Britt Christensen, Michael Scharl, Brian Bressler, Zaeem Khan, Yuliya Halchenko, Celine Gisler, Pravin Kamble, Shashi Adsul, Zeinab Farhat, Marc Ferrante
{"title":"Vedolizumab和Ustekinumab在Biologic-Naïve早期或晚期克罗恩病患者中的临床有效性和安全性:来自EVOLVE扩展研究的结果","authors":"Britt Christensen, Michael Scharl, Brian Bressler, Zaeem Khan, Yuliya Halchenko, Celine Gisler, Pravin Kamble, Shashi Adsul, Zeinab Farhat, Marc Ferrante","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab as first-line biologics in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), by disease duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EVOLVE Expansion (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05056441) was a retrospective medical chart review study in Australia, Belgium, and Switzerland. Biologic-naïve patients with CD (≥18 years old) initiated first-line biologic treatment with vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Cumulative rates of clinical response, remission, mucosal healing, and treatment persistence were assessed over 36 months. Outcomes were compared between patients with early (≤2 years) and late (>2 years) disease at biologic initiation. Serious adverse events (SAEs), serious infections (SIs), and healthcare resource use (HCRU) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In early (<i>n</i> = 249) and late (<i>n</i> = 371) CD subgroups, there were no significant differences over 36 months between vedolizumab and ustekinumab in the cumulative rates of clinical response (early CD, 81.6% vs 80.7%; <i>P</i> = .31; late CD, 83.7% vs 86.5%; <i>P</i> = .31) or clinical remission (early CD, 87.9% vs 85.0%; <i>P</i> = .74; late CD, 91.1% vs 90.6%; <i>P</i> = .96). In patients with early CD, mucosal healing rates were significantly higher with vedolizumab than ustekinumab at both 24 (<i>P</i> = .02) and 36 months (<i>P</i> = .03). Treatment persistence was significantly higher with ustekinumab versus vedolizumab over 36 months in patients with late CD, but similar in patients with early CD. There were no significant differences in SAEs, SIs, or HCRU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab are effective treatment options for early- and late-stage CD. Over 36 months, mucosal healing rates in patients with early CD were significantly higher with vedolizumab than with ustekinumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"7 3","pages":"otaf031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Biologic-Naïve Patients With Early or Late Crohn's Disease: Results From the EVOLVE Expansion Study.\",\"authors\":\"Britt Christensen, Michael Scharl, Brian Bressler, Zaeem Khan, Yuliya Halchenko, Celine Gisler, Pravin Kamble, Shashi Adsul, Zeinab Farhat, Marc Ferrante\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otaf031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab as first-line biologics in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), by disease duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EVOLVE Expansion (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05056441) was a retrospective medical chart review study in Australia, Belgium, and Switzerland. Biologic-naïve patients with CD (≥18 years old) initiated first-line biologic treatment with vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Cumulative rates of clinical response, remission, mucosal healing, and treatment persistence were assessed over 36 months. Outcomes were compared between patients with early (≤2 years) and late (>2 years) disease at biologic initiation. Serious adverse events (SAEs), serious infections (SIs), and healthcare resource use (HCRU) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In early (<i>n</i> = 249) and late (<i>n</i> = 371) CD subgroups, there were no significant differences over 36 months between vedolizumab and ustekinumab in the cumulative rates of clinical response (early CD, 81.6% vs 80.7%; <i>P</i> = .31; late CD, 83.7% vs 86.5%; <i>P</i> = .31) or clinical remission (early CD, 87.9% vs 85.0%; <i>P</i> = .74; late CD, 91.1% vs 90.6%; <i>P</i> = .96). In patients with early CD, mucosal healing rates were significantly higher with vedolizumab than ustekinumab at both 24 (<i>P</i> = .02) and 36 months (<i>P</i> = .03). Treatment persistence was significantly higher with ustekinumab versus vedolizumab over 36 months in patients with late CD, but similar in patients with early CD. There were no significant differences in SAEs, SIs, or HCRU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab are effective treatment options for early- and late-stage CD. Over 36 months, mucosal healing rates in patients with early CD were significantly higher with vedolizumab than with ustekinumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"otaf031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238940/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:我们根据病程评估了vedolizumab和ustekinumab作为克罗恩病(CD)患者一线生物制剂的实际有效性和安全性。方法:EVOLVE Expansion (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05056441)是一项在澳大利亚、比利时和瑞士进行的回顾性医学图表回顾研究。Biologic-naïve CD患者(≥18岁)开始使用vedolizumab或ustekinumab进行一线生物治疗。临床反应、缓解、粘膜愈合和治疗持续性的累积率在36个月内进行评估。比较生物起始期早期(≤2年)和晚期(≤2年)患者的预后。评估了严重不良事件(sae)、严重感染(si)和医疗资源使用(HCRU)。结果:在早期(n = 249)和晚期(n = 371) CD亚组中,在36个月内,vedolizumab和ustekinumab在累积临床反应率方面没有显著差异(早期CD, 81.6% vs 80.7%;p = .31;中盘,83.7% vs 86.5%;P = 0.31)或临床缓解(早期CD, 87.9% vs 85.0%;p = .74;尾盘,91.1% vs 90.6%;p = .96)。在早期CD患者中,在24个月(P = 0.02)和36个月(P = 0.03)时,vedolizumab的粘膜愈合率均显著高于ustekinumab。在晚期CD患者中,ustekinumab与vedolizumab在36个月内的治疗持久性显著高于早期CD患者,但在SAEs, si或HCRU方面没有显着差异。结论:vedolizumab和ustekinumab都是早期和晚期CD的有效治疗选择。超过36个月,早期CD患者使用vedolizumab的粘膜愈合率明显高于ustekinumab。
Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Biologic-Naïve Patients With Early or Late Crohn's Disease: Results From the EVOLVE Expansion Study.
Background: We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab as first-line biologics in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), by disease duration.
Methods: EVOLVE Expansion (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05056441) was a retrospective medical chart review study in Australia, Belgium, and Switzerland. Biologic-naïve patients with CD (≥18 years old) initiated first-line biologic treatment with vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Cumulative rates of clinical response, remission, mucosal healing, and treatment persistence were assessed over 36 months. Outcomes were compared between patients with early (≤2 years) and late (>2 years) disease at biologic initiation. Serious adverse events (SAEs), serious infections (SIs), and healthcare resource use (HCRU) were evaluated.
Results: In early (n = 249) and late (n = 371) CD subgroups, there were no significant differences over 36 months between vedolizumab and ustekinumab in the cumulative rates of clinical response (early CD, 81.6% vs 80.7%; P = .31; late CD, 83.7% vs 86.5%; P = .31) or clinical remission (early CD, 87.9% vs 85.0%; P = .74; late CD, 91.1% vs 90.6%; P = .96). In patients with early CD, mucosal healing rates were significantly higher with vedolizumab than ustekinumab at both 24 (P = .02) and 36 months (P = .03). Treatment persistence was significantly higher with ustekinumab versus vedolizumab over 36 months in patients with late CD, but similar in patients with early CD. There were no significant differences in SAEs, SIs, or HCRU.
Conclusions: Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab are effective treatment options for early- and late-stage CD. Over 36 months, mucosal healing rates in patients with early CD were significantly higher with vedolizumab than with ustekinumab.