揭开卫生和福利领域合作生产计划理论的神秘面纱:对新研究者系统观点的访谈研究。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Annika Nordin, Sofia Kjellström, Ann-Christine Andersson
{"title":"揭开卫生和福利领域合作生产计划理论的神秘面纱:对新研究者系统观点的访谈研究。","authors":"Annika Nordin, Sofia Kjellström, Ann-Christine Andersson","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01368-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coproduction is an inclusive approach for improving health and social care services, and coproduction research mostly focuses on participating stakeholders who are not researchers. Programme theories are important for designing, evaluating and disseminating change initiatives; however, few empirical studies on quality improvement initiatives or coproduction projects include explicit programme theories. This study addresses these knowledge gaps by describing new researchers' initial implicit programme theories of coproduction from three different system perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional interview substudy that includes 12 respondents. The respondents are new researchers (doctoral students) in Samskapa, an international research programme. The respondents conduct their studies in their own national contexts: Western Europe and North America. The interviews focus on their thoughts and experiences of coproduction, and the data are analysed using directed content analysis based on central concepts of programme theory. Coded statements are additionally coded for the system perspective they refer to. To describe programme theories of coproduction from micro-, meso- and macrosystem perspectives, a latent interpretation of the data is carried out. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist for qualitative studies was used to assure quality standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A generic programme theory of coproduction is suggested: If microsystem actors collaborate, facilitated by mesosystem mediators and supported by macrosystem managements' feedback and engagement, then coproduction will occur and health and welfare systems will improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coproduction projects are complex interventions that exhibit equifinality - a principle from open systems theory which posits that similar outcomes can be achieved through multiple, distinct pathways. Programme theories of coproduction from several system perspectives can be merged into a generic programme theory, which in turn can capture the interventions' complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystifying programme theories of co-production in health and welfare: An interview study on new researchers' systems perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Annika Nordin, Sofia Kjellström, Ann-Christine Andersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-025-01368-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coproduction is an inclusive approach for improving health and social care services, and coproduction research mostly focuses on participating stakeholders who are not researchers. Programme theories are important for designing, evaluating and disseminating change initiatives; however, few empirical studies on quality improvement initiatives or coproduction projects include explicit programme theories. This study addresses these knowledge gaps by describing new researchers' initial implicit programme theories of coproduction from three different system perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional interview substudy that includes 12 respondents. The respondents are new researchers (doctoral students) in Samskapa, an international research programme. The respondents conduct their studies in their own national contexts: Western Europe and North America. The interviews focus on their thoughts and experiences of coproduction, and the data are analysed using directed content analysis based on central concepts of programme theory. Coded statements are additionally coded for the system perspective they refer to. To describe programme theories of coproduction from micro-, meso- and macrosystem perspectives, a latent interpretation of the data is carried out. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist for qualitative studies was used to assure quality standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A generic programme theory of coproduction is suggested: If microsystem actors collaborate, facilitated by mesosystem mediators and supported by macrosystem managements' feedback and engagement, then coproduction will occur and health and welfare systems will improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coproduction projects are complex interventions that exhibit equifinality - a principle from open systems theory which posits that similar outcomes can be achieved through multiple, distinct pathways. Programme theories of coproduction from several system perspectives can be merged into a generic programme theory, which in turn can capture the interventions' complexity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01368-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01368-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:合作生产是一种改善卫生和社会保健服务的包容性方法,合作生产研究主要侧重于非研究人员的参与利益攸关方。方案理论对于设计、评价和传播变革倡议很重要;然而,很少有关于质量改进倡议或合作生产项目的实证研究包括明确的方案理论。本研究通过从三个不同的系统角度描述新研究者最初的合作生产隐性计划理论来解决这些知识差距。方法:这是一个横断面访谈子研究,包括12名受访者。受访者是Samskapa国际研究项目的新研究人员(博士生)。受访者在自己的国家背景下进行研究:西欧和北美。访谈的重点是他们的想法和合作制作的经验,并使用基于节目理论中心概念的定向内容分析来分析数据。编码语句是针对它们所引用的系统透视图进行额外编码的。为了从微观、中观和宏观系统的角度描述合作生产的方案理论,对数据进行了潜在的解释。定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ)检查表用于确保质量标准。结果:提出了协同生产的一般规划理论:如果微观系统参与者协作,在中观系统中介的推动下,在宏观系统管理者的反馈和参与的支持下,协同生产将会发生,卫生和福利系统将得到改善。结论:合作生产项目是表现出均等性的复杂干预措施——这是开放系统理论的一个原则,它假设通过多种不同的途径可以实现类似的结果。从几个系统的角度来看,合作生产的规划理论可以合并为一个通用的规划理论,这反过来又可以捕捉到干预措施的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demystifying programme theories of co-production in health and welfare: An interview study on new researchers' systems perspectives.

Background: Coproduction is an inclusive approach for improving health and social care services, and coproduction research mostly focuses on participating stakeholders who are not researchers. Programme theories are important for designing, evaluating and disseminating change initiatives; however, few empirical studies on quality improvement initiatives or coproduction projects include explicit programme theories. This study addresses these knowledge gaps by describing new researchers' initial implicit programme theories of coproduction from three different system perspectives.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional interview substudy that includes 12 respondents. The respondents are new researchers (doctoral students) in Samskapa, an international research programme. The respondents conduct their studies in their own national contexts: Western Europe and North America. The interviews focus on their thoughts and experiences of coproduction, and the data are analysed using directed content analysis based on central concepts of programme theory. Coded statements are additionally coded for the system perspective they refer to. To describe programme theories of coproduction from micro-, meso- and macrosystem perspectives, a latent interpretation of the data is carried out. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist for qualitative studies was used to assure quality standards.

Results: A generic programme theory of coproduction is suggested: If microsystem actors collaborate, facilitated by mesosystem mediators and supported by macrosystem managements' feedback and engagement, then coproduction will occur and health and welfare systems will improve.

Conclusions: Coproduction projects are complex interventions that exhibit equifinality - a principle from open systems theory which posits that similar outcomes can be achieved through multiple, distinct pathways. Programme theories of coproduction from several system perspectives can be merged into a generic programme theory, which in turn can capture the interventions' complexity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信