Rosiered Brownson-Smith, Ananya Ananthakrishnan, Oksana Hagen, Cen Cong, Amir Aly, Ray B Jones, Edward Meinert
{"title":"老年人社会关怀的对话系统:范围审查方案。","authors":"Rosiered Brownson-Smith, Ananya Ananthakrishnan, Oksana Hagen, Cen Cong, Amir Aly, Ray B Jones, Edward Meinert","doi":"10.2196/72310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social care systems worldwide face increasing demographic and financial pressures. This necessitates exploring innovative technological solutions to enhance service delivery without substantially increasing costs. Conversational interfaces, including interactive voice response, chatbots, and voice assistants, have gained traction as a means to improve accessibility and efficiency in social care. The rapid development of large language models such as ChatGPT has further accelerated interest in conversational artificial intelligence (AI). These technologies can offer intuitive interactions, particularly for individuals with limited digital literacy. However, their real-world impact, usability, and ethical considerations in social care remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to synthesize existing literature on the implementation, evaluation, and impact of conversational AI systems within social care settings for older adults. The review will identify best practices, current gaps, and future directions for research and implementation. Key research questions include the following: how are conversational systems implemented on a technical level, and how do older adults and their support systems use them in a social care context? What methods are used to evaluate acceptability, usability, and the impact of broad well-being in the context of older adults' social care? and What are conversational technologies' acceptability, usability, and well-being impact in the context of older adults' social care?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) and Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) frameworks. A systematic search will be conducted across five databases (IEEE, Web of Science, PubMed, ACM, and Scopus) for English-language articles published from 2019 onward. Studies will be included if they empirically examine conversational systems' implementation, evaluation, or impact for older adults (aged ≥55 years) within a social care context. Two independent reviewers will screen articles and extract data. A descriptive analysis will then categorize findings across key domains such as accessibility, usability, ethical considerations, and well-being outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results will be included in the scoping review, which began in March 2025. The analysis is underway and is expected to be completed and submitted for publication by September 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review will provide an overview of the role of conversational AI in social care, highlighting both opportunities and challenges in implementation. By synthesizing existing research, the review will inform future developments in the use of conversational agents to improve social inclusion, engagement, and well-being among older adults.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>PRR1-10.2196/72310.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e72310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversational Systems for Social Care in Older Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rosiered Brownson-Smith, Ananya Ananthakrishnan, Oksana Hagen, Cen Cong, Amir Aly, Ray B Jones, Edward Meinert\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/72310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social care systems worldwide face increasing demographic and financial pressures. This necessitates exploring innovative technological solutions to enhance service delivery without substantially increasing costs. Conversational interfaces, including interactive voice response, chatbots, and voice assistants, have gained traction as a means to improve accessibility and efficiency in social care. The rapid development of large language models such as ChatGPT has further accelerated interest in conversational artificial intelligence (AI). These technologies can offer intuitive interactions, particularly for individuals with limited digital literacy. However, their real-world impact, usability, and ethical considerations in social care remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to synthesize existing literature on the implementation, evaluation, and impact of conversational AI systems within social care settings for older adults. The review will identify best practices, current gaps, and future directions for research and implementation. Key research questions include the following: how are conversational systems implemented on a technical level, and how do older adults and their support systems use them in a social care context? What methods are used to evaluate acceptability, usability, and the impact of broad well-being in the context of older adults' social care? and What are conversational technologies' acceptability, usability, and well-being impact in the context of older adults' social care?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) and Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) frameworks. A systematic search will be conducted across five databases (IEEE, Web of Science, PubMed, ACM, and Scopus) for English-language articles published from 2019 onward. Studies will be included if they empirically examine conversational systems' implementation, evaluation, or impact for older adults (aged ≥55 years) within a social care context. Two independent reviewers will screen articles and extract data. A descriptive analysis will then categorize findings across key domains such as accessibility, usability, ethical considerations, and well-being outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results will be included in the scoping review, which began in March 2025. The analysis is underway and is expected to be completed and submitted for publication by September 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review will provide an overview of the role of conversational AI in social care, highlighting both opportunities and challenges in implementation. By synthesizing existing research, the review will inform future developments in the use of conversational agents to improve social inclusion, engagement, and well-being among older adults.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>PRR1-10.2196/72310.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"e72310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/72310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:世界各地的社会保健系统面临越来越大的人口和财政压力。这就需要探索创新的技术解决方案,在不大幅增加成本的情况下加强服务的提供。会话界面,包括交互式语音响应、聊天机器人和语音助手,已经成为提高社会关怀可及性和效率的一种手段。ChatGPT等大型语言模型的快速发展进一步加速了人们对会话人工智能(AI)的兴趣。这些技术可以提供直观的交互,特别是对于数字素养有限的个人。然而,它们在现实世界中的影响、可用性和社会关怀中的伦理考虑仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本综述旨在综合现有的关于会话人工智能系统在老年人社会护理环境中的实施、评估和影响的文献。审查将确定最佳做法、目前的差距以及研究和实施的未来方向。关键的研究问题包括:对话系统如何在技术层面上实现,老年人及其支持系统如何在社会护理环境中使用它们? 在老年人社会关怀的背景下,用什么方法来评估可接受性、可用性和广泛福祉的影响?对话技术在老年人社会关怀中的可接受性、可用性和幸福感影响是什么?方法:本综述将遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)和人口、概念和背景(PCC)框架。将在五个数据库(IEEE、Web of Science、PubMed、ACM和Scopus)中进行系统搜索,以获取2019年以后发表的英语文章。如果研究在社会护理背景下对老年人(年龄≥55岁)会话系统的实施、评估或影响进行实证检验,则将纳入研究。两名独立审稿人将筛选文章并提取数据。然后,描述性分析将跨关键领域(如可访问性、可用性、道德考虑和福祉结果)对结果进行分类。结果:结果将包括在2025年3月开始的范围审查中。分析正在进行中,预计将于2025年9月完成并提交出版。结论:这一范围审查将概述对话式人工智能在社会关怀中的作用,强调实施中的机遇和挑战。通过综合现有研究,本综述将为今后使用会话代理来改善老年人的社会包容、参与和福祉提供信息。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): PRR1-10.2196/72310。
Conversational Systems for Social Care in Older Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
Background: Social care systems worldwide face increasing demographic and financial pressures. This necessitates exploring innovative technological solutions to enhance service delivery without substantially increasing costs. Conversational interfaces, including interactive voice response, chatbots, and voice assistants, have gained traction as a means to improve accessibility and efficiency in social care. The rapid development of large language models such as ChatGPT has further accelerated interest in conversational artificial intelligence (AI). These technologies can offer intuitive interactions, particularly for individuals with limited digital literacy. However, their real-world impact, usability, and ethical considerations in social care remain underexplored.
Objective: This scoping review aims to synthesize existing literature on the implementation, evaluation, and impact of conversational AI systems within social care settings for older adults. The review will identify best practices, current gaps, and future directions for research and implementation. Key research questions include the following: how are conversational systems implemented on a technical level, and how do older adults and their support systems use them in a social care context? What methods are used to evaluate acceptability, usability, and the impact of broad well-being in the context of older adults' social care? and What are conversational technologies' acceptability, usability, and well-being impact in the context of older adults' social care?
Methods: The review will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) and Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) frameworks. A systematic search will be conducted across five databases (IEEE, Web of Science, PubMed, ACM, and Scopus) for English-language articles published from 2019 onward. Studies will be included if they empirically examine conversational systems' implementation, evaluation, or impact for older adults (aged ≥55 years) within a social care context. Two independent reviewers will screen articles and extract data. A descriptive analysis will then categorize findings across key domains such as accessibility, usability, ethical considerations, and well-being outcomes.
Results: The results will be included in the scoping review, which began in March 2025. The analysis is underway and is expected to be completed and submitted for publication by September 2025.
Conclusions: This scoping review will provide an overview of the role of conversational AI in social care, highlighting both opportunities and challenges in implementation. By synthesizing existing research, the review will inform future developments in the use of conversational agents to improve social inclusion, engagement, and well-being among older adults.
International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/72310.