Usok Hyun, Seongnam Chu, Sungyun Kim, Jung-Ki Hong, Taeyoung Kim, In-Soo Yoon, Jung-Jin Kim, Hyun-Jong Cho
{"title":"两种不同盐份西格列汀片在健康人体内的药动学及生物等效性评价。","authors":"Usok Hyun, Seongnam Chu, Sungyun Kim, Jung-Ki Hong, Taeyoung Kim, In-Soo Yoon, Jung-Jin Kim, Hyun-Jong Cho","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rate and extent of absorption of a test formulation (sitagliptin hydrochloride) and a reference formulation (sitagliptin phosphate). An open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-center, 2-sequence, 2-period, and cross-over phase 1 study was implemented to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations containing a single dose of sitagliptin 100 mg in 32 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The differences between the test and reference formulations in terms of the area under the curve from dosing to the time of the last measured concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and the maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were found to be not significant. The 90% confidence intervals of sitagliptin Ln-transformed AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were within the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. The test formulation with sitagliptin hydrochloride was bioequivalent to the reference formulation with sitagliptin phosphate in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Sitagliptin Tablets With Different Salts in Healthy Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Usok Hyun, Seongnam Chu, Sungyun Kim, Jung-Ki Hong, Taeyoung Kim, In-Soo Yoon, Jung-Jin Kim, Hyun-Jong Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rate and extent of absorption of a test formulation (sitagliptin hydrochloride) and a reference formulation (sitagliptin phosphate). An open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-center, 2-sequence, 2-period, and cross-over phase 1 study was implemented to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations containing a single dose of sitagliptin 100 mg in 32 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The differences between the test and reference formulations in terms of the area under the curve from dosing to the time of the last measured concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and the maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were found to be not significant. The 90% confidence intervals of sitagliptin Ln-transformed AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were within the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. The test formulation with sitagliptin hydrochloride was bioequivalent to the reference formulation with sitagliptin phosphate in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1573\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Sitagliptin Tablets With Different Salts in Healthy Subjects.
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rate and extent of absorption of a test formulation (sitagliptin hydrochloride) and a reference formulation (sitagliptin phosphate). An open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-center, 2-sequence, 2-period, and cross-over phase 1 study was implemented to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations containing a single dose of sitagliptin 100 mg in 32 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The differences between the test and reference formulations in terms of the area under the curve from dosing to the time of the last measured concentration (AUClast) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) were found to be not significant. The 90% confidence intervals of sitagliptin Ln-transformed AUClast and Cmax were within the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. The test formulation with sitagliptin hydrochloride was bioequivalent to the reference formulation with sitagliptin phosphate in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.