两种不同盐份西格列汀片在健康人体内的药动学及生物等效性评价。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Usok Hyun, Seongnam Chu, Sungyun Kim, Jung-Ki Hong, Taeyoung Kim, In-Soo Yoon, Jung-Jin Kim, Hyun-Jong Cho
{"title":"两种不同盐份西格列汀片在健康人体内的药动学及生物等效性评价。","authors":"Usok Hyun, Seongnam Chu, Sungyun Kim, Jung-Ki Hong, Taeyoung Kim, In-Soo Yoon, Jung-Jin Kim, Hyun-Jong Cho","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rate and extent of absorption of a test formulation (sitagliptin hydrochloride) and a reference formulation (sitagliptin phosphate). An open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-center, 2-sequence, 2-period, and cross-over phase 1 study was implemented to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations containing a single dose of sitagliptin 100 mg in 32 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The differences between the test and reference formulations in terms of the area under the curve from dosing to the time of the last measured concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and the maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were found to be not significant. The 90% confidence intervals of sitagliptin Ln-transformed AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were within the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. The test formulation with sitagliptin hydrochloride was bioequivalent to the reference formulation with sitagliptin phosphate in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Sitagliptin Tablets With Different Salts in Healthy Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Usok Hyun, Seongnam Chu, Sungyun Kim, Jung-Ki Hong, Taeyoung Kim, In-Soo Yoon, Jung-Jin Kim, Hyun-Jong Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rate and extent of absorption of a test formulation (sitagliptin hydrochloride) and a reference formulation (sitagliptin phosphate). An open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-center, 2-sequence, 2-period, and cross-over phase 1 study was implemented to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations containing a single dose of sitagliptin 100 mg in 32 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The differences between the test and reference formulations in terms of the area under the curve from dosing to the time of the last measured concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and the maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were found to be not significant. The 90% confidence intervals of sitagliptin Ln-transformed AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were within the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. The test formulation with sitagliptin hydrochloride was bioequivalent to the reference formulation with sitagliptin phosphate in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1573\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一种试验制剂(盐酸西格列汀)和一种参比制剂(磷酸西格列汀)的吸收速率和程度。一项开放标签、随机、单剂量、单中心、2序列、2周期、交叉的1期研究在32名健康志愿者空腹条件下,评估含有单剂量西格列汀100mg的试验制剂和参比制剂的药代动力学生物等效性。从给药到最后一次测量浓度(AUClast)和最大浓度(Cmax)的曲线下面积方面,试验制剂和参考制剂之间的差异不显著。西格列汀ln转化AUClast和Cmax的90%置信区间均在80% ~ 125%的药代动力学生物等效性接受范围内。在健康男性志愿者空腹条件下,盐酸西格列汀试验制剂与磷酸西格列汀对照制剂具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Sitagliptin Tablets With Different Salts in Healthy Subjects.

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rate and extent of absorption of a test formulation (sitagliptin hydrochloride) and a reference formulation (sitagliptin phosphate). An open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-center, 2-sequence, 2-period, and cross-over phase 1 study was implemented to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations containing a single dose of sitagliptin 100 mg in 32 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The differences between the test and reference formulations in terms of the area under the curve from dosing to the time of the last measured concentration (AUClast) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) were found to be not significant. The 90% confidence intervals of sitagliptin Ln-transformed AUClast and Cmax were within the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. The test formulation with sitagliptin hydrochloride was bioequivalent to the reference formulation with sitagliptin phosphate in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信