Gillian E Caughey, Miia Rahja, Rangika Fernando, Maria C Inacio
{"title":"监测长期护理机构护理的质量指标:范围审查。","authors":"Gillian E Caughey, Miia Rahja, Rangika Fernando, Maria C Inacio","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and synthesize quality indicators (QIs) used to routinely monitor and assess the quality and safety of care received by residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping literature review.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Older people ≥65 years of age residing in LTCFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic and gray literature searches were done to identify publicly available QIs, routinely used at the population level and reported since 2012. Synthesis by domains, QI type (structure, process, and outcome), and dimension of quality (efficiency, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, equity, and safety). The data used to develop the QIs, risk adjustments, and population- and reporting-related characteristics were also summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 327 QIs from 18 programs across 13 countries were identified. Of the identified QIs, 68.2% (n = 223) were outcome QIs, 30.0% (n = 98) were process QIs, and 1.8% (n = 6) were structure QIs. Almost 80% (79.2%; n = 259) of the QIs were related to the dimensions of safety and effectiveness. The most common domains across the 18 QI programs included falls/fractures/injuries, medication-related, and pressure injury, with 14 programs (77.8%) covering each of these areas. Standardized clinical data (n = 235) was the most common data source used for QI estimation. Public reporting was available at various levels ranging from the national to facility level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>International QIs to monitor and evaluate the quality of care in LTCFs focus on safe and effective care, essential in supporting residents to maintain well-being and quality of life. The findings from this review highlight the need for wider adoption of a comprehensive holistic suite of QIs to support person-centered care, reflective of all dimensions of care quality including equity, to drive improvements in LTCFs worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Indicators to Monitor Care in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Gillian E Caughey, Miia Rahja, Rangika Fernando, Maria C Inacio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and synthesize quality indicators (QIs) used to routinely monitor and assess the quality and safety of care received by residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping literature review.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Older people ≥65 years of age residing in LTCFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic and gray literature searches were done to identify publicly available QIs, routinely used at the population level and reported since 2012. Synthesis by domains, QI type (structure, process, and outcome), and dimension of quality (efficiency, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, equity, and safety). The data used to develop the QIs, risk adjustments, and population- and reporting-related characteristics were also summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 327 QIs from 18 programs across 13 countries were identified. Of the identified QIs, 68.2% (n = 223) were outcome QIs, 30.0% (n = 98) were process QIs, and 1.8% (n = 6) were structure QIs. Almost 80% (79.2%; n = 259) of the QIs were related to the dimensions of safety and effectiveness. The most common domains across the 18 QI programs included falls/fractures/injuries, medication-related, and pressure injury, with 14 programs (77.8%) covering each of these areas. Standardized clinical data (n = 235) was the most common data source used for QI estimation. Public reporting was available at various levels ranging from the national to facility level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>International QIs to monitor and evaluate the quality of care in LTCFs focus on safe and effective care, essential in supporting residents to maintain well-being and quality of life. The findings from this review highlight the need for wider adoption of a comprehensive holistic suite of QIs to support person-centered care, reflective of all dimensions of care quality including equity, to drive improvements in LTCFs worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality Indicators to Monitor Care in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review.
Objective: To identify and synthesize quality indicators (QIs) used to routinely monitor and assess the quality and safety of care received by residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).
Design: A scoping literature review.
Setting and participants: Older people ≥65 years of age residing in LTCFs.
Methods: Academic and gray literature searches were done to identify publicly available QIs, routinely used at the population level and reported since 2012. Synthesis by domains, QI type (structure, process, and outcome), and dimension of quality (efficiency, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, equity, and safety). The data used to develop the QIs, risk adjustments, and population- and reporting-related characteristics were also summarized.
Results: A total of 327 QIs from 18 programs across 13 countries were identified. Of the identified QIs, 68.2% (n = 223) were outcome QIs, 30.0% (n = 98) were process QIs, and 1.8% (n = 6) were structure QIs. Almost 80% (79.2%; n = 259) of the QIs were related to the dimensions of safety and effectiveness. The most common domains across the 18 QI programs included falls/fractures/injuries, medication-related, and pressure injury, with 14 programs (77.8%) covering each of these areas. Standardized clinical data (n = 235) was the most common data source used for QI estimation. Public reporting was available at various levels ranging from the national to facility level.
Conclusions and implications: International QIs to monitor and evaluate the quality of care in LTCFs focus on safe and effective care, essential in supporting residents to maintain well-being and quality of life. The findings from this review highlight the need for wider adoption of a comprehensive holistic suite of QIs to support person-centered care, reflective of all dimensions of care quality including equity, to drive improvements in LTCFs worldwide.
期刊介绍:
JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates.
The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality