确定荷兰教育和医疗保健之间的关键复杂关系,以促进未来的大流行管理。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sophie Hadjisotiriou, Jannie Coenen, Etiënne A J A Rouwette, Vittorio Nespeca, Tom H Oreel, Vincent A W J Marchau, Vítor V Vasconcelos, Rick Quax, Heiman F L Wertheim, Marcel G M Olde Rikkert, Hubert P L M Korzilius
{"title":"确定荷兰教育和医疗保健之间的关键复杂关系,以促进未来的大流行管理。","authors":"Sophie Hadjisotiriou, Jannie Coenen, Etiënne A J A Rouwette, Vittorio Nespeca, Tom H Oreel, Vincent A W J Marchau, Vítor V Vasconcelos, Rick Quax, Heiman F L Wertheim, Marcel G M Olde Rikkert, Hubert P L M Korzilius","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01359-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and subsequent policies in the Netherlands extended beyond healthcare, impacting other societal systems such as education. This study aims to conceptualize a coupled education-healthcare system during a pandemic and identify key variables and relations that affect the accessibility of both systems. This is essential to address the interconnected nature of pandemic policymaking and design policies that account for possible unintended consequences that interventions in healthcare may have on education and vice versa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group model building and in-depth interviews with actors from healthcare and education were used to develop a coupled causal loop diagram of healthcare and education accessibility in the Netherlands during a pandemic. The causal loop diagram is analysed with cross-impact analysis to identify key leverage points, monitoring variables, feedback loops and relations between healthcare and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six causal relations were identified between healthcare and education, indicating a relevant impact of healthcare on education during pandemics. Cross-impact analysis identified 24 leverage points, of which 10 were in healthcare, 11 in education and 4 in the contextual environment. During the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, healthcare utilized all these leverage points, education utilized six and two were used not pertaining to healthcare or education but the contextual environment. Leverage points included the availability and wellbeing of personnel, number of patients, progress of pupils/students and resources. Seven monitoring variables included the availability of personnel, resources in education and progress of pupils/students, and were utilized in healthcare and education during the pandemic. Four feedback loops were found, of which three are reinforcing. One large balancing feedback loop is situated between the healthcare and education system, indicating mutual dependency to maintain staff for the accessibility of healthcare and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Group model building, in-depth interviews and cross-impact analysis identified key variables, causal relations and feedback loops illustrating the coupled nature of healthcare and education during pandemics. This highlights the need for integrated policymaking that addresses and considers coupled systems to ensure accessibility to both healthcare and education. The finalized model can serve as a tool to support such integrated policymaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying key complex relations between education and healthcare in the Netherlands for future pandemic management.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Hadjisotiriou, Jannie Coenen, Etiënne A J A Rouwette, Vittorio Nespeca, Tom H Oreel, Vincent A W J Marchau, Vítor V Vasconcelos, Rick Quax, Heiman F L Wertheim, Marcel G M Olde Rikkert, Hubert P L M Korzilius\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-025-01359-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and subsequent policies in the Netherlands extended beyond healthcare, impacting other societal systems such as education. This study aims to conceptualize a coupled education-healthcare system during a pandemic and identify key variables and relations that affect the accessibility of both systems. This is essential to address the interconnected nature of pandemic policymaking and design policies that account for possible unintended consequences that interventions in healthcare may have on education and vice versa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group model building and in-depth interviews with actors from healthcare and education were used to develop a coupled causal loop diagram of healthcare and education accessibility in the Netherlands during a pandemic. The causal loop diagram is analysed with cross-impact analysis to identify key leverage points, monitoring variables, feedback loops and relations between healthcare and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six causal relations were identified between healthcare and education, indicating a relevant impact of healthcare on education during pandemics. Cross-impact analysis identified 24 leverage points, of which 10 were in healthcare, 11 in education and 4 in the contextual environment. During the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, healthcare utilized all these leverage points, education utilized six and two were used not pertaining to healthcare or education but the contextual environment. Leverage points included the availability and wellbeing of personnel, number of patients, progress of pupils/students and resources. Seven monitoring variables included the availability of personnel, resources in education and progress of pupils/students, and were utilized in healthcare and education during the pandemic. Four feedback loops were found, of which three are reinforcing. One large balancing feedback loop is situated between the healthcare and education system, indicating mutual dependency to maintain staff for the accessibility of healthcare and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Group model building, in-depth interviews and cross-impact analysis identified key variables, causal relations and feedback loops illustrating the coupled nature of healthcare and education during pandemics. This highlights the need for integrated policymaking that addresses and considers coupled systems to ensure accessibility to both healthcare and education. The finalized model can serve as a tool to support such integrated policymaking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01359-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01359-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行和随后的政策在荷兰的影响超出了医疗保健,影响了教育等其他社会系统。本研究旨在概念化大流行期间的耦合教育-医疗保健系统,并确定影响这两个系统可及性的关键变量和关系。这对于处理大流行病政策制定的相互关联性质和设计政策至关重要,这些政策应考虑到卫生保健干预措施可能对教育产生的意外后果,反之亦然。方法:采用群体模型构建和对医疗保健和教育行为者的深入访谈,开发了大流行期间荷兰医疗保健和教育可及性的耦合因果循环图。通过交叉影响分析对因果循环图进行分析,以确定关键杠杆点、监测变量、反馈循环以及医疗保健与教育之间的关系。结果:在卫生保健和教育之间确定了6种因果关系,表明在流行病期间卫生保健对教育的相关影响。交叉影响分析确定了24个杠杆点,其中10个在医疗保健领域,11个在教育领域,4个在背景环境领域。在荷兰的COVID-19大流行期间,医疗保健利用了所有这些杠杆点,教育利用了6个,其中2个与医疗保健或教育无关,而是与上下文环境有关。杠杆点包括人员的可用性和福利,患者数量,小学生/学生的进步和资源。7个监测变量包括人员的可用性、教育资源和小学生/学生的进步情况,并在大流行病期间用于保健和教育。他们发现了四个反馈回路,其中三个是强化的。一个巨大的平衡反馈回路位于医疗保健和教育系统之间,表明相互依赖,以维持医疗保健和教育的可及性。结论:群体模型构建、深度访谈和交叉影响分析确定了流行病期间保健和教育耦合性质的关键变量、因果关系和反馈循环。这突出表明需要制定综合政策,处理和考虑耦合系统,以确保获得医疗保健和教育。最终确定的模型可以作为支持这种综合决策的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying key complex relations between education and healthcare in the Netherlands for future pandemic management.

Identifying key complex relations between education and healthcare in the Netherlands for future pandemic management.

Identifying key complex relations between education and healthcare in the Netherlands for future pandemic management.

Identifying key complex relations between education and healthcare in the Netherlands for future pandemic management.

Background: The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and subsequent policies in the Netherlands extended beyond healthcare, impacting other societal systems such as education. This study aims to conceptualize a coupled education-healthcare system during a pandemic and identify key variables and relations that affect the accessibility of both systems. This is essential to address the interconnected nature of pandemic policymaking and design policies that account for possible unintended consequences that interventions in healthcare may have on education and vice versa.

Methods: Group model building and in-depth interviews with actors from healthcare and education were used to develop a coupled causal loop diagram of healthcare and education accessibility in the Netherlands during a pandemic. The causal loop diagram is analysed with cross-impact analysis to identify key leverage points, monitoring variables, feedback loops and relations between healthcare and education.

Results: Six causal relations were identified between healthcare and education, indicating a relevant impact of healthcare on education during pandemics. Cross-impact analysis identified 24 leverage points, of which 10 were in healthcare, 11 in education and 4 in the contextual environment. During the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, healthcare utilized all these leverage points, education utilized six and two were used not pertaining to healthcare or education but the contextual environment. Leverage points included the availability and wellbeing of personnel, number of patients, progress of pupils/students and resources. Seven monitoring variables included the availability of personnel, resources in education and progress of pupils/students, and were utilized in healthcare and education during the pandemic. Four feedback loops were found, of which three are reinforcing. One large balancing feedback loop is situated between the healthcare and education system, indicating mutual dependency to maintain staff for the accessibility of healthcare and education.

Conclusions: Group model building, in-depth interviews and cross-impact analysis identified key variables, causal relations and feedback loops illustrating the coupled nature of healthcare and education during pandemics. This highlights the need for integrated policymaking that addresses and considers coupled systems to ensure accessibility to both healthcare and education. The finalized model can serve as a tool to support such integrated policymaking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信