协作研究中的数据管理从研究人员开始:土壤CRC案例研究。

IF 4 1区 哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS
Nathan Robinson, Jude Channon, Simon Clarendon, David Medyckyj-Scott
{"title":"协作研究中的数据管理从研究人员开始:土壤CRC案例研究。","authors":"Nathan Robinson, Jude Channon, Simon Clarendon, David Medyckyj-Scott","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2525878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary research centers are central to the concept of collaborative science. A challenge to the success of these research centers is their \"data sharing readiness\" as a foundation of science integrity that underpins policy decisions and directions. To achieve data sharing readiness, understanding researchers' level of data maturity (their data management practices and understanding) is critical to improvement in data management and resultant research outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach of survey, focus group, and interviews was undertaken to understand where participants in a soil research collaboration were in their data maturity. The survey included a combination of multiple choice, open, and closed-ended questions linked to a set of overarching data management topics. Voluntary participants include farmer groups, universities, industry partners, and state government agencies from Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings were that researchers were largely unfamiliar with core concepts of data management and exhibit a low overall level of data maturity and data readiness. This was echoed by the desire of survey respondents to obtain further training, education, and support in data management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data readiness and providing researchers with a core set of data management skills will provide a pathway for high quality and enduring research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing data in collaborative research starts with the researcher: A Soil CRC case study.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Robinson, Jude Channon, Simon Clarendon, David Medyckyj-Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08989621.2025.2525878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary research centers are central to the concept of collaborative science. A challenge to the success of these research centers is their \\\"data sharing readiness\\\" as a foundation of science integrity that underpins policy decisions and directions. To achieve data sharing readiness, understanding researchers' level of data maturity (their data management practices and understanding) is critical to improvement in data management and resultant research outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach of survey, focus group, and interviews was undertaken to understand where participants in a soil research collaboration were in their data maturity. The survey included a combination of multiple choice, open, and closed-ended questions linked to a set of overarching data management topics. Voluntary participants include farmer groups, universities, industry partners, and state government agencies from Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings were that researchers were largely unfamiliar with core concepts of data management and exhibit a low overall level of data maturity and data readiness. This was echoed by the desire of survey respondents to obtain further training, education, and support in data management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data readiness and providing researchers with a core set of data management skills will provide a pathway for high quality and enduring research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2525878\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2525878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多学科和跨学科的研究中心是协作科学概念的核心。对这些研究中心成功的一个挑战是它们的“数据共享准备”,这是支撑政策决策和方向的科学诚信的基础。为了实现数据共享准备,了解研究人员的数据成熟度水平(他们的数据管理实践和理解)对于改善数据管理和最终的研究成果至关重要。方法:采用调查、焦点小组和访谈的混合方法来了解土壤研究合作参与者的数据成熟度。该调查包括多项选择题、开放式和封闭式问题,这些问题与一系列总体数据管理主题相关。自愿参与者包括来自澳大利亚和新西兰的农民团体、大学、行业合作伙伴和州政府机构。结果:主要发现是研究人员在很大程度上不熟悉数据管理的核心概念,并且表现出较低的数据成熟度和数据准备水平。受访者希望在数据管理方面获得进一步的培训、教育和支持。结论:数据准备和为研究人员提供一套核心数据管理技能将为高质量和持久的研究提供途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing data in collaborative research starts with the researcher: A Soil CRC case study.

Background: Multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary research centers are central to the concept of collaborative science. A challenge to the success of these research centers is their "data sharing readiness" as a foundation of science integrity that underpins policy decisions and directions. To achieve data sharing readiness, understanding researchers' level of data maturity (their data management practices and understanding) is critical to improvement in data management and resultant research outcomes.

Methods: A mixed methods approach of survey, focus group, and interviews was undertaken to understand where participants in a soil research collaboration were in their data maturity. The survey included a combination of multiple choice, open, and closed-ended questions linked to a set of overarching data management topics. Voluntary participants include farmer groups, universities, industry partners, and state government agencies from Australia and New Zealand.

Results: Key findings were that researchers were largely unfamiliar with core concepts of data management and exhibit a low overall level of data maturity and data readiness. This was echoed by the desire of survey respondents to obtain further training, education, and support in data management.

Conclusion: Data readiness and providing researchers with a core set of data management skills will provide a pathway for high quality and enduring research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.70%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信