监测长期护理机构护理的质量指标:范围审查。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gillian E Caughey, Miia Rahja, Rangika Fernando, Maria C Inacio
{"title":"监测长期护理机构护理的质量指标:范围审查。","authors":"Gillian E Caughey, Miia Rahja, Rangika Fernando, Maria C Inacio","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and synthesize quality indicators (QIs) used to routinely monitor and assess the quality and safety of care received by residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping literature review.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Older people ≥65 years of age residing in LTCFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic and gray literature searches were done to identify publicly available QIs, routinely used at the population level and reported since 2012. Synthesis by domains, QI type (structure, process, and outcome), and dimension of quality (efficiency, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, equity, and safety). The data used to develop the QIs, risk adjustments, and population- and reporting-related characteristics were also summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 327 QIs from 18 programs across 13 countries were identified. Of the identified QIs, 68.2% (n = 223) were outcome QIs, 30.0% (n = 98) were process QIs, and 1.8% (n = 6) were structure QIs. Almost 80% (79.2%; n = 259) of the QIs were related to the dimensions of safety and effectiveness. The most common domains across the 18 QI programs included falls/fractures/injuries, medication-related, and pressure injury, with 14 programs (77.8%) covering each of these areas. Standardized clinical data (n = 235) was the most common data source used for QI estimation. Public reporting was available at various levels ranging from the national to facility level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>International QIs to monitor and evaluate the quality of care in LTCFs focus on safe and effective care, essential in supporting residents to maintain well-being and quality of life. The findings from this review highlight the need for wider adoption of a comprehensive holistic suite of QIs to support person-centered care, reflective of all dimensions of care quality including equity, to drive improvements in LTCFs worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Indicators to Monitor Care in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Gillian E Caughey, Miia Rahja, Rangika Fernando, Maria C Inacio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and synthesize quality indicators (QIs) used to routinely monitor and assess the quality and safety of care received by residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping literature review.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Older people ≥65 years of age residing in LTCFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic and gray literature searches were done to identify publicly available QIs, routinely used at the population level and reported since 2012. Synthesis by domains, QI type (structure, process, and outcome), and dimension of quality (efficiency, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, equity, and safety). The data used to develop the QIs, risk adjustments, and population- and reporting-related characteristics were also summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 327 QIs from 18 programs across 13 countries were identified. Of the identified QIs, 68.2% (n = 223) were outcome QIs, 30.0% (n = 98) were process QIs, and 1.8% (n = 6) were structure QIs. Almost 80% (79.2%; n = 259) of the QIs were related to the dimensions of safety and effectiveness. The most common domains across the 18 QI programs included falls/fractures/injuries, medication-related, and pressure injury, with 14 programs (77.8%) covering each of these areas. Standardized clinical data (n = 235) was the most common data source used for QI estimation. Public reporting was available at various levels ranging from the national to facility level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>International QIs to monitor and evaluate the quality of care in LTCFs focus on safe and effective care, essential in supporting residents to maintain well-being and quality of life. The findings from this review highlight the need for wider adoption of a comprehensive holistic suite of QIs to support person-centered care, reflective of all dimensions of care quality including equity, to drive improvements in LTCFs worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:识别并综合用于常规监测和评估长期护理机构(ltcf)居民护理质量和安全的质量指标(QIs)。设计:范围文献综述。环境和参与者:≥65岁居住在ltcf的老年人。方法:进行学术和灰色文献检索,以确定公开可用的QIs,这些QIs通常在人群水平上使用,并自2012年以来报告。按领域、QI类型(结构、过程和结果)和质量维度(效率、有效性、以患者为中心、及时性、公平性和安全性)进行综合。还总结了用于制定质量指标、风险调整以及人口和报告相关特征的数据。结果:从13个国家的18个项目中共确定了327个质量指标。在已确定的QIs中,68.2% (n = 223)为结局性QIs, 30.0% (n = 98)为过程性QIs, 1.8% (n = 6)为结构性QIs。近80% (79.2%;n = 259)的QIs与安全性和有效性维度相关。18个QI项目中最常见的领域包括跌倒/骨折/损伤、药物相关和压力损伤,其中14个项目(77.8%)涵盖了这些领域。标准化临床数据(n = 235)是QI评估最常用的数据来源。从国家一级到设施一级都有公开报告。结论和意义:监测和评估ltcf护理质量的国际质量指标侧重于安全有效的护理,这对于支持居民保持健康和生活质量至关重要。本综述的结果强调需要更广泛地采用一套全面的整体质量指标,以支持以人为本的护理,反映护理质量的各个方面,包括公平性,以推动全球ltcf的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Indicators to Monitor Care in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review.

Objective: To identify and synthesize quality indicators (QIs) used to routinely monitor and assess the quality and safety of care received by residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).

Design: A scoping literature review.

Setting and participants: Older people ≥65 years of age residing in LTCFs.

Methods: Academic and gray literature searches were done to identify publicly available QIs, routinely used at the population level and reported since 2012. Synthesis by domains, QI type (structure, process, and outcome), and dimension of quality (efficiency, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, equity, and safety). The data used to develop the QIs, risk adjustments, and population- and reporting-related characteristics were also summarized.

Results: A total of 327 QIs from 18 programs across 13 countries were identified. Of the identified QIs, 68.2% (n = 223) were outcome QIs, 30.0% (n = 98) were process QIs, and 1.8% (n = 6) were structure QIs. Almost 80% (79.2%; n = 259) of the QIs were related to the dimensions of safety and effectiveness. The most common domains across the 18 QI programs included falls/fractures/injuries, medication-related, and pressure injury, with 14 programs (77.8%) covering each of these areas. Standardized clinical data (n = 235) was the most common data source used for QI estimation. Public reporting was available at various levels ranging from the national to facility level.

Conclusions and implications: International QIs to monitor and evaluate the quality of care in LTCFs focus on safe and effective care, essential in supporting residents to maintain well-being and quality of life. The findings from this review highlight the need for wider adoption of a comprehensive holistic suite of QIs to support person-centered care, reflective of all dimensions of care quality including equity, to drive improvements in LTCFs worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信