{"title":"行动呼吁:通过统一的验证和接受框架推进监管毒理学的新方法方法(NAMs)。","authors":"G. Ouedraogo , N. Alépée , B. Tan , C.S. Roper","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition from traditional animal testing to human-relevant New Approach Methods (NAMs) in regulatory toxicology faces a significant challenge: a lack of standardized validation and acceptance criteria. This review analyses the limitations of animal test reproducibility and highlights the growing body of evidence supporting the improved reliability and relevance of NAMs for predicting human toxicity. Successful case studies of NAMs implementation across diverse industries are examined and existing regulatory perspectives and initiatives are critically evaluated. This analysis reveals a pressing need for a unified, cross-industry approach to NAMs validation, grounded in measurable quality standards and standardisation. A framework is proposed based on clearly defined standards, standardized protocols, and transparent data sharing to accelerate the integration of NAMs into regulatory decision-making, ultimately benefiting human health, animal welfare, and scientific progress. All stakeholders are urged to actively participate in this initiative by contributing their expertise, sharing data and insights, and collaborating on the development and implementation of this crucial use of NAMs in regulatory toxicology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105904"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A call to action: Advancing new approach methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory toxicology through a unified framework for validation and acceptance\",\"authors\":\"G. Ouedraogo , N. Alépée , B. Tan , C.S. Roper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The transition from traditional animal testing to human-relevant New Approach Methods (NAMs) in regulatory toxicology faces a significant challenge: a lack of standardized validation and acceptance criteria. This review analyses the limitations of animal test reproducibility and highlights the growing body of evidence supporting the improved reliability and relevance of NAMs for predicting human toxicity. Successful case studies of NAMs implementation across diverse industries are examined and existing regulatory perspectives and initiatives are critically evaluated. This analysis reveals a pressing need for a unified, cross-industry approach to NAMs validation, grounded in measurable quality standards and standardisation. A framework is proposed based on clearly defined standards, standardized protocols, and transparent data sharing to accelerate the integration of NAMs into regulatory decision-making, ultimately benefiting human health, animal welfare, and scientific progress. All stakeholders are urged to actively participate in this initiative by contributing their expertise, sharing data and insights, and collaborating on the development and implementation of this crucial use of NAMs in regulatory toxicology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A call to action: Advancing new approach methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory toxicology through a unified framework for validation and acceptance
The transition from traditional animal testing to human-relevant New Approach Methods (NAMs) in regulatory toxicology faces a significant challenge: a lack of standardized validation and acceptance criteria. This review analyses the limitations of animal test reproducibility and highlights the growing body of evidence supporting the improved reliability and relevance of NAMs for predicting human toxicity. Successful case studies of NAMs implementation across diverse industries are examined and existing regulatory perspectives and initiatives are critically evaluated. This analysis reveals a pressing need for a unified, cross-industry approach to NAMs validation, grounded in measurable quality standards and standardisation. A framework is proposed based on clearly defined standards, standardized protocols, and transparent data sharing to accelerate the integration of NAMs into regulatory decision-making, ultimately benefiting human health, animal welfare, and scientific progress. All stakeholders are urged to actively participate in this initiative by contributing their expertise, sharing data and insights, and collaborating on the development and implementation of this crucial use of NAMs in regulatory toxicology.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)