{"title":"高效与传统良性肛肠手术室日的比较:一项队列研究。","authors":"Alessandro Leonardo Ricci, Sunil Patel, Kelly Brennan, Vanessa Wiseman, Tyler McKechnie, Ameer Farooq","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11956-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High efficiency (HE) operating rooms (OR) describe the intentional grouping of surgical cases according to case complexity, anesthetic, and nursing requirement. This approach has the potential to increase case volumes while protecting patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparison of a HE to a Traditional model on surgical efficiency metrics, patient outcomes, and total costs in benign anorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Canadian tertiary care academic center. Cases booked for the colorectal ambulatory surgical list during the pre-intervention (Traditional) phase spanning 2021-2022 were compared to the post-intervention (HE) phase implemented in 2023. The primary outcome of this study was surgical efficiency, defined as the number of cases completed per surgical list. Secondary outcomes included patient outcomes and hospital costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>257 patients were included in this study (Traditional 125 cases in 24 OR lists, HE 132 cases in 19 OR lists). Mean age (Traditional 52.2 vs. HE 49.1, p = 0.130) and male sex (57.6% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.899) were similar between groups. In the HE phase, more benign anorectal cases were completed per day (5.2 cases vs. 6.9cases, p < 0.001). The HE model saved 13 min (72.0 min vs 59.7 min, p < 0.001) per case. This included a decrease in surgical time (26.8 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.069), anesthetic time (20.2 min vs. 16.3 min, p < 0.001), and turnover time (22.6 min vs.18.5 min, p < 0.001). Perioperative outcomes, such as total PACU time (87.3 min vs 103.2 min, p = 0.080) and time to discharge (72.8 min vs 82.5 min, p = 0.262), were similar between phases. A HE model resulted in cost savings of approximately $368.13 per case ($1575 vs. $1207, p = 0.0013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a HE model resulted in more cases being completed, similar patient outcomes, and decreased costs of care. Adoption of this model should be considered for non-complex surgical procedures, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of high efficiency and traditional benign anorectal operating room days: a cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Leonardo Ricci, Sunil Patel, Kelly Brennan, Vanessa Wiseman, Tyler McKechnie, Ameer Farooq\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11956-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High efficiency (HE) operating rooms (OR) describe the intentional grouping of surgical cases according to case complexity, anesthetic, and nursing requirement. This approach has the potential to increase case volumes while protecting patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparison of a HE to a Traditional model on surgical efficiency metrics, patient outcomes, and total costs in benign anorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Canadian tertiary care academic center. Cases booked for the colorectal ambulatory surgical list during the pre-intervention (Traditional) phase spanning 2021-2022 were compared to the post-intervention (HE) phase implemented in 2023. The primary outcome of this study was surgical efficiency, defined as the number of cases completed per surgical list. Secondary outcomes included patient outcomes and hospital costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>257 patients were included in this study (Traditional 125 cases in 24 OR lists, HE 132 cases in 19 OR lists). Mean age (Traditional 52.2 vs. HE 49.1, p = 0.130) and male sex (57.6% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.899) were similar between groups. In the HE phase, more benign anorectal cases were completed per day (5.2 cases vs. 6.9cases, p < 0.001). The HE model saved 13 min (72.0 min vs 59.7 min, p < 0.001) per case. This included a decrease in surgical time (26.8 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.069), anesthetic time (20.2 min vs. 16.3 min, p < 0.001), and turnover time (22.6 min vs.18.5 min, p < 0.001). Perioperative outcomes, such as total PACU time (87.3 min vs 103.2 min, p = 0.080) and time to discharge (72.8 min vs 82.5 min, p = 0.262), were similar between phases. A HE model resulted in cost savings of approximately $368.13 per case ($1575 vs. $1207, p = 0.0013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a HE model resulted in more cases being completed, similar patient outcomes, and decreased costs of care. Adoption of this model should be considered for non-complex surgical procedures, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11956-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11956-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:高效手术室(HE)是指根据病例复杂性、麻醉和护理要求对手术病例进行有目的的分组。这种方法有可能在保护患者预后的同时增加病例量。目的:在良性肛肠手术中,HE与传统模式在手术效率指标、患者预后和总成本方面的比较。方法:这项单中心回顾性队列研究在加拿大三级医疗学术中心进行。将2021-2022年干预前(传统)阶段登记的结直肠门诊手术病例与2023年实施的干预后(HE)阶段进行比较。本研究的主要结果是手术效率,定义为每个手术清单完成的病例数。次要结局包括患者结局和医院费用。结果:本组共纳入257例患者(传统手术24例,125例;HE手术19例,132例)。两组患者的平均年龄(传统52.2比HE 49.1, p = 0.130)和男性(57.6%比56.8%,p = 0.899)相似。在HE阶段,每天完成的良性肛肠病例更多(5.2例vs. 6.9例)。结论:HE模型的实施导致完成的病例更多,患者预后相似,并且降低了护理成本。对于非复杂的外科手术,特别是在资源有限的情况下,应考虑采用这种模式。
A comparison of high efficiency and traditional benign anorectal operating room days: a cohort study.
Background: High efficiency (HE) operating rooms (OR) describe the intentional grouping of surgical cases according to case complexity, anesthetic, and nursing requirement. This approach has the potential to increase case volumes while protecting patient outcomes.
Objective: Comparison of a HE to a Traditional model on surgical efficiency metrics, patient outcomes, and total costs in benign anorectal surgery.
Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Canadian tertiary care academic center. Cases booked for the colorectal ambulatory surgical list during the pre-intervention (Traditional) phase spanning 2021-2022 were compared to the post-intervention (HE) phase implemented in 2023. The primary outcome of this study was surgical efficiency, defined as the number of cases completed per surgical list. Secondary outcomes included patient outcomes and hospital costs.
Results: 257 patients were included in this study (Traditional 125 cases in 24 OR lists, HE 132 cases in 19 OR lists). Mean age (Traditional 52.2 vs. HE 49.1, p = 0.130) and male sex (57.6% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.899) were similar between groups. In the HE phase, more benign anorectal cases were completed per day (5.2 cases vs. 6.9cases, p < 0.001). The HE model saved 13 min (72.0 min vs 59.7 min, p < 0.001) per case. This included a decrease in surgical time (26.8 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.069), anesthetic time (20.2 min vs. 16.3 min, p < 0.001), and turnover time (22.6 min vs.18.5 min, p < 0.001). Perioperative outcomes, such as total PACU time (87.3 min vs 103.2 min, p = 0.080) and time to discharge (72.8 min vs 82.5 min, p = 0.262), were similar between phases. A HE model resulted in cost savings of approximately $368.13 per case ($1575 vs. $1207, p = 0.0013).
Conclusion: Implementation of a HE model resulted in more cases being completed, similar patient outcomes, and decreased costs of care. Adoption of this model should be considered for non-complex surgical procedures, especially in resource-limited settings.
期刊介绍:
Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research.
Topics covered in the journal include:
-Surgical aspects of:
Interventional endoscopy,
Ultrasound,
Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology,
-Gastroenterologic surgery
-Thoracic surgery
-Traumatic surgery
-Orthopedic surgery
-Pediatric surgery