Iván José Fuentes-Abolafio, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín, Juan Manuel Henriquez-Jurado, Luis Suso-Martí, Adrian Escriche-Escuder
{"title":"虚拟现实训练对中风患者上肢运动功能的孤立影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Iván José Fuentes-Abolafio, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín, Juan Manuel Henriquez-Jurado, Luis Suso-Martí, Adrian Escriche-Escuder","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To synthesize evidence on the effects of virtual reality (VR) as monotherapy on upper motor function in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and WOS were searched from inception to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were included (637 stroke patients, mean age 59.93 ± 6.52 years). The meta-analysis showed large effects sizes in VR interventions for upper extremity motor function and joint pain assessed with the Fugl-Meyer test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.03, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.49), being also superior when compared to a control group (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < 0.05, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.07). In contrast, these are not statistically significant when the analyses for motor function are done considering immersive or non-immersive VR. Non-immersive RV showed a large effect size on the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.20) and Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.35). RV also showed a medium effect size on the Action Research Arm Test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.61). These results were not significant when compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR as monotherapy improves upper limb motor function, being superior to other therapies in those functions assessed with the Fugl-Meyer scale. It is inconclusive if one VR modality is superior to another for improvements on upper limb motor function.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolated effects of virtual reality training on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Iván José Fuentes-Abolafio, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín, Juan Manuel Henriquez-Jurado, Luis Suso-Martí, Adrian Escriche-Escuder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To synthesize evidence on the effects of virtual reality (VR) as monotherapy on upper motor function in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and WOS were searched from inception to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were included (637 stroke patients, mean age 59.93 ± 6.52 years). The meta-analysis showed large effects sizes in VR interventions for upper extremity motor function and joint pain assessed with the Fugl-Meyer test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.03, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.49), being also superior when compared to a control group (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < 0.05, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.07). In contrast, these are not statistically significant when the analyses for motor function are done considering immersive or non-immersive VR. Non-immersive RV showed a large effect size on the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.20) and Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.35). RV also showed a medium effect size on the Action Research Arm Test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.61). These results were not significant when compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR as monotherapy improves upper limb motor function, being superior to other therapies in those functions assessed with the Fugl-Meyer scale. It is inconclusive if one VR modality is superior to another for improvements on upper limb motor function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:综合研究虚拟现实(VR)单药治疗对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响。方法:检索PubMed、PEDro、CINAHL和WOS,检索时间为建站至2024年12月。结果:纳入19项研究(637例脑卒中患者,平均年龄59.93±6.52岁)。meta分析显示,通过Fugl-Meyer检验评估,VR干预对上肢运动功能和关节疼痛的影响很大(Cohen’s d = 1.03, p d = 1.49),与对照组相比也更优越(Cohen’s d = 0.68, p d = 1.07)。相比之下,当考虑沉浸式或非沉浸式VR进行运动功能分析时,这些数据在统计上并不显著。非沉浸式RV对运动活动日志使用量(Cohen’s d = 1.20)和运动活动日志质量(Cohen’s d = 1.35)的影响较大。RV在行动研究臂检验中也显示中等效应量(Cohen’s d = 0.61)。与对照组相比,这些结果并不显著。结论:VR作为单一疗法可改善上肢运动功能,在Fugl-Meyer量表评估的功能方面优于其他疗法。在改善上肢运动功能方面,一种VR方式是否优于另一种方式尚无定论。
Isolated effects of virtual reality training on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: To synthesize evidence on the effects of virtual reality (VR) as monotherapy on upper motor function in stroke patients.
Methods: PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and WOS were searched from inception to December 2024.
Results: Nineteen studies were included (637 stroke patients, mean age 59.93 ± 6.52 years). The meta-analysis showed large effects sizes in VR interventions for upper extremity motor function and joint pain assessed with the Fugl-Meyer test (Cohen's d = 1.03, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.49), being also superior when compared to a control group (Cohen's d = 0.68, p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 1.07). In contrast, these are not statistically significant when the analyses for motor function are done considering immersive or non-immersive VR. Non-immersive RV showed a large effect size on the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use (Cohen's d = 1.20) and Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement (Cohen's d = 1.35). RV also showed a medium effect size on the Action Research Arm Test (Cohen's d = 0.61). These results were not significant when compared to a control group.
Conclusion: VR as monotherapy improves upper limb motor function, being superior to other therapies in those functions assessed with the Fugl-Meyer scale. It is inconclusive if one VR modality is superior to another for improvements on upper limb motor function.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.