration using 0.9% saline solution.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate vs. hydration using 0.9% saline solution to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of studies registered in the COCHRANE, PUBMED, MEDLINE, LILACS, SCIELO and EMBASE databases was conducted. Randomized controlled studies that evaluated the use of 0.9% saline solution vs. sodium bicarbonate to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies (5,686 patients) were included. Sodium bicarbonate did not decrease the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.02 to 0.03; p= 0.83; I(2)= 0%). No significant differences were found in the demand for renal replacement therapy (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.01 to 0-01; I(2)= 0%; p= 0.99) or in mortality (RD= -0.00; 95% CI= -0.001 to 0.001; I(2)= 0%; p= 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sodium bicarbonate administration is not superior to the use of 0.9% saline solution for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with risk factors, nor is it better at reducing mortality or the need for renal replacement therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50667,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Medica","volume":"46 3","pages":"90-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline solution to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy : a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Andres Zapata-Chica, Diana Bello Marquez, Lina Maria Serna-Higuita, John Fredy Nieto-Ríos, Fabian David Casas-Arroyave, Jorge Hernando Donado-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Contrast-induced nephropathy is one of the main causes of acute kidney injury and increased hospital-acquired morbidity and mortality. The use of sodium bicarbonate for nephroprotection has emerged as a preventative strategy; however, its efficacy is controversial compared to other strategies, such as hydration using 0.9% saline solution.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate vs. hydration using 0.9% saline solution to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of studies registered in the COCHRANE, PUBMED, MEDLINE, LILACS, SCIELO and EMBASE databases was conducted. Randomized controlled studies that evaluated the use of 0.9% saline solution vs. sodium bicarbonate to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies (5,686 patients) were included. Sodium bicarbonate did not decrease the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.02 to 0.03; p= 0.83; I(2)= 0%). No significant differences were found in the demand for renal replacement therapy (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.01 to 0-01; I(2)= 0%; p= 0.99) or in mortality (RD= -0.00; 95% CI= -0.001 to 0.001; I(2)= 0%; p= 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sodium bicarbonate administration is not superior to the use of 0.9% saline solution for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with risk factors, nor is it better at reducing mortality or the need for renal replacement therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colombia Medica\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"90-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colombia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

造影剂肾病是急性肾损伤的主要原因之一,并增加了医院获得性发病率和死亡率。使用碳酸氢钠进行肾保护已成为一种预防策略;然而,与其他策略(如使用0.9%盐水溶液补水)相比,其疗效存在争议。目的:比较碳酸氢钠与0.9%生理盐水水化对造影剂所致急性肾损伤的预防效果。方法:系统回顾在COCHRANE、PUBMED、MEDLINE、LILACS、SCIELO和EMBASE数据库中注册的研究。纳入了评估使用0.9%生理盐水溶液与碳酸氢钠预防造影剂肾病的随机对照研究。结果:共纳入22项研究(5686例患者)。碳酸氢钠不能降低造影剂肾病的风险(RD= 0.00;95% CI= -0.02 ~ 0.03;p = 0.83;(2) = 0%)。两组患者对肾脏替代治疗的需求差异无统计学意义(RD= 0.00;95% CI= -0.01 ~ 0-01;(2) = 0%;p= 0.99)或死亡率(RD= -0.00;95% CI= -0.001 ~ 0.001;(2) = 0%;p = 0.51)。结论:在有危险因素的患者中,碳酸氢钠在预防造影剂肾病方面并不优于0.9%生理盐水,在降低死亡率或肾脏替代治疗方面也不优于0.9%生理盐水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline solution to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline solution to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline solution to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline solution to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Contrast-induced nephropathy is one of the main causes of acute kidney injury and increased hospital-acquired morbidity and mortality. The use of sodium bicarbonate for nephroprotection has emerged as a preventative strategy; however, its efficacy is controversial compared to other strategies, such as hydration using 0.9% saline solution.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate vs. hydration using 0.9% saline solution to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

Methods: A systematic review of studies registered in the COCHRANE, PUBMED, MEDLINE, LILACS, SCIELO and EMBASE databases was conducted. Randomized controlled studies that evaluated the use of 0.9% saline solution vs. sodium bicarbonate to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy were included.

Results: A total of 22 studies (5,686 patients) were included. Sodium bicarbonate did not decrease the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.02 to 0.03; p= 0.83; I(2)= 0%). No significant differences were found in the demand for renal replacement therapy (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.01 to 0-01; I(2)= 0%; p= 0.99) or in mortality (RD= -0.00; 95% CI= -0.001 to 0.001; I(2)= 0%; p= 0.51).

Conclusions: Sodium bicarbonate administration is not superior to the use of 0.9% saline solution for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with risk factors, nor is it better at reducing mortality or the need for renal replacement therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colombia Medica
Colombia Medica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Colombia Médica is an international peer-reviewed medical journal that will consider any original contribution that advances or illuminates medical science or practice, or that educates to the journal''s’ readers.The journal is owned by a non-profit organization, Universidad del Valle, and serves the scientific community strictly following the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) recommendations of policies on publication ethics policies for medical journals. Colombia Médica publishes original research articles, viewpoints and reviews in all areas of medical science and clinical practice. However, Colombia Médica gives the highest priority to papers on general and internal medicine, public health and primary health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信