Cramer J Kallem, Amit A Tevar, Tyler Bradley, Heather Jackson, Denise Haggerty, Hannah Cheng, Ritambhara Pathak, Yisi Wang, Maureen Carney, Shelby Gardner, Athrva Deshpande, Manisha Jhamb, Jennifer L Steel
{"title":"一项针对等待肾移植患者的综合阶梯协作护理干预(CARES-transplant)的II期随机对照试验。","authors":"Cramer J Kallem, Amit A Tevar, Tyler Bradley, Heather Jackson, Denise Haggerty, Hannah Cheng, Ritambhara Pathak, Yisi Wang, Maureen Carney, Shelby Gardner, Athrva Deshpande, Manisha Jhamb, Jennifer L Steel","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00574-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients awaiting kidney transplant carry a high symptom burden which has been associated with waitlist inactivation, mortality, and poorer post-transplant outcomes. However, few studies have tested the effects of symptom management interventions in this population. This Phase II study aimed to (1) test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention (CARES-Transplant) on patient-reported outcomes and unplanned healthcare utilization, and (2) explore treatment effects on family caregiver outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant versus standard of care (SC). Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 3-months including the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, and Rand Short Form-36. Caregivers were administered the CES-D, Perceived Stress Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline and 3-months. Patient unplanned health care utilization was assessed over the course of one-year post-randomization. Nineteen patients (mean age = 65 ± 6 years, 74% male, 90% White) and 8 caregivers (mean age = 61.3 ± 8.1 years, 100% female and white) were randomized. Reductions in pain intensity and interference were observed for CARES (- 0.2) while patients in the SC arm had increases in pain intensity and interference (+ 1.3, ES = 0.30). Similar trends were observed for fatigue (CARES = - 0.4 versus SC = - 7.7, ES = 0.41) and depressive symptoms (CARES = - 2.0 versus SC = + 2.33, ES = 0.56). Lower rates of transplant-related complications (CARES mean = 1 versus SC = 3), fewer emergency room visits (CARES = 1.0 versus SC = 2.67) and 90-day readmissions (CARES = 0% versus SC = 28.6%) were also observed. A moderate to large effect size was observed for changes on caregiver reported depressive symptoms (CARES = + 0.5 versus SC = + 3.3, ES = 0.55) and sleep quality (CARES = - 1.5 versus SC = + 0.07, ES = 0.34). The findings of this pilot study warrant a Phase III trial to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant.Clinical trials registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938351.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A phase II pilot randomized controlled trial of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention for patients awaiting kidney transplantation (CARES-transplant).\",\"authors\":\"Cramer J Kallem, Amit A Tevar, Tyler Bradley, Heather Jackson, Denise Haggerty, Hannah Cheng, Ritambhara Pathak, Yisi Wang, Maureen Carney, Shelby Gardner, Athrva Deshpande, Manisha Jhamb, Jennifer L Steel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10865-025-00574-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients awaiting kidney transplant carry a high symptom burden which has been associated with waitlist inactivation, mortality, and poorer post-transplant outcomes. However, few studies have tested the effects of symptom management interventions in this population. This Phase II study aimed to (1) test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention (CARES-Transplant) on patient-reported outcomes and unplanned healthcare utilization, and (2) explore treatment effects on family caregiver outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant versus standard of care (SC). Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 3-months including the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, and Rand Short Form-36. Caregivers were administered the CES-D, Perceived Stress Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline and 3-months. Patient unplanned health care utilization was assessed over the course of one-year post-randomization. Nineteen patients (mean age = 65 ± 6 years, 74% male, 90% White) and 8 caregivers (mean age = 61.3 ± 8.1 years, 100% female and white) were randomized. Reductions in pain intensity and interference were observed for CARES (- 0.2) while patients in the SC arm had increases in pain intensity and interference (+ 1.3, ES = 0.30). Similar trends were observed for fatigue (CARES = - 0.4 versus SC = - 7.7, ES = 0.41) and depressive symptoms (CARES = - 2.0 versus SC = + 2.33, ES = 0.56). Lower rates of transplant-related complications (CARES mean = 1 versus SC = 3), fewer emergency room visits (CARES = 1.0 versus SC = 2.67) and 90-day readmissions (CARES = 0% versus SC = 28.6%) were also observed. A moderate to large effect size was observed for changes on caregiver reported depressive symptoms (CARES = + 0.5 versus SC = + 3.3, ES = 0.55) and sleep quality (CARES = - 1.5 versus SC = + 0.07, ES = 0.34). The findings of this pilot study warrant a Phase III trial to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant.Clinical trials registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938351.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00574-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00574-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
等待肾移植的患者有很高的症状负担,这与等待名单失活、死亡率和移植后预后较差有关。然而,很少有研究测试症状管理干预对这一人群的影响。本II期研究旨在(1)检验一种整合的阶梯式协同护理干预(CARES-Transplant)对患者报告的结局和计划外医疗保健利用的可行性和初步疗效,以及(2)探索治疗对家庭照顾者结局的影响。该研究是一项随机对照试验,旨在测试cares移植与标准护理(SC)的疗效。患者在基线和3个月时完成了一系列问卷调查,包括流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、简短疼痛量表、慢性疾病治疗功能评估-疲劳和兰德简短表格-36。护理人员在基线和3个月时接受CES-D、感知压力量表和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数。在随机化后的一年中,评估患者计划外医疗保健利用情况。随机选取19例患者(平均年龄65±6岁,男性74%,白人90%)和8例护理人员(平均年龄61.3±8.1岁,女性和白人100%)。观察到护理组疼痛强度和干扰降低(- 0.2),而SC组患者疼痛强度和干扰增加(+ 1.3,ES = 0.30)。在疲劳(CARES = - 0.4 vs SC = - 7.7, ES = 0.41)和抑郁症状(CARES = - 2.0 vs SC = + 2.33, ES = 0.56)方面也观察到类似的趋势。移植相关并发症发生率较低(CARES平均= 1,SC = 3),急诊室就诊次数较少(CARES平均= 1.0,SC平均= 2.67),90天再入院率较低(CARES平均= 0%,SC平均= 28.6%)。观察到照顾者报告的抑郁症状(CARES = + 0.5 vs SC = + 3.3, ES = 0.55)和睡眠质量(CARES = - 1.5 vs SC = + 0.07, ES = 0.34)的变化具有中等到较大的效应量。这项初步研究的结果保证了III期试验,以测试CARES-Transplant的疗效。临床试验注册号ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938351。
A phase II pilot randomized controlled trial of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention for patients awaiting kidney transplantation (CARES-transplant).
Patients awaiting kidney transplant carry a high symptom burden which has been associated with waitlist inactivation, mortality, and poorer post-transplant outcomes. However, few studies have tested the effects of symptom management interventions in this population. This Phase II study aimed to (1) test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention (CARES-Transplant) on patient-reported outcomes and unplanned healthcare utilization, and (2) explore treatment effects on family caregiver outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant versus standard of care (SC). Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 3-months including the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, and Rand Short Form-36. Caregivers were administered the CES-D, Perceived Stress Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline and 3-months. Patient unplanned health care utilization was assessed over the course of one-year post-randomization. Nineteen patients (mean age = 65 ± 6 years, 74% male, 90% White) and 8 caregivers (mean age = 61.3 ± 8.1 years, 100% female and white) were randomized. Reductions in pain intensity and interference were observed for CARES (- 0.2) while patients in the SC arm had increases in pain intensity and interference (+ 1.3, ES = 0.30). Similar trends were observed for fatigue (CARES = - 0.4 versus SC = - 7.7, ES = 0.41) and depressive symptoms (CARES = - 2.0 versus SC = + 2.33, ES = 0.56). Lower rates of transplant-related complications (CARES mean = 1 versus SC = 3), fewer emergency room visits (CARES = 1.0 versus SC = 2.67) and 90-day readmissions (CARES = 0% versus SC = 28.6%) were also observed. A moderate to large effect size was observed for changes on caregiver reported depressive symptoms (CARES = + 0.5 versus SC = + 3.3, ES = 0.55) and sleep quality (CARES = - 1.5 versus SC = + 0.07, ES = 0.34). The findings of this pilot study warrant a Phase III trial to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant.Clinical trials registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938351.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders. Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.