基于肿瘤核心和边缘代谢组学数据的胶质母细胞瘤患者生存分层。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dylan A Goodin, Hunter A Miller, Xinmin Yin, Xiang Zhang, Joseph Chen, Brian J Williams, Hermann B Frieboes
{"title":"基于肿瘤核心和边缘代谢组学数据的胶质母细胞瘤患者生存分层。","authors":"Dylan A Goodin, Hunter A Miller, Xinmin Yin, Xiang Zhang, Joseph Chen, Brian J Williams, Hermann B Frieboes","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.JNS242330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spatial metabolic differences recently found in glioblastoma (GBM) have been linked to the infiltrating nature of the tumor edge tissue, which is mostly unresectable, and to the tumor core tissue, which resists therapy. The impact of metabolic dysregulation in core and edge GBM tissues on patient survival remains unclear. This study evaluated metabolites obtained from core and edge GBM tissues at the time of resection as biomarkers to risk stratify patients in terms of overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired core and edge tumor samples from 27 patients with glioma obtained after craniotomy were evaluated postsurgery with high-resolution 2D liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry, and metabolomic data for grade IV samples (n = 21) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. GBM patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups via a linear equation based on log-transformed signal intensities of key metabolites. Risk scores were generated by summing the product of weights and metabolite signal intensities for each patient's tumor. Weights for significant metabolites were calculated by scaling the univariable Cox proportional hazard ratio for each metabolite by the standard error. For risk score validation, OS events were predicted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting model with Linear Booster (XGBL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified 6 significant metabolites in core tissue and 5 in edge tissue, respectively. Key metabolites in core and edge tissue identified through univariable Cox regression analyses combined with covariates were used to generate multivariable Cox regression models, with edge metabolites remaining significant after correction by patient sex and age at resection. Risk scores based on either 4 core or 11 edge metabolites, or the combination of both, with covariates, generated multivariable Cox regression models significantly associated with OS. Risk score derived from core metabolites remained significant after correction by covariates and was validated with XGBL classification model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.876).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OS of patients with GBM can be stratified based on metabolomic differences between core and edge tumor tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratification of glioblastoma patient survival based on tumor core and edge metabolomic data.\",\"authors\":\"Dylan A Goodin, Hunter A Miller, Xinmin Yin, Xiang Zhang, Joseph Chen, Brian J Williams, Hermann B Frieboes\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.3.JNS242330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spatial metabolic differences recently found in glioblastoma (GBM) have been linked to the infiltrating nature of the tumor edge tissue, which is mostly unresectable, and to the tumor core tissue, which resists therapy. The impact of metabolic dysregulation in core and edge GBM tissues on patient survival remains unclear. This study evaluated metabolites obtained from core and edge GBM tissues at the time of resection as biomarkers to risk stratify patients in terms of overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired core and edge tumor samples from 27 patients with glioma obtained after craniotomy were evaluated postsurgery with high-resolution 2D liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry, and metabolomic data for grade IV samples (n = 21) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. GBM patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups via a linear equation based on log-transformed signal intensities of key metabolites. Risk scores were generated by summing the product of weights and metabolite signal intensities for each patient's tumor. Weights for significant metabolites were calculated by scaling the univariable Cox proportional hazard ratio for each metabolite by the standard error. For risk score validation, OS events were predicted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting model with Linear Booster (XGBL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified 6 significant metabolites in core tissue and 5 in edge tissue, respectively. Key metabolites in core and edge tissue identified through univariable Cox regression analyses combined with covariates were used to generate multivariable Cox regression models, with edge metabolites remaining significant after correction by patient sex and age at resection. Risk scores based on either 4 core or 11 edge metabolites, or the combination of both, with covariates, generated multivariable Cox regression models significantly associated with OS. Risk score derived from core metabolites remained significant after correction by covariates and was validated with XGBL classification model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.876).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OS of patients with GBM can be stratified based on metabolomic differences between core and edge tumor tissues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.JNS242330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.JNS242330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中发现的空间代谢差异与肿瘤边缘组织的浸润性有关,而肿瘤边缘组织大多不可切除,而肿瘤核心组织则抵抗治疗。核心和边缘GBM组织代谢失调对患者生存的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了切除时从GBM核心和边缘组织获得的代谢物作为生物标志物,根据总生存期(OS)对患者进行风险分层。方法:采用高分辨率2D液相色谱-质谱/质谱法对27例脑胶质瘤患者术后获得的成对核心和边缘肿瘤样本进行评估,并对IV级样本(n = 21)的代谢组学数据进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析和单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归模型分析。通过基于关键代谢物的对数变换信号强度的线性方程,将GBM患者分为低危组和高危组。风险评分是通过对每个患者肿瘤的重量和代谢物信号强度的总和来产生的。通过标准误差缩放每种代谢物的单变量Cox比例风险比,计算重要代谢物的权重。对于风险评分验证,使用带有线性助推器(XGBL)的极端梯度增强模型预测OS事件。结果:Kaplan-Meier生存分析鉴定出核心组织中有6种显著代谢物,边缘组织中有5种显著代谢物。通过单变量Cox回归分析结合协变量确定核心和边缘组织中的关键代谢物,生成多变量Cox回归模型,边缘代谢物在经患者性别和年龄校正后仍具有显著性。基于4种核心代谢物或11种边缘代谢物的风险评分,或两者结合,与协变量生成与OS显著相关的多变量Cox回归模型。由核心代谢物得出的风险评分经协变量校正后仍具有显著性,并采用XGBL分类模型进行验证(受试者工作特征曲线下面积= 0.876)。结论:GBM患者的OS可根据核心和边缘肿瘤组织的代谢组学差异进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stratification of glioblastoma patient survival based on tumor core and edge metabolomic data.

Objective: Spatial metabolic differences recently found in glioblastoma (GBM) have been linked to the infiltrating nature of the tumor edge tissue, which is mostly unresectable, and to the tumor core tissue, which resists therapy. The impact of metabolic dysregulation in core and edge GBM tissues on patient survival remains unclear. This study evaluated metabolites obtained from core and edge GBM tissues at the time of resection as biomarkers to risk stratify patients in terms of overall survival (OS).

Methods: Paired core and edge tumor samples from 27 patients with glioma obtained after craniotomy were evaluated postsurgery with high-resolution 2D liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry, and metabolomic data for grade IV samples (n = 21) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. GBM patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups via a linear equation based on log-transformed signal intensities of key metabolites. Risk scores were generated by summing the product of weights and metabolite signal intensities for each patient's tumor. Weights for significant metabolites were calculated by scaling the univariable Cox proportional hazard ratio for each metabolite by the standard error. For risk score validation, OS events were predicted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting model with Linear Booster (XGBL).

Results: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified 6 significant metabolites in core tissue and 5 in edge tissue, respectively. Key metabolites in core and edge tissue identified through univariable Cox regression analyses combined with covariates were used to generate multivariable Cox regression models, with edge metabolites remaining significant after correction by patient sex and age at resection. Risk scores based on either 4 core or 11 edge metabolites, or the combination of both, with covariates, generated multivariable Cox regression models significantly associated with OS. Risk score derived from core metabolites remained significant after correction by covariates and was validated with XGBL classification model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.876).

Conclusions: OS of patients with GBM can be stratified based on metabolomic differences between core and edge tumor tissues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信