新型患者特异性、患者匹配的Bezier参数曲线棒平台对硅胸腰椎内固定融合模型近端接点生物力学的影响。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Franck Le Naveaux, Bahe Hachem, Sasha Vaziri, Varun Puvanesarajah, Saeed Sadrameli, David O Okonkwo, Thomas J Buell, Amit Jain, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Craig Forsthoefel, Reginald Fayssoux, Zachary J Tempel, Alekos A Theologis, Christopher S Ahuja
{"title":"新型患者特异性、患者匹配的Bezier参数曲线棒平台对硅胸腰椎内固定融合模型近端接点生物力学的影响。","authors":"Franck Le Naveaux, Bahe Hachem, Sasha Vaziri, Varun Puvanesarajah, Saeed Sadrameli, David O Okonkwo, Thomas J Buell, Amit Jain, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Craig Forsthoefel, Reginald Fayssoux, Zachary J Tempel, Alekos A Theologis, Christopher S Ahuja","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01146-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the biomechanical performance of a novel Bezier surface-smoothed transition rod, and to compare it to conventional and stepped rods, focusing on correction capability, spinal stabilization, instrumentation and spinal loading related to risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A spine finite element model with patient-specific 3D spinal geometry (severe sagittal imbalance from thoracolumbar kyphosis) was used. Surgical instrumentation with five rod types was simulated: (1) constant 6.0 mm diameter, (2) stepped 6.0 mm-5.0 mm diameter, (3) Bezier 6.0 mm-5.5 mm-5.0 mm diameter, (4) constant 5.5 mm diameter, and (5) Bezier 5.5 mm-5.0 mm-4.75 mm diameter. Gravitational forces and flexion movements were simulated to compare load transfer between the spine and instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All rod configurations achieved equivalent sagittal correction. Load distribution analysis showed that Bezier rods provided smoother load transitions and better offloading of proximal segments compared to constant diameter rods. The highest moment sustained by the segment adjacent to the instrumentation was observed with the constant 6 mm rod (9N.m), while the Bezier 5.5-5-4.75 mm rod showed the lowest moment (7.5Nm), indicating reduced stress of 16% on the upper adjacent vertebrae. Similarly, the Bezier rods were more effective in offloading pedicle screws up to 45% with respect to the stiffer rod construct, potentially reducing the risk of PJK.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The simulation analysis demonstrates Bezier rods offer promising biomechanical benefits particularly in load distribution and stress reduction at adjacent levels of long thoracolumbar instrumentation. Future efforts will focus on clinical validation and optimization of patient-specific designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a novel patient-specific, patient-matched Bezier parametric curve rod platform on proximal junction biomechanics in an in silico thoracolumbar instrumented fusion model.\",\"authors\":\"Franck Le Naveaux, Bahe Hachem, Sasha Vaziri, Varun Puvanesarajah, Saeed Sadrameli, David O Okonkwo, Thomas J Buell, Amit Jain, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Craig Forsthoefel, Reginald Fayssoux, Zachary J Tempel, Alekos A Theologis, Christopher S Ahuja\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-025-01146-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the biomechanical performance of a novel Bezier surface-smoothed transition rod, and to compare it to conventional and stepped rods, focusing on correction capability, spinal stabilization, instrumentation and spinal loading related to risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A spine finite element model with patient-specific 3D spinal geometry (severe sagittal imbalance from thoracolumbar kyphosis) was used. Surgical instrumentation with five rod types was simulated: (1) constant 6.0 mm diameter, (2) stepped 6.0 mm-5.0 mm diameter, (3) Bezier 6.0 mm-5.5 mm-5.0 mm diameter, (4) constant 5.5 mm diameter, and (5) Bezier 5.5 mm-5.0 mm-4.75 mm diameter. Gravitational forces and flexion movements were simulated to compare load transfer between the spine and instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All rod configurations achieved equivalent sagittal correction. Load distribution analysis showed that Bezier rods provided smoother load transitions and better offloading of proximal segments compared to constant diameter rods. The highest moment sustained by the segment adjacent to the instrumentation was observed with the constant 6 mm rod (9N.m), while the Bezier 5.5-5-4.75 mm rod showed the lowest moment (7.5Nm), indicating reduced stress of 16% on the upper adjacent vertebrae. Similarly, the Bezier rods were more effective in offloading pedicle screws up to 45% with respect to the stiffer rod construct, potentially reducing the risk of PJK.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The simulation analysis demonstrates Bezier rods offer promising biomechanical benefits particularly in load distribution and stress reduction at adjacent levels of long thoracolumbar instrumentation. Future efforts will focus on clinical validation and optimization of patient-specific designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01146-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01146-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估一种新型Bezier表面光滑过渡棒的生物力学性能,并将其与传统和踏步棒进行比较,重点关注矫正能力、脊柱稳定、内固定和脊柱负荷与近端关节后凸(PJK)风险的关系。方法:采用具有患者特异性三维脊柱几何形状(胸腰椎后凸引起的严重矢状面不平衡)的脊柱有限元模型。模拟五种类型的手术器械:(1)恒定6.0 mm直径,(2)阶梯6.0 mm-5.0 mm直径,(3)Bezier 6.0 mm-5.5 mm-5.0 mm直径,(4)恒定5.5 mm直径,(5)Bezier 5.5 mm-5.0 mm-4.75 mm直径。模拟重力和屈曲运动来比较脊柱和内固定之间的载荷传递。结果:所有棒的配置都达到了相当的矢状面矫正。载荷分布分析表明,与恒径杆相比,Bezier杆提供了更平滑的载荷转换和更好的近端卸载。固定的6mm棒(9N.m)观察到与器械相邻的节段承受的最大力矩,而Bezier 5.5-5-4.75 mm棒显示的最小力矩(7.5Nm),表明相邻上部椎骨的应力减少了16%。同样,与较硬棒结构相比,Bezier棒更有效地卸载了45%的椎弓根螺钉,潜在地降低了PJK的风险。结论:模拟分析表明,贝塞尔棒具有良好的生物力学优势,特别是在长胸腰椎内固定相邻水平的负荷分布和应力减少方面。未来的工作将集中在临床验证和优化患者特异性设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a novel patient-specific, patient-matched Bezier parametric curve rod platform on proximal junction biomechanics in an in silico thoracolumbar instrumented fusion model.

Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical performance of a novel Bezier surface-smoothed transition rod, and to compare it to conventional and stepped rods, focusing on correction capability, spinal stabilization, instrumentation and spinal loading related to risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

Methods: A spine finite element model with patient-specific 3D spinal geometry (severe sagittal imbalance from thoracolumbar kyphosis) was used. Surgical instrumentation with five rod types was simulated: (1) constant 6.0 mm diameter, (2) stepped 6.0 mm-5.0 mm diameter, (3) Bezier 6.0 mm-5.5 mm-5.0 mm diameter, (4) constant 5.5 mm diameter, and (5) Bezier 5.5 mm-5.0 mm-4.75 mm diameter. Gravitational forces and flexion movements were simulated to compare load transfer between the spine and instrumentation.

Results: All rod configurations achieved equivalent sagittal correction. Load distribution analysis showed that Bezier rods provided smoother load transitions and better offloading of proximal segments compared to constant diameter rods. The highest moment sustained by the segment adjacent to the instrumentation was observed with the constant 6 mm rod (9N.m), while the Bezier 5.5-5-4.75 mm rod showed the lowest moment (7.5Nm), indicating reduced stress of 16% on the upper adjacent vertebrae. Similarly, the Bezier rods were more effective in offloading pedicle screws up to 45% with respect to the stiffer rod construct, potentially reducing the risk of PJK.

Conclusions: The simulation analysis demonstrates Bezier rods offer promising biomechanical benefits particularly in load distribution and stress reduction at adjacent levels of long thoracolumbar instrumentation. Future efforts will focus on clinical validation and optimization of patient-specific designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信