沙特阿拉伯妇产科和麻醉学专业人员对局部麻醉剂使用和毒性的认识和实践。

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_557_24
Jumana Baaj, Maysoon Alhaizan, Reem Alsafar, Abdullah Bin Muammar, Mansor Aldaijy, Rakan Alfaifi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯妇产科和麻醉学专业人员对局部麻醉剂使用和毒性的认识和实践。","authors":"Jumana Baaj, Maysoon Alhaizan, Reem Alsafar, Abdullah Bin Muammar, Mansor Aldaijy, Rakan Alfaifi","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_557_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly used in obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN); however, inappropriate administration can cause local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), a life-threatening condition. For safe medical practice, healthcare providers should carefully follow the guidelines for administering LAs for early identification and proper management of LAST when it occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide study used a 36-item self-administered questionnaire administered to healthcare professionals in OB-GYN and anesthesiology. The survey assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of commonly used LA agents, their appropriate dosage, and awareness of LAST's management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A study of 391 Saudi healthcare professionals, between OB-GYN (51.2%) and anesthesiology (48.8%), reported greater engagement in anesthetic training and usage among anesthesiologists (88% trained, 58.1% daily use) than among OB-GYNs (38.5% trained, 30.5% daily use). OB-GYNs most commonly performed perineal tear repairs (88.5%), whereas anesthesiologists mainly performed paracervical blocks (89.5%). Lidocaine was the preferred local anesthetic for OB-GYNs at 93.5%, with anesthesiologists also favoring lidocaine but showing a higher use of bupivacaine (75.4%). Furthermore, the knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores of OB-GYN participants were significantly lower scores in all parameters compared to the anesthesiology participants (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals in OB-GYN lack adequate knowledge of the safe and effective use of LA agents. Their knowledge must be increased through education to ensure safe practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 3","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awareness and practices regarding local anesthetic usage and toxicity among OB-GYN and anesthesiology professionals in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Jumana Baaj, Maysoon Alhaizan, Reem Alsafar, Abdullah Bin Muammar, Mansor Aldaijy, Rakan Alfaifi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_557_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly used in obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN); however, inappropriate administration can cause local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), a life-threatening condition. For safe medical practice, healthcare providers should carefully follow the guidelines for administering LAs for early identification and proper management of LAST when it occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide study used a 36-item self-administered questionnaire administered to healthcare professionals in OB-GYN and anesthesiology. The survey assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of commonly used LA agents, their appropriate dosage, and awareness of LAST's management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A study of 391 Saudi healthcare professionals, between OB-GYN (51.2%) and anesthesiology (48.8%), reported greater engagement in anesthetic training and usage among anesthesiologists (88% trained, 58.1% daily use) than among OB-GYNs (38.5% trained, 30.5% daily use). OB-GYNs most commonly performed perineal tear repairs (88.5%), whereas anesthesiologists mainly performed paracervical blocks (89.5%). Lidocaine was the preferred local anesthetic for OB-GYNs at 93.5%, with anesthesiologists also favoring lidocaine but showing a higher use of bupivacaine (75.4%). Furthermore, the knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores of OB-GYN participants were significantly lower scores in all parameters compared to the anesthesiology participants (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals in OB-GYN lack adequate knowledge of the safe and effective use of LA agents. Their knowledge must be increased through education to ensure safe practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"277-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_557_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_557_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局麻药(LAs)在妇产科(OB-GYN)常用;然而,不适当的给药可引起局部麻醉全身毒性(LAST),这是一种危及生命的疾病。为了安全的医疗实践,医疗保健提供者应仔细遵循管理LAs的指导方针,以便在发生LAST时早期识别和适当管理。方法:这项全国性的研究采用36项自我填写的问卷,对妇产科和麻醉科的医疗保健专业人员进行调查。该调查评估了常用的LA药物的知识、态度和做法、适当的剂量以及对LAST管理的认识。结果:一项对391名沙特卫生保健专业人员的研究显示,在妇产科(51.2%)和麻醉科(48.8%)之间,麻醉医师(88%接受过培训,58.1%每天使用)比妇产科(38.5%接受过培训,30.5%每天使用)更积极地参与麻醉培训和使用。妇产科医生最常进行会阴撕裂修复(88.5%),而麻醉师主要进行宫颈旁阻滞(89.5%)。93.5%的妇产科医生偏爱利多卡因作为局部麻醉剂,麻醉医生也偏爱利多卡因,但布比卡因的使用率更高(75.4%)。此外,妇产科参与者的知识、态度和实践得分均显著低于麻醉科参与者(P < 0.001)。结论:妇产科的卫生保健专业人员缺乏对LA药物安全有效使用的足够知识。必须通过教育来增加他们的知识,以确保安全做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Awareness and practices regarding local anesthetic usage and toxicity among OB-GYN and anesthesiology professionals in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly used in obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN); however, inappropriate administration can cause local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), a life-threatening condition. For safe medical practice, healthcare providers should carefully follow the guidelines for administering LAs for early identification and proper management of LAST when it occurs.

Methods: This nationwide study used a 36-item self-administered questionnaire administered to healthcare professionals in OB-GYN and anesthesiology. The survey assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of commonly used LA agents, their appropriate dosage, and awareness of LAST's management.

Results: A study of 391 Saudi healthcare professionals, between OB-GYN (51.2%) and anesthesiology (48.8%), reported greater engagement in anesthetic training and usage among anesthesiologists (88% trained, 58.1% daily use) than among OB-GYNs (38.5% trained, 30.5% daily use). OB-GYNs most commonly performed perineal tear repairs (88.5%), whereas anesthesiologists mainly performed paracervical blocks (89.5%). Lidocaine was the preferred local anesthetic for OB-GYNs at 93.5%, with anesthesiologists also favoring lidocaine but showing a higher use of bupivacaine (75.4%). Furthermore, the knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores of OB-GYN participants were significantly lower scores in all parameters compared to the anesthesiology participants (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals in OB-GYN lack adequate knowledge of the safe and effective use of LA agents. Their knowledge must be increased through education to ensure safe practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信