虚拟现实训练对中风患者上肢运动功能的孤立影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Iván José Fuentes-Abolafio, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín, Juan Manuel Henriquez-Jurado, Luis Suso-Martí, Adrian Escriche-Escuder
{"title":"虚拟现实训练对中风患者上肢运动功能的孤立影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Iván José Fuentes-Abolafio, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín, Juan Manuel Henriquez-Jurado, Luis Suso-Martí, Adrian Escriche-Escuder","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To synthesize evidence on the effects of virtual reality (VR) as monotherapy on upper motor function in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and WOS were searched from inception to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were included (637 stroke patients, mean age 59.93 ± 6.52 years). The meta-analysis showed large effects sizes in VR interventions for upper extremity motor function and joint pain assessed with the Fugl-Meyer test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.03, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.49), being also superior when compared to a control group (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < 0.05, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.07). In contrast, these are not statistically significant when the analyses for motor function are done considering immersive or non-immersive VR. Non-immersive RV showed a large effect size on the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.20) and Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.35). RV also showed a medium effect size on the Action Research Arm Test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.61). These results were not significant when compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR as monotherapy improves upper limb motor function, being superior to other therapies in those functions assessed with the Fugl-Meyer scale. It is inconclusive if one VR modality is superior to another for improvements on upper limb motor function.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolated effects of virtual reality training on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Iván José Fuentes-Abolafio, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín, Juan Manuel Henriquez-Jurado, Luis Suso-Martí, Adrian Escriche-Escuder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To synthesize evidence on the effects of virtual reality (VR) as monotherapy on upper motor function in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and WOS were searched from inception to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were included (637 stroke patients, mean age 59.93 ± 6.52 years). The meta-analysis showed large effects sizes in VR interventions for upper extremity motor function and joint pain assessed with the Fugl-Meyer test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.03, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.49), being also superior when compared to a control group (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.68, <i>p</i> < 0.05, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.07). In contrast, these are not statistically significant when the analyses for motor function are done considering immersive or non-immersive VR. Non-immersive RV showed a large effect size on the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.20) and Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.35). RV also showed a medium effect size on the Action Research Arm Test (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.61). These results were not significant when compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR as monotherapy improves upper limb motor function, being superior to other therapies in those functions assessed with the Fugl-Meyer scale. It is inconclusive if one VR modality is superior to another for improvements on upper limb motor function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2527953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:综合研究虚拟现实(VR)单药治疗对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响。方法:检索PubMed、PEDro、CINAHL和WOS,检索时间为建站至2024年12月。结果:纳入19项研究(637例脑卒中患者,平均年龄59.93±6.52岁)。meta分析显示,通过Fugl-Meyer检验评估,VR干预对上肢运动功能和关节疼痛的影响很大(Cohen’s d = 1.03, p d = 1.49),与对照组相比也更优越(Cohen’s d = 0.68, p d = 1.07)。相比之下,当考虑沉浸式或非沉浸式VR进行运动功能分析时,这些数据在统计上并不显著。非沉浸式RV对运动活动日志使用量(Cohen’s d = 1.20)和运动活动日志质量(Cohen’s d = 1.35)的影响较大。RV在行动研究臂检验中也显示中等效应量(Cohen’s d = 0.61)。与对照组相比,这些结果并不显著。结论:VR作为单一疗法可改善上肢运动功能,在Fugl-Meyer量表评估的功能方面优于其他疗法。在改善上肢运动功能方面,一种VR方式是否优于另一种方式尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isolated effects of virtual reality training on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: To synthesize evidence on the effects of virtual reality (VR) as monotherapy on upper motor function in stroke patients.

Methods: PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and WOS were searched from inception to December 2024.

Results: Nineteen studies were included (637 stroke patients, mean age 59.93 ± 6.52 years). The meta-analysis showed large effects sizes in VR interventions for upper extremity motor function and joint pain assessed with the Fugl-Meyer test (Cohen's d = 1.03, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.49), being also superior when compared to a control group (Cohen's d = 0.68, p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 1.07). In contrast, these are not statistically significant when the analyses for motor function are done considering immersive or non-immersive VR. Non-immersive RV showed a large effect size on the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use (Cohen's d = 1.20) and Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement (Cohen's d = 1.35). RV also showed a medium effect size on the Action Research Arm Test (Cohen's d = 0.61). These results were not significant when compared to a control group.

Conclusion: VR as monotherapy improves upper limb motor function, being superior to other therapies in those functions assessed with the Fugl-Meyer scale. It is inconclusive if one VR modality is superior to another for improvements on upper limb motor function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信