“那些风险,那些预防工作,这是家庭医学的基石”:初级保健提供者之间沟通2型糖尿病风险的福柯话语分析。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wendy M Blunt, Jennifer D Irwin, Robert J Petrella, Jacob Shelley, Maxwell J Smith
{"title":"“那些风险,那些预防工作,这是家庭医学的基石”:初级保健提供者之间沟通2型糖尿病风险的福柯话语分析。","authors":"Wendy M Blunt, Jennifer D Irwin, Robert J Petrella, Jacob Shelley, Maxwell J Smith","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02899-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With estimates suggesting 350 million individuals are at-risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), there is an urgent need to critically understand the processes of risk communication with primary care providers. Prior research has shown that primary care is the most likely place where initial conversations with a patients about T2D risk occur, but there remains a paucity of research exploring what may govern this communication. The purpose of this study was to critically explore discourses of risk for preventing T2D from the perspective of primary care providers. Semi-structured interviews (n = 14) were conducted with primary care providers including family physicians (n = 4), medical residents (n = 2), nurses (n = 3), dietitians (n = 4), and a pharmacist (n = 1) working in family health team (FHT) clinics in Southwestern, Ontario, Canada. Foucauldian Discourse Analysis through thematic analysis was applied to analyze the data and generate themes detailing how provider communications about risk for T2D are governed through discourse. Themes included: (1) patient-centred practice; (2) diagnosing prediabetes; (3) contextualizing symptoms; (4) time contingent; (5) adapting to patient knowledge; (6) carefully discussing weight; and (7) age as a balancing act. Overall, providers note using discourses of patient-centred practice to guide approaches to communicating about risk for T2D to patients. There are tensions with fulfilling this ideal patient-centred approach from more powerful discourses of prediabetes, assumptions about patient knowledge, and age that may override the ability to be patient-centred with communications about risk for T2D.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Those risks, that preventative work, that is the bedrock of family medicine\\\": A foucauldian discourse analysis of communicating risk for type 2 diabetes among primary care providers.\",\"authors\":\"Wendy M Blunt, Jennifer D Irwin, Robert J Petrella, Jacob Shelley, Maxwell J Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02899-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With estimates suggesting 350 million individuals are at-risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), there is an urgent need to critically understand the processes of risk communication with primary care providers. Prior research has shown that primary care is the most likely place where initial conversations with a patients about T2D risk occur, but there remains a paucity of research exploring what may govern this communication. The purpose of this study was to critically explore discourses of risk for preventing T2D from the perspective of primary care providers. Semi-structured interviews (n = 14) were conducted with primary care providers including family physicians (n = 4), medical residents (n = 2), nurses (n = 3), dietitians (n = 4), and a pharmacist (n = 1) working in family health team (FHT) clinics in Southwestern, Ontario, Canada. Foucauldian Discourse Analysis through thematic analysis was applied to analyze the data and generate themes detailing how provider communications about risk for T2D are governed through discourse. Themes included: (1) patient-centred practice; (2) diagnosing prediabetes; (3) contextualizing symptoms; (4) time contingent; (5) adapting to patient knowledge; (6) carefully discussing weight; and (7) age as a balancing act. Overall, providers note using discourses of patient-centred practice to guide approaches to communicating about risk for T2D to patients. There are tensions with fulfilling this ideal patient-centred approach from more powerful discourses of prediabetes, assumptions about patient knowledge, and age that may override the ability to be patient-centred with communications about risk for T2D.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02899-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02899-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据估计,有3.5亿人有2型糖尿病(T2D)的风险,迫切需要批判性地了解与初级保健提供者的风险沟通过程。先前的研究表明,初级保健是最有可能与患者就T2D风险进行初步对话的地方,但探索控制这种交流的因素的研究仍然缺乏。本研究的目的是从初级保健提供者的角度批判性地探讨预防T2D风险的话语。对加拿大安大略省西南部家庭健康小组(FHT)诊所的初级保健提供者进行了半结构化访谈(n = 14),包括家庭医生(n = 4)、住院医师(n = 2)、护士(n = 3)、营养师(n = 4)和药剂师(n = 1)。通过主题分析的福柯语篇分析被用于分析数据并生成主题,详细说明如何通过话语来管理提供者关于T2D风险的沟通。主题包括:(1)以患者为中心的实践;(2)诊断前驱糖尿病;(3)情境化症状;(4)时变;(5)适应患者知识;(6)认真讨论重量;(7)年龄是一种平衡行为。总的来说,提供者注意到使用以患者为中心的实践话语来指导与患者沟通T2D风险的方法。实现这种理想的以患者为中心的方法存在紧张关系,因为更强大的前驱糖尿病话语、对患者知识的假设和年龄可能会覆盖以患者为中心的t2dm风险沟通的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Those risks, that preventative work, that is the bedrock of family medicine": A foucauldian discourse analysis of communicating risk for type 2 diabetes among primary care providers.

With estimates suggesting 350 million individuals are at-risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), there is an urgent need to critically understand the processes of risk communication with primary care providers. Prior research has shown that primary care is the most likely place where initial conversations with a patients about T2D risk occur, but there remains a paucity of research exploring what may govern this communication. The purpose of this study was to critically explore discourses of risk for preventing T2D from the perspective of primary care providers. Semi-structured interviews (n = 14) were conducted with primary care providers including family physicians (n = 4), medical residents (n = 2), nurses (n = 3), dietitians (n = 4), and a pharmacist (n = 1) working in family health team (FHT) clinics in Southwestern, Ontario, Canada. Foucauldian Discourse Analysis through thematic analysis was applied to analyze the data and generate themes detailing how provider communications about risk for T2D are governed through discourse. Themes included: (1) patient-centred practice; (2) diagnosing prediabetes; (3) contextualizing symptoms; (4) time contingent; (5) adapting to patient knowledge; (6) carefully discussing weight; and (7) age as a balancing act. Overall, providers note using discourses of patient-centred practice to guide approaches to communicating about risk for T2D to patients. There are tensions with fulfilling this ideal patient-centred approach from more powerful discourses of prediabetes, assumptions about patient knowledge, and age that may override the ability to be patient-centred with communications about risk for T2D.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信